Medication reconciliation in emergency department - the role of clinical pharmacist

Objective: To classify the frequencies and types of pharmaceutical interventions related to medication reconciliation performed in the hospital emergency room. Methods: This is a retrospective sectional study of medication reconciliation carried out in the emergency department of a referral hospita...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amanda V. BARBOSA, Daniele S. SZPAK, Pedro P. CHRISPIM
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
PT
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Farmácia Hospitalar e Serviços de Saúde 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0f63d59147c84b99ad068254fceb79b3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0f63d59147c84b99ad068254fceb79b3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0f63d59147c84b99ad068254fceb79b32021-11-28T02:43:31ZMedication reconciliation in emergency department - the role of clinical pharmacist10.30968/rbfhss.2021.121.05962179-59242316-7750https://doaj.org/article/0f63d59147c84b99ad068254fceb79b32021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.rbfhss.org.br/sbrafh/article/view/596https://doaj.org/toc/2179-5924https://doaj.org/toc/2316-7750 Objective: To classify the frequencies and types of pharmaceutical interventions related to medication reconciliation performed in the hospital emergency room. Methods: This is a retrospective sectional study of medication reconciliation carried out in the emergency department of a referral hospital in cardiology from June 11 to August 11, 2019. All patients admitted to the sector at the corresponding period and that have been reconciled were selected for the study. Patients’ home medications were classified according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification and as reconciled, not reconciled or reconciled after pharmaceutical intervention. Types of pharmaceutical interventions considered: suggestions for correcting the omission of patients’ home medications, dose or frequency. Interventions were classified as accepted or not accepted. The patients were divided into two groups: no discrepancies or intentional discrepancies (G1) and unintentional discrepancies (G2). The groups were compared using the Student’s T test (continuous data) and chi-square (x2) or Fisher’s exact test (categorical variables), considering statistical significance values of p <0.05. Results: 182 admissions were analyzed, with an average number of patient’s home medications use of 4.9 ± 3.6 drugs per patient. Of the 900 patients’ home medications, discrepancies were found in 227 medications on medical prescription of admission at the emergency room, being 48.9% intentional discrepancies and 51.1% unintentional discrepancies. Regarding unintentional discrepancies, 81% were due to the medication’s omission correction on the medical prescription; 9.5% were correction of divergent dose of patients’ home medications and frequency of administration respectively and all were adjusted after pharmaceutical intervention. 139 pharmaceutical interventions were performed to correct medication discrepancies, with 83.5% of acceptance by medical staff. Among all the analyzed medications, 51.8% had at least one registration failure by medical and/or nursing staff. Conclusion: The presence of the pharmacist in the emergency room reduced the incidence of unintentional discrepancies related to medication reconciliation, through interventions to correct medication omissions, dose and frequency, being an important element for patient safety. Amanda V. BARBOSA Daniele S. SZPAK Pedro P. CHRISPIM Sociedade Brasileira de Farmácia Hospitalar e Serviços de SaúdearticlePublic aspects of medicineRA1-1270Pharmacy and materia medicaRS1-441Therapeutics. PharmacologyRM1-950ENPTRevista Brasileira de Farmácia Hospitalar e Serviços de Saúde, Vol 12, Iss 1 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
PT
topic Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Pharmacy and materia medica
RS1-441
Therapeutics. Pharmacology
RM1-950
spellingShingle Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Pharmacy and materia medica
RS1-441
Therapeutics. Pharmacology
RM1-950
Amanda V. BARBOSA
Daniele S. SZPAK
Pedro P. CHRISPIM
Medication reconciliation in emergency department - the role of clinical pharmacist
description Objective: To classify the frequencies and types of pharmaceutical interventions related to medication reconciliation performed in the hospital emergency room. Methods: This is a retrospective sectional study of medication reconciliation carried out in the emergency department of a referral hospital in cardiology from June 11 to August 11, 2019. All patients admitted to the sector at the corresponding period and that have been reconciled were selected for the study. Patients’ home medications were classified according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification and as reconciled, not reconciled or reconciled after pharmaceutical intervention. Types of pharmaceutical interventions considered: suggestions for correcting the omission of patients’ home medications, dose or frequency. Interventions were classified as accepted or not accepted. The patients were divided into two groups: no discrepancies or intentional discrepancies (G1) and unintentional discrepancies (G2). The groups were compared using the Student’s T test (continuous data) and chi-square (x2) or Fisher’s exact test (categorical variables), considering statistical significance values of p <0.05. Results: 182 admissions were analyzed, with an average number of patient’s home medications use of 4.9 ± 3.6 drugs per patient. Of the 900 patients’ home medications, discrepancies were found in 227 medications on medical prescription of admission at the emergency room, being 48.9% intentional discrepancies and 51.1% unintentional discrepancies. Regarding unintentional discrepancies, 81% were due to the medication’s omission correction on the medical prescription; 9.5% were correction of divergent dose of patients’ home medications and frequency of administration respectively and all were adjusted after pharmaceutical intervention. 139 pharmaceutical interventions were performed to correct medication discrepancies, with 83.5% of acceptance by medical staff. Among all the analyzed medications, 51.8% had at least one registration failure by medical and/or nursing staff. Conclusion: The presence of the pharmacist in the emergency room reduced the incidence of unintentional discrepancies related to medication reconciliation, through interventions to correct medication omissions, dose and frequency, being an important element for patient safety.
format article
author Amanda V. BARBOSA
Daniele S. SZPAK
Pedro P. CHRISPIM
author_facet Amanda V. BARBOSA
Daniele S. SZPAK
Pedro P. CHRISPIM
author_sort Amanda V. BARBOSA
title Medication reconciliation in emergency department - the role of clinical pharmacist
title_short Medication reconciliation in emergency department - the role of clinical pharmacist
title_full Medication reconciliation in emergency department - the role of clinical pharmacist
title_fullStr Medication reconciliation in emergency department - the role of clinical pharmacist
title_full_unstemmed Medication reconciliation in emergency department - the role of clinical pharmacist
title_sort medication reconciliation in emergency department - the role of clinical pharmacist
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Farmácia Hospitalar e Serviços de Saúde
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/0f63d59147c84b99ad068254fceb79b3
work_keys_str_mv AT amandavbarbosa medicationreconciliationinemergencydepartmenttheroleofclinicalpharmacist
AT danielesszpak medicationreconciliationinemergencydepartmenttheroleofclinicalpharmacist
AT pedropchrispim medicationreconciliationinemergencydepartmenttheroleofclinicalpharmacist
_version_ 1718408420980162560