A comparative study of the efficacy of WaveOne and NeoEndo retreatment file system for the removal of gutta percha from the root canal

Background: Teeth with apical periodontitis that either persisted or developed after initial root canal treatment is most often indicated for retreatment procedure. The present study was conducted to compare the WaveOne and NeoEndo retreatment file system for the removal of gutta-percha from the roo...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Shweta V Sagare, Padma Chandra, Tawanpreet Kaur, Onkar Ganorkar, Abhijeet Khade, Sachin Dev Mehta
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021
Materias:	neoendo retreatment system waveone Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/0fd1e99ae8ca4cc8991e1d431e66a2e9
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:0fd1e99ae8ca4cc8991e1d431e66a2e9
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:0fd1e99ae8ca4cc8991e1d431e66a2e92021-11-19T12:15:53ZA comparative study of the efficacy of WaveOne and NeoEndo retreatment file system for the removal of gutta percha from the root canal0975-740610.4103/jpbs.jpbs_406_21https://doaj.org/article/0fd1e99ae8ca4cc8991e1d431e66a2e92021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=6;spage=1682;epage=1685;aulast=Sagarehttps://doaj.org/toc/0975-7406Background: Teeth with apical periodontitis that either persisted or developed after initial root canal treatment is most often indicated for retreatment procedure. The present study was conducted to compare the WaveOne and NeoEndo retreatment file system for the removal of gutta-percha from the root canal. Materials and Methods: Fifty extracted mandibular first premolars with single straight roots were divided into two groups, Group I-WaveOne and Group II-NeoEndo. All samples were scanned with cone-beam computed tomography after the root filling and retreatment procedures. The decrease in the volume of filling material after each retreatment protocol was measured. Results: The mean volume of gutta-percha in Group I before retreatment was 5.6 and in Group II was 5.3, after retreatment in Group I was 2.7, and in Group II was 4.2. The mean percentage reduction in Group I was 45.2% and in Group II was 23.8%. The difference was significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Both systems failed to completely remove gutta-percha. WaveOne was significantly more effective than the NeoEndo retreatment system.Shweta V SagarePadma ChandraTawanpreet KaurOnkar GanorkarAbhijeet KhadeSachin Dev MehtaWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsarticleneoendoretreatment systemwaveonePharmacy and materia medicaRS1-441Analytical chemistryQD71-142ENJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, Vol 13, Iss 6, Pp 1682-1685 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	neoendo retreatment system waveone Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142
spellingShingle	neoendo retreatment system waveone Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142 Shweta V Sagare Padma Chandra Tawanpreet Kaur Onkar Ganorkar Abhijeet Khade Sachin Dev Mehta A comparative study of the efficacy of WaveOne and NeoEndo retreatment file system for the removal of gutta percha from the root canal
description	Background: Teeth with apical periodontitis that either persisted or developed after initial root canal treatment is most often indicated for retreatment procedure. The present study was conducted to compare the WaveOne and NeoEndo retreatment file system for the removal of gutta-percha from the root canal. Materials and Methods: Fifty extracted mandibular first premolars with single straight roots were divided into two groups, Group I-WaveOne and Group II-NeoEndo. All samples were scanned with cone-beam computed tomography after the root filling and retreatment procedures. The decrease in the volume of filling material after each retreatment protocol was measured. Results: The mean volume of gutta-percha in Group I before retreatment was 5.6 and in Group II was 5.3, after retreatment in Group I was 2.7, and in Group II was 4.2. The mean percentage reduction in Group I was 45.2% and in Group II was 23.8%. The difference was significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Both systems failed to completely remove gutta-percha. WaveOne was significantly more effective than the NeoEndo retreatment system.
format	article
author	Shweta V Sagare Padma Chandra Tawanpreet Kaur Onkar Ganorkar Abhijeet Khade Sachin Dev Mehta
author_facet	Shweta V Sagare Padma Chandra Tawanpreet Kaur Onkar Ganorkar Abhijeet Khade Sachin Dev Mehta
author_sort	Shweta V Sagare
title	A comparative study of the efficacy of WaveOne and NeoEndo retreatment file system for the removal of gutta percha from the root canal
title_short	A comparative study of the efficacy of WaveOne and NeoEndo retreatment file system for the removal of gutta percha from the root canal
title_full	A comparative study of the efficacy of WaveOne and NeoEndo retreatment file system for the removal of gutta percha from the root canal
title_fullStr	A comparative study of the efficacy of WaveOne and NeoEndo retreatment file system for the removal of gutta percha from the root canal
title_full_unstemmed	A comparative study of the efficacy of WaveOne and NeoEndo retreatment file system for the removal of gutta percha from the root canal
title_sort	comparative study of the efficacy of waveone and neoendo retreatment file system for the removal of gutta percha from the root canal
publisher	Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/0fd1e99ae8ca4cc8991e1d431e66a2e9
work_keys_str_mv	AT shwetavsagare acomparativestudyoftheefficacyofwaveoneandneoendoretreatmentfilesystemfortheremovalofguttaperchafromtherootcanal AT padmachandra acomparativestudyoftheefficacyofwaveoneandneoendoretreatmentfilesystemfortheremovalofguttaperchafromtherootcanal AT tawanpreetkaur acomparativestudyoftheefficacyofwaveoneandneoendoretreatmentfilesystemfortheremovalofguttaperchafromtherootcanal AT onkarganorkar acomparativestudyoftheefficacyofwaveoneandneoendoretreatmentfilesystemfortheremovalofguttaperchafromtherootcanal AT abhijeetkhade acomparativestudyoftheefficacyofwaveoneandneoendoretreatmentfilesystemfortheremovalofguttaperchafromtherootcanal AT sachindevmehta acomparativestudyoftheefficacyofwaveoneandneoendoretreatmentfilesystemfortheremovalofguttaperchafromtherootcanal AT shwetavsagare comparativestudyoftheefficacyofwaveoneandneoendoretreatmentfilesystemfortheremovalofguttaperchafromtherootcanal AT padmachandra comparativestudyoftheefficacyofwaveoneandneoendoretreatmentfilesystemfortheremovalofguttaperchafromtherootcanal AT tawanpreetkaur comparativestudyoftheefficacyofwaveoneandneoendoretreatmentfilesystemfortheremovalofguttaperchafromtherootcanal AT onkarganorkar comparativestudyoftheefficacyofwaveoneandneoendoretreatmentfilesystemfortheremovalofguttaperchafromtherootcanal AT abhijeetkhade comparativestudyoftheefficacyofwaveoneandneoendoretreatmentfilesystemfortheremovalofguttaperchafromtherootcanal AT sachindevmehta comparativestudyoftheefficacyofwaveoneandneoendoretreatmentfilesystemfortheremovalofguttaperchafromtherootcanal
_version_	1718420112872046592

A comparative study of the efficacy of WaveOne and NeoEndo retreatment file system for the removal of gutta percha from the root canal

Ejemplares similares