Comparison of nonlinear static analysis of Iranian standard 2800 with ASCE/SEI 41-13 in intermediate MRF RC buildings

One of the simplified methods, which is progressing and completing every day, is a nonlinear static analysis that can directly evaluate the performance of a structure in any limit state and provide information about the nonlinear behavior of the structure, and it also does not have the complexity of...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Bahador Habibi PourZare, عبدالحسین فلاحی, Arjang Sadeghi
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	FA
Publicado:	Iranian Society of Structrual Engineering (ISSE) 2021
Materias:	nonlinear static analysis nonlinear dynamic analysis adaptive pushover nonlinear time history analysis reinforced concrete structure Bridge engineering TG1-470 Building construction TH1-9745
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/100ee41490e24eec8965d4c675052774
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:100ee41490e24eec8965d4c675052774
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:100ee41490e24eec8965d4c6750527742021-11-08T15:54:19ZComparison of nonlinear static analysis of Iranian standard 2800 with ASCE/SEI 41-13 in intermediate MRF RC buildings2476-39772538-261610.22065/jsce.2019.148234.1679https://doaj.org/article/100ee41490e24eec8965d4c6750527742021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.jsce.ir/article_85709_8c81d5b32235ca181646254ecf569416.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2476-3977https://doaj.org/toc/2538-2616One of the simplified methods, which is progressing and completing every day, is a nonlinear static analysis that can directly evaluate the performance of a structure in any limit state and provide information about the nonlinear behavior of the structure, and it also does not have the complexity of nonlinear dynamic analysis. In this study, the structural responses of nonlinear static procedure (NSP) based on standard 2800 were compared with ASCE 41-13 code and displacement -based adaptive pushover (DAP) method in three models of reinforced concrete structures including the 3, 7 and 10 story with medium ductility. In order to study the accuracy of nonlinear static analysis and seismic behavior of structures, nonlinear time history analysis (NTHA) which is the most accurate method in seismic assessment of structures was conducted.The results show that in 3 and 10 story the NSP according to standard 2800 with forces distribution obtained from the spectral dynamical analysis is more accurate than other NSPs in evaluating of story drifts ratio and maximum displacement along the height of buildings. In 7 story, displacement -based adaptive pushover (DAP) method can be estimated story drift ratio more precisely. In 3 and 10 story, the NSP based on 2800 with forces distribution obtained from the spectral dynamical analysis, can estimate the mean story drifts with a lower percentage error. According to the results, in each three model the uniform distribution of nonlinear static procedure (NSP) based on standard 2800 estimates the story drifts with less accuracy and high error. As a suggestion, nonlinear static analysis based on uniform distribution can be eliminated from the standard 2800.Bahador Habibi PourZareعبدالحسین فلاحیArjang SadeghiIranian Society of Structrual Engineering (ISSE)articlenonlinear static analysisnonlinear dynamic analysisadaptive pushovernonlinear time history analysisreinforced concrete structureBridge engineeringTG1-470Building constructionTH1-9745FAJournal of Structural and Construction Engineering, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 193-219 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	FA
topic	nonlinear static analysis nonlinear dynamic analysis adaptive pushover nonlinear time history analysis reinforced concrete structure Bridge engineering TG1-470 Building construction TH1-9745
spellingShingle	nonlinear static analysis nonlinear dynamic analysis adaptive pushover nonlinear time history analysis reinforced concrete structure Bridge engineering TG1-470 Building construction TH1-9745 Bahador Habibi PourZare عبدالحسین فلاحی Arjang Sadeghi Comparison of nonlinear static analysis of Iranian standard 2800 with ASCE/SEI 41-13 in intermediate MRF RC buildings
description	One of the simplified methods, which is progressing and completing every day, is a nonlinear static analysis that can directly evaluate the performance of a structure in any limit state and provide information about the nonlinear behavior of the structure, and it also does not have the complexity of nonlinear dynamic analysis. In this study, the structural responses of nonlinear static procedure (NSP) based on standard 2800 were compared with ASCE 41-13 code and displacement -based adaptive pushover (DAP) method in three models of reinforced concrete structures including the 3, 7 and 10 story with medium ductility. In order to study the accuracy of nonlinear static analysis and seismic behavior of structures, nonlinear time history analysis (NTHA) which is the most accurate method in seismic assessment of structures was conducted.The results show that in 3 and 10 story the NSP according to standard 2800 with forces distribution obtained from the spectral dynamical analysis is more accurate than other NSPs in evaluating of story drifts ratio and maximum displacement along the height of buildings. In 7 story, displacement -based adaptive pushover (DAP) method can be estimated story drift ratio more precisely. In 3 and 10 story, the NSP based on 2800 with forces distribution obtained from the spectral dynamical analysis, can estimate the mean story drifts with a lower percentage error. According to the results, in each three model the uniform distribution of nonlinear static procedure (NSP) based on standard 2800 estimates the story drifts with less accuracy and high error. As a suggestion, nonlinear static analysis based on uniform distribution can be eliminated from the standard 2800.
format	article
author	Bahador Habibi PourZare عبدالحسین فلاحی Arjang Sadeghi
author_facet	Bahador Habibi PourZare عبدالحسین فلاحی Arjang Sadeghi
author_sort	Bahador Habibi PourZare
title	Comparison of nonlinear static analysis of Iranian standard 2800 with ASCE/SEI 41-13 in intermediate MRF RC buildings
title_short	Comparison of nonlinear static analysis of Iranian standard 2800 with ASCE/SEI 41-13 in intermediate MRF RC buildings
title_full	Comparison of nonlinear static analysis of Iranian standard 2800 with ASCE/SEI 41-13 in intermediate MRF RC buildings
title_fullStr	Comparison of nonlinear static analysis of Iranian standard 2800 with ASCE/SEI 41-13 in intermediate MRF RC buildings
title_full_unstemmed	Comparison of nonlinear static analysis of Iranian standard 2800 with ASCE/SEI 41-13 in intermediate MRF RC buildings
title_sort	comparison of nonlinear static analysis of iranian standard 2800 with asce/sei 41-13 in intermediate mrf rc buildings
publisher	Iranian Society of Structrual Engineering (ISSE)
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/100ee41490e24eec8965d4c675052774
work_keys_str_mv	AT bahadorhabibipourzare comparisonofnonlinearstaticanalysisofiranianstandard2800withascesei4113inintermediatemrfrcbuildings AT ʿbdạlḥsynflạḥy comparisonofnonlinearstaticanalysisofiranianstandard2800withascesei4113inintermediatemrfrcbuildings AT arjangsadeghi comparisonofnonlinearstaticanalysisofiranianstandard2800withascesei4113inintermediatemrfrcbuildings
_version_	1718441544513486848

Comparison of nonlinear static analysis of Iranian standard 2800 with ASCE/SEI 41-13 in intermediate MRF RC buildings

Ejemplares similares