Effectiveness of chest physiotherapy in infants hospitalized with acute bronchiolitis: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.

<h4>Background</h4>Acute bronchiolitis treatment in children and infants is largely supportive, but chest physiotherapy is routinely performed in some countries. In France, national guidelines recommend a specific type of physiotherapy combining the increased exhalation technique (IET) a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vincent Gajdos, Sandrine Katsahian, Nicole Beydon, Véronique Abadie, Loïc de Pontual, Sophie Larrar, Ralph Epaud, Bertrand Chevallier, Sylvain Bailleux, Alix Mollet-Boudjemline, Jean Bouyer, Sylvie Chevret, Philippe Labrune
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2010
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/0feadb2c91b24b0cb0d6981c4db08ec4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:0feadb2c91b24b0cb0d6981c4db08ec4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:0feadb2c91b24b0cb0d6981c4db08ec42021-11-18T05:42:03ZEffectiveness of chest physiotherapy in infants hospitalized with acute bronchiolitis: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.1549-12771549-167610.1371/journal.pmed.1000345https://doaj.org/article/0feadb2c91b24b0cb0d6981c4db08ec42010-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/20927359/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1549-1277https://doaj.org/toc/1549-1676<h4>Background</h4>Acute bronchiolitis treatment in children and infants is largely supportive, but chest physiotherapy is routinely performed in some countries. In France, national guidelines recommend a specific type of physiotherapy combining the increased exhalation technique (IET) and assisted cough (AC). Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of chest physiotherapy (IET + AC) in previously healthy infants hospitalized for a first episode of acute bronchiolitis.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>We conducted a multicenter, randomized, outcome assessor-blind and parent-blind trial in seven French pediatric departments. We recruited 496 infants hospitalized for first-episode acute bronchiolitis between October 2004 and January 2008. Patients were randomly allocated to receive from physiotherapists three times a day, either IET + AC (intervention group, n=246) or nasal suction (NS, control group, n=250). Only physiotherapists were aware of the allocation group of the infant. The primary outcome was time to recovery, defined as 8 hours without oxygen supplementation associated with minimal or no chest recession, and ingesting more than two-thirds of daily food requirements. Secondary outcomes were intensive care unit admissions, artificial ventilation, antibiotic treatment, description of side effects during procedures, and parental perception of comfort. Statistical analysis was performed on an intent-to-treat basis. Median time to recovery was 2.31 days, (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.97-2.73) for the control group and 2.02 days (95% CI 1.96-2.34) for the intervention group, indicating no significant effect of physiotherapy (hazard ratio [HR]=1.09, 95% CI 0.91-1.31, p=0.33). No treatment by age interaction was found (p=0.97). Frequency of vomiting and transient respiratory destabilization was higher in the IET + AC group during the procedure (relative risk [RR]=10.2, 95% CI 1.3-78.8, p=0.005 and RR=5.4, 95% CI 1.6-18.4, p=0.002, respectively). No difference between groups in bradycardia with or without desaturation (RR=1.0, 95% CI 0.2-5.0, p=1.00 and RR=3.6, 95% CI 0.7-16.9, p=0.10, respectively) was found during the procedure. Parents reported that the procedure was more arduous in the group treated with IET (mean difference=0.88, 95% CI 0.33-1.44, p=0.002), whereas there was no difference regarding the assessment of the child's comfort between both groups (mean difference=-0.07, 95% CI -0.53 to 0.38, p=0.40). No evidence of differences between groups in intensive care admission (RR=0.7, 95% CI 0.3-1.8, p=0.62), ventilatory support (RR=2.5, 95% CI 0.5-13.0, p=0.29), and antibiotic treatment (RR=1.0, 95% CI 0.7-1.3, p=1.00) was observed.<h4>Conclusions</h4>IET + AC had no significant effect on time to recovery in this group of hospitalized infants with bronchiolitis. Additional studies are required to explore the effect of chest physiotherapy on ambulatory populations and for infants without a history of atopy.<h4>Trial registration</h4>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00125450.Vincent GajdosSandrine KatsahianNicole BeydonVéronique AbadieLoïc de PontualSophie LarrarRalph EpaudBertrand ChevallierSylvain BailleuxAlix Mollet-BoudjemlineJean BouyerSylvie ChevretPhilippe LabrunePublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRENPLoS Medicine, Vol 7, Iss 9, p e1000345 (2010)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Vincent Gajdos
Sandrine Katsahian
Nicole Beydon
Véronique Abadie
Loïc de Pontual
Sophie Larrar
Ralph Epaud
Bertrand Chevallier
Sylvain Bailleux
Alix Mollet-Boudjemline
Jean Bouyer
Sylvie Chevret
Philippe Labrune
Effectiveness of chest physiotherapy in infants hospitalized with acute bronchiolitis: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.
description <h4>Background</h4>Acute bronchiolitis treatment in children and infants is largely supportive, but chest physiotherapy is routinely performed in some countries. In France, national guidelines recommend a specific type of physiotherapy combining the increased exhalation technique (IET) and assisted cough (AC). Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of chest physiotherapy (IET + AC) in previously healthy infants hospitalized for a first episode of acute bronchiolitis.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>We conducted a multicenter, randomized, outcome assessor-blind and parent-blind trial in seven French pediatric departments. We recruited 496 infants hospitalized for first-episode acute bronchiolitis between October 2004 and January 2008. Patients were randomly allocated to receive from physiotherapists three times a day, either IET + AC (intervention group, n=246) or nasal suction (NS, control group, n=250). Only physiotherapists were aware of the allocation group of the infant. The primary outcome was time to recovery, defined as 8 hours without oxygen supplementation associated with minimal or no chest recession, and ingesting more than two-thirds of daily food requirements. Secondary outcomes were intensive care unit admissions, artificial ventilation, antibiotic treatment, description of side effects during procedures, and parental perception of comfort. Statistical analysis was performed on an intent-to-treat basis. Median time to recovery was 2.31 days, (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.97-2.73) for the control group and 2.02 days (95% CI 1.96-2.34) for the intervention group, indicating no significant effect of physiotherapy (hazard ratio [HR]=1.09, 95% CI 0.91-1.31, p=0.33). No treatment by age interaction was found (p=0.97). Frequency of vomiting and transient respiratory destabilization was higher in the IET + AC group during the procedure (relative risk [RR]=10.2, 95% CI 1.3-78.8, p=0.005 and RR=5.4, 95% CI 1.6-18.4, p=0.002, respectively). No difference between groups in bradycardia with or without desaturation (RR=1.0, 95% CI 0.2-5.0, p=1.00 and RR=3.6, 95% CI 0.7-16.9, p=0.10, respectively) was found during the procedure. Parents reported that the procedure was more arduous in the group treated with IET (mean difference=0.88, 95% CI 0.33-1.44, p=0.002), whereas there was no difference regarding the assessment of the child's comfort between both groups (mean difference=-0.07, 95% CI -0.53 to 0.38, p=0.40). No evidence of differences between groups in intensive care admission (RR=0.7, 95% CI 0.3-1.8, p=0.62), ventilatory support (RR=2.5, 95% CI 0.5-13.0, p=0.29), and antibiotic treatment (RR=1.0, 95% CI 0.7-1.3, p=1.00) was observed.<h4>Conclusions</h4>IET + AC had no significant effect on time to recovery in this group of hospitalized infants with bronchiolitis. Additional studies are required to explore the effect of chest physiotherapy on ambulatory populations and for infants without a history of atopy.<h4>Trial registration</h4>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00125450.
format article
author Vincent Gajdos
Sandrine Katsahian
Nicole Beydon
Véronique Abadie
Loïc de Pontual
Sophie Larrar
Ralph Epaud
Bertrand Chevallier
Sylvain Bailleux
Alix Mollet-Boudjemline
Jean Bouyer
Sylvie Chevret
Philippe Labrune
author_facet Vincent Gajdos
Sandrine Katsahian
Nicole Beydon
Véronique Abadie
Loïc de Pontual
Sophie Larrar
Ralph Epaud
Bertrand Chevallier
Sylvain Bailleux
Alix Mollet-Boudjemline
Jean Bouyer
Sylvie Chevret
Philippe Labrune
author_sort Vincent Gajdos
title Effectiveness of chest physiotherapy in infants hospitalized with acute bronchiolitis: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.
title_short Effectiveness of chest physiotherapy in infants hospitalized with acute bronchiolitis: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.
title_full Effectiveness of chest physiotherapy in infants hospitalized with acute bronchiolitis: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.
title_fullStr Effectiveness of chest physiotherapy in infants hospitalized with acute bronchiolitis: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of chest physiotherapy in infants hospitalized with acute bronchiolitis: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.
title_sort effectiveness of chest physiotherapy in infants hospitalized with acute bronchiolitis: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2010
url https://doaj.org/article/0feadb2c91b24b0cb0d6981c4db08ec4
work_keys_str_mv AT vincentgajdos effectivenessofchestphysiotherapyininfantshospitalizedwithacutebronchiolitisamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sandrinekatsahian effectivenessofchestphysiotherapyininfantshospitalizedwithacutebronchiolitisamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nicolebeydon effectivenessofchestphysiotherapyininfantshospitalizedwithacutebronchiolitisamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT veroniqueabadie effectivenessofchestphysiotherapyininfantshospitalizedwithacutebronchiolitisamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT loicdepontual effectivenessofchestphysiotherapyininfantshospitalizedwithacutebronchiolitisamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sophielarrar effectivenessofchestphysiotherapyininfantshospitalizedwithacutebronchiolitisamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ralphepaud effectivenessofchestphysiotherapyininfantshospitalizedwithacutebronchiolitisamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bertrandchevallier effectivenessofchestphysiotherapyininfantshospitalizedwithacutebronchiolitisamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sylvainbailleux effectivenessofchestphysiotherapyininfantshospitalizedwithacutebronchiolitisamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT alixmolletboudjemline effectivenessofchestphysiotherapyininfantshospitalizedwithacutebronchiolitisamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jeanbouyer effectivenessofchestphysiotherapyininfantshospitalizedwithacutebronchiolitisamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sylviechevret effectivenessofchestphysiotherapyininfantshospitalizedwithacutebronchiolitisamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT philippelabrune effectivenessofchestphysiotherapyininfantshospitalizedwithacutebronchiolitisamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1718424833916665856