Variable rather than extreme slow reaction times distinguish brain states during sustained attention

Abstract A common behavioral marker of optimal attention focus is faster responses or reduced response variability. Our previous study found two dominant brain states during sustained attention, and these states differed in their behavioral accuracy and reaction time (RT) variability. However, RT di...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ayumu Yamashita, David Rothlein, Aaron Kucyi, Eve M. Valera, Laura Germine, Jeremy Wilmer, Joseph DeGutis, Michael Esterman
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0f94b68b7bd948c99368e210b43d7387
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0f94b68b7bd948c99368e210b43d7387
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0f94b68b7bd948c99368e210b43d73872021-12-02T16:26:22ZVariable rather than extreme slow reaction times distinguish brain states during sustained attention10.1038/s41598-021-94161-02045-2322https://doaj.org/article/0f94b68b7bd948c99368e210b43d73872021-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94161-0https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract A common behavioral marker of optimal attention focus is faster responses or reduced response variability. Our previous study found two dominant brain states during sustained attention, and these states differed in their behavioral accuracy and reaction time (RT) variability. However, RT distributions are often positively skewed with a long tail (i.e., reflecting occasional slow responses). Therefore, a larger RT variance could also be explained by this long tail rather than the variance around an assumed normal distribution (i.e., reflecting pervasive response instability based on both faster and slower responses). Resolving this ambiguity is important for better understanding mechanisms of sustained attention. Here, using a large dataset of over 20,000 participants who performed a sustained attention task, we first demonstrated the utility of the exGuassian distribution that can decompose RTs into a strategy factor, a variance factor, and a long tail factor. We then investigated which factor(s) differed between the two brain states using fMRI. Across two independent datasets, results indicate unambiguously that the variance factor differs between the two dominant brain states. These findings indicate that ‘suboptimal’ is different from ‘slow’ at the behavior and neural level, and have implications for theoretically and methodologically guiding future sustained attention research.Ayumu YamashitaDavid RothleinAaron KucyiEve M. ValeraLaura GermineJeremy WilmerJoseph DeGutisMichael EstermanNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Ayumu Yamashita
David Rothlein
Aaron Kucyi
Eve M. Valera
Laura Germine
Jeremy Wilmer
Joseph DeGutis
Michael Esterman
Variable rather than extreme slow reaction times distinguish brain states during sustained attention
description Abstract A common behavioral marker of optimal attention focus is faster responses or reduced response variability. Our previous study found two dominant brain states during sustained attention, and these states differed in their behavioral accuracy and reaction time (RT) variability. However, RT distributions are often positively skewed with a long tail (i.e., reflecting occasional slow responses). Therefore, a larger RT variance could also be explained by this long tail rather than the variance around an assumed normal distribution (i.e., reflecting pervasive response instability based on both faster and slower responses). Resolving this ambiguity is important for better understanding mechanisms of sustained attention. Here, using a large dataset of over 20,000 participants who performed a sustained attention task, we first demonstrated the utility of the exGuassian distribution that can decompose RTs into a strategy factor, a variance factor, and a long tail factor. We then investigated which factor(s) differed between the two brain states using fMRI. Across two independent datasets, results indicate unambiguously that the variance factor differs between the two dominant brain states. These findings indicate that ‘suboptimal’ is different from ‘slow’ at the behavior and neural level, and have implications for theoretically and methodologically guiding future sustained attention research.
format article
author Ayumu Yamashita
David Rothlein
Aaron Kucyi
Eve M. Valera
Laura Germine
Jeremy Wilmer
Joseph DeGutis
Michael Esterman
author_facet Ayumu Yamashita
David Rothlein
Aaron Kucyi
Eve M. Valera
Laura Germine
Jeremy Wilmer
Joseph DeGutis
Michael Esterman
author_sort Ayumu Yamashita
title Variable rather than extreme slow reaction times distinguish brain states during sustained attention
title_short Variable rather than extreme slow reaction times distinguish brain states during sustained attention
title_full Variable rather than extreme slow reaction times distinguish brain states during sustained attention
title_fullStr Variable rather than extreme slow reaction times distinguish brain states during sustained attention
title_full_unstemmed Variable rather than extreme slow reaction times distinguish brain states during sustained attention
title_sort variable rather than extreme slow reaction times distinguish brain states during sustained attention
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/0f94b68b7bd948c99368e210b43d7387
work_keys_str_mv AT ayumuyamashita variableratherthanextremeslowreactiontimesdistinguishbrainstatesduringsustainedattention
AT davidrothlein variableratherthanextremeslowreactiontimesdistinguishbrainstatesduringsustainedattention
AT aaronkucyi variableratherthanextremeslowreactiontimesdistinguishbrainstatesduringsustainedattention
AT evemvalera variableratherthanextremeslowreactiontimesdistinguishbrainstatesduringsustainedattention
AT lauragermine variableratherthanextremeslowreactiontimesdistinguishbrainstatesduringsustainedattention
AT jeremywilmer variableratherthanextremeslowreactiontimesdistinguishbrainstatesduringsustainedattention
AT josephdegutis variableratherthanextremeslowreactiontimesdistinguishbrainstatesduringsustainedattention
AT michaelesterman variableratherthanextremeslowreactiontimesdistinguishbrainstatesduringsustainedattention
_version_ 1718384035445604352