Krisis of het afscheid van de filosofie?

The founders of Krisis saw their journal as part of Rudi Dutschke’s ‘long march through the institutions’: a philosophical journal that would criticize and change the practices and institutions of academic philosophy from within. Philosophy should play a critical and emancipatory role in society and...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: René Boomkens
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
NL
Publicado: University of Groningen Press 2020
Materias:
H
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0f825a144f834731837ec4b4d2eea099
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0f825a144f834731837ec4b4d2eea099
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0f825a144f834731837ec4b4d2eea0992021-12-02T18:00:26ZKrisis of het afscheid van de filosofie?1875-710310.21827/krisis.40.1.36974https://doaj.org/article/0f825a144f834731837ec4b4d2eea0992020-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://krisis.eu/article/view/36974https://doaj.org/toc/1875-7103The founders of Krisis saw their journal as part of Rudi Dutschke’s ‘long march through the institutions’: a philosophical journal that would criticize and change the practices and institutions of academic philosophy from within. Philosophy should play a critical and emancipatory role in society and in intellectual and public debates, and the journal could help to enhance that role. Academic philosophy did change, but in a rather different direction: new public management took over and submitted academic research and education to a new regime of entrepeneurial efficiency and disciplinary competition. To survive, Krisis metamorphosized several times and is now a broad bilingual online journal for intellectual debate and research with a loose relationship with academic philosophy. If it strengthens this identity, it can continue to play an intermediary role between academic research and public debate, in both directions.René BoomkensUniversity of Groningen PressarticleSocial SciencesHPolitical science (General)JA1-92Philosophy (General)B1-5802ENNLKrisis, Vol 40, Iss 1, Pp 36-47 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
NL
topic Social Sciences
H
Political science (General)
JA1-92
Philosophy (General)
B1-5802
spellingShingle Social Sciences
H
Political science (General)
JA1-92
Philosophy (General)
B1-5802
René Boomkens
Krisis of het afscheid van de filosofie?
description The founders of Krisis saw their journal as part of Rudi Dutschke’s ‘long march through the institutions’: a philosophical journal that would criticize and change the practices and institutions of academic philosophy from within. Philosophy should play a critical and emancipatory role in society and in intellectual and public debates, and the journal could help to enhance that role. Academic philosophy did change, but in a rather different direction: new public management took over and submitted academic research and education to a new regime of entrepeneurial efficiency and disciplinary competition. To survive, Krisis metamorphosized several times and is now a broad bilingual online journal for intellectual debate and research with a loose relationship with academic philosophy. If it strengthens this identity, it can continue to play an intermediary role between academic research and public debate, in both directions.
format article
author René Boomkens
author_facet René Boomkens
author_sort René Boomkens
title Krisis of het afscheid van de filosofie?
title_short Krisis of het afscheid van de filosofie?
title_full Krisis of het afscheid van de filosofie?
title_fullStr Krisis of het afscheid van de filosofie?
title_full_unstemmed Krisis of het afscheid van de filosofie?
title_sort krisis of het afscheid van de filosofie?
publisher University of Groningen Press
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/0f825a144f834731837ec4b4d2eea099
work_keys_str_mv AT reneboomkens krisisofhetafscheidvandefilosofie
_version_ 1718378969962643456