Efficacy and safety of a 3-month loteprednol etabonate 0.5% gel taper for routine prophylaxis after photorefractive keratectomy compared to a 3-month prednisolone acetate 1% and fluorometholone 0.1% taper

Mark D Mifflin,1 Brent S Betts,1 P Adam Frederick,2 Jason M Feuerman,3 Carlton R Fenzl,4 Majid Moshirfar,1,5 Brian Zaugg1 1Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 2The Eye Center, Huntsville, AL, 3Eye Institute of Austin, Aus...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mifflin MD, Betts BS, Frederick PA, Feuerman JM, Fenzl CR, Moshirfar M, Zaugg B
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
PRK
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0fbc163f2e3c49249d98106a272eb11a
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0fbc163f2e3c49249d98106a272eb11a
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0fbc163f2e3c49249d98106a272eb11a2021-12-02T05:01:45ZEfficacy and safety of a 3-month loteprednol etabonate 0.5% gel taper for routine prophylaxis after photorefractive keratectomy compared to a 3-month prednisolone acetate 1% and fluorometholone 0.1% taper1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/0fbc163f2e3c49249d98106a272eb11a2017-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/efficacy-and-safety-of-a-3-month-loteprednol-etabonate-05-gel-taper-fo-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Mark D Mifflin,1 Brent S Betts,1 P Adam Frederick,2 Jason M Feuerman,3 Carlton R Fenzl,4 Majid Moshirfar,1,5 Brian Zaugg1 1Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 2The Eye Center, Huntsville, AL, 3Eye Institute of Austin, Austin, TX, 4Eye Surgeons Associates, Bettendorf, IA, 5Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT, USA Purpose: To compare the outcome of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and complications in patients treated with either loteprednol etabonate 0.5% gel or prednisolone acetate 1% suspension and fluorometholone (fml) 0.1% suspension.Setting: John A Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.Design: Prospective, randomized, partially masked trial.Methods: PRK was performed on 261 eyes of 132 participants. Patients were randomized to a postoperative corticosteroid regimen of either loteprednol etabonate 0.5% gel (loteprednol) or prednisolone 1% acetate suspension followed by fluorometholone 0.1% suspension (prednisolone/fml). Primary outcome measures included incidence and grade of postoperative corneal haze and incidence of increased intraocular pressure of 10 mmHg above baseline, or any intraocular pressure over 21 mmHg. Secondary outcome measures included uncorrected distance visual acuity, best corrected distance visual acuity, and manifest refraction spherical equivalent.Results: The incidence of haze in the first 3 months was 2.6% (3/114 eyes) in the loteprednol group and 4.8% (7/147 eyes) in the prednisolone/fml group and was not statistically significant between groups (P=0.37). The incidence of elevated intraocular pressure was 1.8% (2/114 eyes) in the loteprednol group and 4.1% (6/147 eyes) in the prednisolone/fml group, and was not statistically significant between the groups (P=0.12). The mean 3-month postoperative logMAR uncorrected visual acuity was −0.078±0.10 and −0.075±0.09 in the loteprednol and prednisolone/fml groups, respectively (P=0.83).Conclusion: Postoperative corneal haze and elevated intraocular pressure were uncommon in both treatment arms. There was no statistically significant difference between each postoperative regimen. Refractive results were similar and excellent in both treatment arms. A tapered prophylactic regimen of loteprednol 0.5% gel is equally effective to prednisolone 1%/fml 0.1% after PRK. Keywords: PRK, corticosteroid, fluorometholone, loteprednol, lotemax, wavefront optimizedMifflin MDBetts BSFrederick PAFeuerman JMFenzl CRMoshirfar MZaugg BDove Medical PressarticlePRKphotorefractive keratectomyfluorometholoneloteprednollotemaxwavefront optimizedOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 11, Pp 1113-1118 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic PRK
photorefractive keratectomy
fluorometholone
loteprednol
lotemax
wavefront optimized
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle PRK
photorefractive keratectomy
fluorometholone
loteprednol
lotemax
wavefront optimized
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Mifflin MD
Betts BS
Frederick PA
Feuerman JM
Fenzl CR
Moshirfar M
Zaugg B
Efficacy and safety of a 3-month loteprednol etabonate 0.5% gel taper for routine prophylaxis after photorefractive keratectomy compared to a 3-month prednisolone acetate 1% and fluorometholone 0.1% taper
description Mark D Mifflin,1 Brent S Betts,1 P Adam Frederick,2 Jason M Feuerman,3 Carlton R Fenzl,4 Majid Moshirfar,1,5 Brian Zaugg1 1Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 2The Eye Center, Huntsville, AL, 3Eye Institute of Austin, Austin, TX, 4Eye Surgeons Associates, Bettendorf, IA, 5Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT, USA Purpose: To compare the outcome of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and complications in patients treated with either loteprednol etabonate 0.5% gel or prednisolone acetate 1% suspension and fluorometholone (fml) 0.1% suspension.Setting: John A Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.Design: Prospective, randomized, partially masked trial.Methods: PRK was performed on 261 eyes of 132 participants. Patients were randomized to a postoperative corticosteroid regimen of either loteprednol etabonate 0.5% gel (loteprednol) or prednisolone 1% acetate suspension followed by fluorometholone 0.1% suspension (prednisolone/fml). Primary outcome measures included incidence and grade of postoperative corneal haze and incidence of increased intraocular pressure of 10 mmHg above baseline, or any intraocular pressure over 21 mmHg. Secondary outcome measures included uncorrected distance visual acuity, best corrected distance visual acuity, and manifest refraction spherical equivalent.Results: The incidence of haze in the first 3 months was 2.6% (3/114 eyes) in the loteprednol group and 4.8% (7/147 eyes) in the prednisolone/fml group and was not statistically significant between groups (P=0.37). The incidence of elevated intraocular pressure was 1.8% (2/114 eyes) in the loteprednol group and 4.1% (6/147 eyes) in the prednisolone/fml group, and was not statistically significant between the groups (P=0.12). The mean 3-month postoperative logMAR uncorrected visual acuity was −0.078±0.10 and −0.075±0.09 in the loteprednol and prednisolone/fml groups, respectively (P=0.83).Conclusion: Postoperative corneal haze and elevated intraocular pressure were uncommon in both treatment arms. There was no statistically significant difference between each postoperative regimen. Refractive results were similar and excellent in both treatment arms. A tapered prophylactic regimen of loteprednol 0.5% gel is equally effective to prednisolone 1%/fml 0.1% after PRK. Keywords: PRK, corticosteroid, fluorometholone, loteprednol, lotemax, wavefront optimized
format article
author Mifflin MD
Betts BS
Frederick PA
Feuerman JM
Fenzl CR
Moshirfar M
Zaugg B
author_facet Mifflin MD
Betts BS
Frederick PA
Feuerman JM
Fenzl CR
Moshirfar M
Zaugg B
author_sort Mifflin MD
title Efficacy and safety of a 3-month loteprednol etabonate 0.5% gel taper for routine prophylaxis after photorefractive keratectomy compared to a 3-month prednisolone acetate 1% and fluorometholone 0.1% taper
title_short Efficacy and safety of a 3-month loteprednol etabonate 0.5% gel taper for routine prophylaxis after photorefractive keratectomy compared to a 3-month prednisolone acetate 1% and fluorometholone 0.1% taper
title_full Efficacy and safety of a 3-month loteprednol etabonate 0.5% gel taper for routine prophylaxis after photorefractive keratectomy compared to a 3-month prednisolone acetate 1% and fluorometholone 0.1% taper
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of a 3-month loteprednol etabonate 0.5% gel taper for routine prophylaxis after photorefractive keratectomy compared to a 3-month prednisolone acetate 1% and fluorometholone 0.1% taper
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of a 3-month loteprednol etabonate 0.5% gel taper for routine prophylaxis after photorefractive keratectomy compared to a 3-month prednisolone acetate 1% and fluorometholone 0.1% taper
title_sort efficacy and safety of a 3-month loteprednol etabonate 0.5% gel taper for routine prophylaxis after photorefractive keratectomy compared to a 3-month prednisolone acetate 1% and fluorometholone 0.1% taper
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/0fbc163f2e3c49249d98106a272eb11a
work_keys_str_mv AT mifflinmd efficacyandsafetyofa3monthloteprednoletabonate05geltaperforroutineprophylaxisafterphotorefractivekeratectomycomparedtoa3monthprednisoloneacetate1andfluorometholone01taper
AT bettsbs efficacyandsafetyofa3monthloteprednoletabonate05geltaperforroutineprophylaxisafterphotorefractivekeratectomycomparedtoa3monthprednisoloneacetate1andfluorometholone01taper
AT frederickpa efficacyandsafetyofa3monthloteprednoletabonate05geltaperforroutineprophylaxisafterphotorefractivekeratectomycomparedtoa3monthprednisoloneacetate1andfluorometholone01taper
AT feuermanjm efficacyandsafetyofa3monthloteprednoletabonate05geltaperforroutineprophylaxisafterphotorefractivekeratectomycomparedtoa3monthprednisoloneacetate1andfluorometholone01taper
AT fenzlcr efficacyandsafetyofa3monthloteprednoletabonate05geltaperforroutineprophylaxisafterphotorefractivekeratectomycomparedtoa3monthprednisoloneacetate1andfluorometholone01taper
AT moshirfarm efficacyandsafetyofa3monthloteprednoletabonate05geltaperforroutineprophylaxisafterphotorefractivekeratectomycomparedtoa3monthprednisoloneacetate1andfluorometholone01taper
AT zauggb efficacyandsafetyofa3monthloteprednoletabonate05geltaperforroutineprophylaxisafterphotorefractivekeratectomycomparedtoa3monthprednisoloneacetate1andfluorometholone01taper
_version_ 1718400753695981568