A Note on Weak vs. Strong Generation in Human Language
This paper argues that various important results of formal language theory (e.g., the so-called Chomsky Hierarchy) may in fact be illusory as far as the human language faculty is concerned, as has been repeatedly emphasized by Chomsky himself. The paper takes up nested dependencies and cross-serial...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Sciendo
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/0f78ac1484414562b7185069cb2301b5 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:0f78ac1484414562b7185069cb2301b5 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:0f78ac1484414562b7185069cb2301b52021-12-02T19:10:00ZA Note on Weak vs. Strong Generation in Human Language1017-127410.1515/scl-2015-0004https://doaj.org/article/0f78ac1484414562b7185069cb2301b52015-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1515/scl-2015-0004https://doaj.org/toc/1017-1274This paper argues that various important results of formal language theory (e.g., the so-called Chomsky Hierarchy) may in fact be illusory as far as the human language faculty is concerned, as has been repeatedly emphasized by Chomsky himself. The paper takes up nested dependencies and cross-serial dependencies, the two important dependencies that typically show up in the discussion of the central classes of grammars and languages, and specifically shows that the fact that nested dependencies abound in human language while cross-serial dependencies are rather limited in human language can be naturally explained if we shift our attention from dependencies defined on terminal strings to abstract structures behind them. The paper then shows that nested dependencies are readily obtained by Merge, applying phase-by-phase, whereas cross-serial dependencies are available only as a result of copying Merge, which requires a constituency of the relevant strings. These results strongly suggest that dependencies are possible in human language only to the extent that they are the results from the structures that can be generated by Merge, leading to the conclusion that it is Merge-generability that determines various dependencies in human language, and that dependencies defined on the terminal strings are indeed illusory. A possible brain science experiment to demonstrate this point is also suggested.Fukui NaokiSciendoarticleweak generationstrong generationmerge-generabilitycross-serial dependenciesmildly context-sensitive弱生成強生成合併生成力跨序列依存溫和的語境制約Chinese language and literaturePL1001-3208ENStudies in Chinese Linguistics, Vol 36, Iss 2, Pp 59-68 (2015) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
weak generation strong generation merge-generability cross-serial dependencies mildly context-sensitive 弱生成 強生成 合併生成力 跨序列依存 溫和的語境制約 Chinese language and literature PL1001-3208 |
spellingShingle |
weak generation strong generation merge-generability cross-serial dependencies mildly context-sensitive 弱生成 強生成 合併生成力 跨序列依存 溫和的語境制約 Chinese language and literature PL1001-3208 Fukui Naoki A Note on Weak vs. Strong Generation in Human Language |
description |
This paper argues that various important results of formal language theory (e.g., the so-called Chomsky Hierarchy) may in fact be illusory as far as the human language faculty is concerned, as has been repeatedly emphasized by Chomsky himself. The paper takes up nested dependencies and cross-serial dependencies, the two important dependencies that typically show up in the discussion of the central classes of grammars and languages, and specifically shows that the fact that nested dependencies abound in human language while cross-serial dependencies are rather limited in human language can be naturally explained if we shift our attention from dependencies defined on terminal strings to abstract structures behind them. The paper then shows that nested dependencies are readily obtained by Merge, applying phase-by-phase, whereas cross-serial dependencies are available only as a result of copying Merge, which requires a constituency of the relevant strings. These results strongly suggest that dependencies are possible in human language only to the extent that they are the results from the structures that can be generated by Merge, leading to the conclusion that it is Merge-generability that determines various dependencies in human language, and that dependencies defined on the terminal strings are indeed illusory. A possible brain science experiment to demonstrate this point is also suggested. |
format |
article |
author |
Fukui Naoki |
author_facet |
Fukui Naoki |
author_sort |
Fukui Naoki |
title |
A Note on Weak vs. Strong Generation in Human Language |
title_short |
A Note on Weak vs. Strong Generation in Human Language |
title_full |
A Note on Weak vs. Strong Generation in Human Language |
title_fullStr |
A Note on Weak vs. Strong Generation in Human Language |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Note on Weak vs. Strong Generation in Human Language |
title_sort |
note on weak vs. strong generation in human language |
publisher |
Sciendo |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/0f78ac1484414562b7185069cb2301b5 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fukuinaoki anoteonweakvsstronggenerationinhumanlanguage AT fukuinaoki noteonweakvsstronggenerationinhumanlanguage |
_version_ |
1718377072228827136 |