Molecular epidemiology of Brucella species in mixed livestock-human ecosystems in Kenya

Abstract Brucellosis, caused by several species of the genus Brucella, is a zoonotic disease that affects humans and animal species worldwide. Information on the Brucella species circulating in different hosts in Kenya is largely unknown, thus limiting the adoption of targeted control strategies. Th...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: James M. Akoko, Roger Pelle, AbdulHamid S. Lukambagire, Eunice M. Machuka, Daniel Nthiwa, Coletha Mathew, Eric M. Fèvre, Bernard Bett, Elizabeth A. J. Cook, Doreen Othero, Bassirou Bonfoh, Rudovick R. Kazwala, Gabriel Shirima, Esther Schelling, Jo E. B. Halliday, Collins Ouma
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0f7655385d1544abbdcda13d57441b69
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0f7655385d1544abbdcda13d57441b69
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0f7655385d1544abbdcda13d57441b692021-12-02T16:45:10ZMolecular epidemiology of Brucella species in mixed livestock-human ecosystems in Kenya10.1038/s41598-021-88327-z2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/0f7655385d1544abbdcda13d57441b692021-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88327-zhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Brucellosis, caused by several species of the genus Brucella, is a zoonotic disease that affects humans and animal species worldwide. Information on the Brucella species circulating in different hosts in Kenya is largely unknown, thus limiting the adoption of targeted control strategies. This study was conducted in multi-host livestock populations in Kenya to detect the circulating Brucella species and assess evidence of host–pathogen associations. Serum samples were collected from 228 cattle, 162 goats, 158 sheep, 49 camels, and 257 humans from Narok and Marsabit counties in Kenya. Information on age, location and history of abortion or retained placenta were obtained for sampled livestock. Data on age, gender and location of residence were also collected for human participants. All samples were tested using genus level real-time PCR assays with primers specific for IS711 and bcsp31 targets for the detection of Brucella. All genus positive samples (positive for both targets) were further tested with a speciation assay for AlkB and BMEI1162 targets, specific for B. abortus and B. melitensis, respectively. Samples with adequate quantities aggregating to 577 were also tested with the Rose Bengal Test (RBT). A total of 199 (33.3%) livestock and 99 (38.5%) human samples tested positive for genus Brucella. Animal Brucella PCR positive status was positively predicted by RBT positive results (OR = 8.3, 95% CI 4.0–17.1). Humans aged 21–40 years had higher odds (OR = 2.8, 95% CI 1.2–6.6) of being Brucella PCR positive compared to the other age categories. The data on detection of different Brucella species indicates that B. abortus was detected more often in cattle (OR = 2.3, 95% CI 1.1–4.6) and camels (OR = 2.9, 95% CI 1.3–6.3), while B. melitensis was detected more in sheep (OR = 3.6, 95% CI 2.0–6.7) and goats (OR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.0–3.1). Both B. abortus and B. melitensis DNA were detected in humans and in multiple livestock host species, suggesting cross-transmission of these species among the different hosts. The detection of these two zoonotic Brucella species in humans further underpins the importance of One Health prevention strategies that target multiple host species, especially in the multi-host livestock populations.James M. AkokoRoger PelleAbdulHamid S. LukambagireEunice M. MachukaDaniel NthiwaColetha MathewEric M. FèvreBernard BettElizabeth A. J. CookDoreen OtheroBassirou BonfohRudovick R. KazwalaGabriel ShirimaEsther SchellingJo E. B. HallidayCollins OumaNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
James M. Akoko
Roger Pelle
AbdulHamid S. Lukambagire
Eunice M. Machuka
Daniel Nthiwa
Coletha Mathew
Eric M. Fèvre
Bernard Bett
Elizabeth A. J. Cook
Doreen Othero
Bassirou Bonfoh
Rudovick R. Kazwala
Gabriel Shirima
Esther Schelling
Jo E. B. Halliday
Collins Ouma
Molecular epidemiology of Brucella species in mixed livestock-human ecosystems in Kenya
description Abstract Brucellosis, caused by several species of the genus Brucella, is a zoonotic disease that affects humans and animal species worldwide. Information on the Brucella species circulating in different hosts in Kenya is largely unknown, thus limiting the adoption of targeted control strategies. This study was conducted in multi-host livestock populations in Kenya to detect the circulating Brucella species and assess evidence of host–pathogen associations. Serum samples were collected from 228 cattle, 162 goats, 158 sheep, 49 camels, and 257 humans from Narok and Marsabit counties in Kenya. Information on age, location and history of abortion or retained placenta were obtained for sampled livestock. Data on age, gender and location of residence were also collected for human participants. All samples were tested using genus level real-time PCR assays with primers specific for IS711 and bcsp31 targets for the detection of Brucella. All genus positive samples (positive for both targets) were further tested with a speciation assay for AlkB and BMEI1162 targets, specific for B. abortus and B. melitensis, respectively. Samples with adequate quantities aggregating to 577 were also tested with the Rose Bengal Test (RBT). A total of 199 (33.3%) livestock and 99 (38.5%) human samples tested positive for genus Brucella. Animal Brucella PCR positive status was positively predicted by RBT positive results (OR = 8.3, 95% CI 4.0–17.1). Humans aged 21–40 years had higher odds (OR = 2.8, 95% CI 1.2–6.6) of being Brucella PCR positive compared to the other age categories. The data on detection of different Brucella species indicates that B. abortus was detected more often in cattle (OR = 2.3, 95% CI 1.1–4.6) and camels (OR = 2.9, 95% CI 1.3–6.3), while B. melitensis was detected more in sheep (OR = 3.6, 95% CI 2.0–6.7) and goats (OR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.0–3.1). Both B. abortus and B. melitensis DNA were detected in humans and in multiple livestock host species, suggesting cross-transmission of these species among the different hosts. The detection of these two zoonotic Brucella species in humans further underpins the importance of One Health prevention strategies that target multiple host species, especially in the multi-host livestock populations.
format article
author James M. Akoko
Roger Pelle
AbdulHamid S. Lukambagire
Eunice M. Machuka
Daniel Nthiwa
Coletha Mathew
Eric M. Fèvre
Bernard Bett
Elizabeth A. J. Cook
Doreen Othero
Bassirou Bonfoh
Rudovick R. Kazwala
Gabriel Shirima
Esther Schelling
Jo E. B. Halliday
Collins Ouma
author_facet James M. Akoko
Roger Pelle
AbdulHamid S. Lukambagire
Eunice M. Machuka
Daniel Nthiwa
Coletha Mathew
Eric M. Fèvre
Bernard Bett
Elizabeth A. J. Cook
Doreen Othero
Bassirou Bonfoh
Rudovick R. Kazwala
Gabriel Shirima
Esther Schelling
Jo E. B. Halliday
Collins Ouma
author_sort James M. Akoko
title Molecular epidemiology of Brucella species in mixed livestock-human ecosystems in Kenya
title_short Molecular epidemiology of Brucella species in mixed livestock-human ecosystems in Kenya
title_full Molecular epidemiology of Brucella species in mixed livestock-human ecosystems in Kenya
title_fullStr Molecular epidemiology of Brucella species in mixed livestock-human ecosystems in Kenya
title_full_unstemmed Molecular epidemiology of Brucella species in mixed livestock-human ecosystems in Kenya
title_sort molecular epidemiology of brucella species in mixed livestock-human ecosystems in kenya
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/0f7655385d1544abbdcda13d57441b69
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesmakoko molecularepidemiologyofbrucellaspeciesinmixedlivestockhumanecosystemsinkenya
AT rogerpelle molecularepidemiologyofbrucellaspeciesinmixedlivestockhumanecosystemsinkenya
AT abdulhamidslukambagire molecularepidemiologyofbrucellaspeciesinmixedlivestockhumanecosystemsinkenya
AT eunicemmachuka molecularepidemiologyofbrucellaspeciesinmixedlivestockhumanecosystemsinkenya
AT danielnthiwa molecularepidemiologyofbrucellaspeciesinmixedlivestockhumanecosystemsinkenya
AT colethamathew molecularepidemiologyofbrucellaspeciesinmixedlivestockhumanecosystemsinkenya
AT ericmfevre molecularepidemiologyofbrucellaspeciesinmixedlivestockhumanecosystemsinkenya
AT bernardbett molecularepidemiologyofbrucellaspeciesinmixedlivestockhumanecosystemsinkenya
AT elizabethajcook molecularepidemiologyofbrucellaspeciesinmixedlivestockhumanecosystemsinkenya
AT doreenothero molecularepidemiologyofbrucellaspeciesinmixedlivestockhumanecosystemsinkenya
AT bassiroubonfoh molecularepidemiologyofbrucellaspeciesinmixedlivestockhumanecosystemsinkenya
AT rudovickrkazwala molecularepidemiologyofbrucellaspeciesinmixedlivestockhumanecosystemsinkenya
AT gabrielshirima molecularepidemiologyofbrucellaspeciesinmixedlivestockhumanecosystemsinkenya
AT estherschelling molecularepidemiologyofbrucellaspeciesinmixedlivestockhumanecosystemsinkenya
AT joebhalliday molecularepidemiologyofbrucellaspeciesinmixedlivestockhumanecosystemsinkenya
AT collinsouma molecularepidemiologyofbrucellaspeciesinmixedlivestockhumanecosystemsinkenya
_version_ 1718383496999731200