A Note on Weak vs. Strong Generation in Human Language

This paper argues that various important results of formal language theory (e.g., the so-called Chomsky Hierarchy) may in fact be illusory as far as the human language faculty is concerned, as has been repeatedly emphasized by Chomsky himself. The paper takes up nested dependencies and cross-serial...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Fukui Naoki
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Sciendo 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0f78ac1484414562b7185069cb2301b5
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0f78ac1484414562b7185069cb2301b5
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0f78ac1484414562b7185069cb2301b52021-12-02T19:10:00ZA Note on Weak vs. Strong Generation in Human Language1017-127410.1515/scl-2015-0004https://doaj.org/article/0f78ac1484414562b7185069cb2301b52015-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1515/scl-2015-0004https://doaj.org/toc/1017-1274This paper argues that various important results of formal language theory (e.g., the so-called Chomsky Hierarchy) may in fact be illusory as far as the human language faculty is concerned, as has been repeatedly emphasized by Chomsky himself. The paper takes up nested dependencies and cross-serial dependencies, the two important dependencies that typically show up in the discussion of the central classes of grammars and languages, and specifically shows that the fact that nested dependencies abound in human language while cross-serial dependencies are rather limited in human language can be naturally explained if we shift our attention from dependencies defined on terminal strings to abstract structures behind them. The paper then shows that nested dependencies are readily obtained by Merge, applying phase-by-phase, whereas cross-serial dependencies are available only as a result of copying Merge, which requires a constituency of the relevant strings. These results strongly suggest that dependencies are possible in human language only to the extent that they are the results from the structures that can be generated by Merge, leading to the conclusion that it is Merge-generability that determines various dependencies in human language, and that dependencies defined on the terminal strings are indeed illusory. A possible brain science experiment to demonstrate this point is also suggested.Fukui NaokiSciendoarticleweak generationstrong generationmerge-generabilitycross-serial dependenciesmildly context-sensitive弱生成強生成合併生成力跨序列依存溫和的語境制約Chinese language and literaturePL1001-3208ENStudies in Chinese Linguistics, Vol 36, Iss 2, Pp 59-68 (2015)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic weak generation
strong generation
merge-generability
cross-serial dependencies
mildly context-sensitive
弱生成
強生成
合併生成力
跨序列依存
溫和的語境制約
Chinese language and literature
PL1001-3208
spellingShingle weak generation
strong generation
merge-generability
cross-serial dependencies
mildly context-sensitive
弱生成
強生成
合併生成力
跨序列依存
溫和的語境制約
Chinese language and literature
PL1001-3208
Fukui Naoki
A Note on Weak vs. Strong Generation in Human Language
description This paper argues that various important results of formal language theory (e.g., the so-called Chomsky Hierarchy) may in fact be illusory as far as the human language faculty is concerned, as has been repeatedly emphasized by Chomsky himself. The paper takes up nested dependencies and cross-serial dependencies, the two important dependencies that typically show up in the discussion of the central classes of grammars and languages, and specifically shows that the fact that nested dependencies abound in human language while cross-serial dependencies are rather limited in human language can be naturally explained if we shift our attention from dependencies defined on terminal strings to abstract structures behind them. The paper then shows that nested dependencies are readily obtained by Merge, applying phase-by-phase, whereas cross-serial dependencies are available only as a result of copying Merge, which requires a constituency of the relevant strings. These results strongly suggest that dependencies are possible in human language only to the extent that they are the results from the structures that can be generated by Merge, leading to the conclusion that it is Merge-generability that determines various dependencies in human language, and that dependencies defined on the terminal strings are indeed illusory. A possible brain science experiment to demonstrate this point is also suggested.
format article
author Fukui Naoki
author_facet Fukui Naoki
author_sort Fukui Naoki
title A Note on Weak vs. Strong Generation in Human Language
title_short A Note on Weak vs. Strong Generation in Human Language
title_full A Note on Weak vs. Strong Generation in Human Language
title_fullStr A Note on Weak vs. Strong Generation in Human Language
title_full_unstemmed A Note on Weak vs. Strong Generation in Human Language
title_sort note on weak vs. strong generation in human language
publisher Sciendo
publishDate 2015
url https://doaj.org/article/0f78ac1484414562b7185069cb2301b5
work_keys_str_mv AT fukuinaoki anoteonweakvsstronggenerationinhumanlanguage
AT fukuinaoki noteonweakvsstronggenerationinhumanlanguage
_version_ 1718377072228827136