TeamTree analysis: A new approach to evaluate scientific production.

Advances in science and technology depend on the work of research teams and the publication of results through peer-reviewed articles representing a growing socio-economic resource. Current methods to mine the scientific literature regarding a field of interest focus on content, but the workforce cr...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Frank W Pfrieger
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0f77b7bfc39e4c69b6723c38ea488352
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0f77b7bfc39e4c69b6723c38ea488352
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0f77b7bfc39e4c69b6723c38ea4883522021-12-02T20:06:46ZTeamTree analysis: A new approach to evaluate scientific production.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0253847https://doaj.org/article/0f77b7bfc39e4c69b6723c38ea4883522021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253847https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Advances in science and technology depend on the work of research teams and the publication of results through peer-reviewed articles representing a growing socio-economic resource. Current methods to mine the scientific literature regarding a field of interest focus on content, but the workforce credited by authorship remains largely unexplored. Notably, appropriate measures of scientific production are debated. Here, a new bibliometric approach named TeamTree analysis is introduced that visualizes the development and composition of the workforce driving a field. A new citation-independent measure that scales with the H index estimates impact based on publication record, genealogical ties and collaborative connections. This author-centered approach complements existing tools to mine the scientific literature and to evaluate research across disciplines.Frank W PfriegerPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 7, p e0253847 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Frank W Pfrieger
TeamTree analysis: A new approach to evaluate scientific production.
description Advances in science and technology depend on the work of research teams and the publication of results through peer-reviewed articles representing a growing socio-economic resource. Current methods to mine the scientific literature regarding a field of interest focus on content, but the workforce credited by authorship remains largely unexplored. Notably, appropriate measures of scientific production are debated. Here, a new bibliometric approach named TeamTree analysis is introduced that visualizes the development and composition of the workforce driving a field. A new citation-independent measure that scales with the H index estimates impact based on publication record, genealogical ties and collaborative connections. This author-centered approach complements existing tools to mine the scientific literature and to evaluate research across disciplines.
format article
author Frank W Pfrieger
author_facet Frank W Pfrieger
author_sort Frank W Pfrieger
title TeamTree analysis: A new approach to evaluate scientific production.
title_short TeamTree analysis: A new approach to evaluate scientific production.
title_full TeamTree analysis: A new approach to evaluate scientific production.
title_fullStr TeamTree analysis: A new approach to evaluate scientific production.
title_full_unstemmed TeamTree analysis: A new approach to evaluate scientific production.
title_sort teamtree analysis: a new approach to evaluate scientific production.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/0f77b7bfc39e4c69b6723c38ea488352
work_keys_str_mv AT frankwpfrieger teamtreeanalysisanewapproachtoevaluatescientificproduction
_version_ 1718375345306992640