Comparison of Triage Effectiveness Based on ESI and HEART Scale in Diagnosis of Outcome in Patients with Chest Pain

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Chest pain is one of the common causes of emergency department visit, but only 25-15% of them are diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, unexplained cases of ACS have led to high mortality rates. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of ESI...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: R Gharaee, S Zohari Anboohi, H Shiri, M Nasiri
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FA
Publicado: Babol University of Medical Sciences 2019
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/107c2bc9bb9047229efb36695150855b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:107c2bc9bb9047229efb36695150855b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:107c2bc9bb9047229efb36695150855b2021-11-10T08:30:37ZComparison of Triage Effectiveness Based on ESI and HEART Scale in Diagnosis of Outcome in Patients with Chest Pain1561-41072251-7170https://doaj.org/article/107c2bc9bb9047229efb36695150855b2019-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://jbums.org/article-1-8253-en.htmlhttps://doaj.org/toc/1561-4107https://doaj.org/toc/2251-7170BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Chest pain is one of the common causes of emergency department visit, but only 25-15% of them are diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, unexplained cases of ACS have led to high mortality rates. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of ESI triage (Emergency Severity Index) and HEART scale (Chest Pain Diagnostic Scale) in detecting the outcome of patients with complaints of chest pain. METHODS: This descriptive study was performed on 200 patients with chest pain in emergency department of selected hospitals of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in 2017. The ESI triage form, HEART and demographic information were completed for all patients. Six weeks later patients were re-evaluated in terms of heart problems. FINDINGS: The compliance of the ESI triage and HEART scale in the high-risk group was 27.9% (24 people), the middle-risk group was 79% (62 people) and the low-risk group (30.6%) (11 people). In general, comparing the total scores, these two scales were consistent with 48%. Also, after considering the cut-off point 4.5, the sensitivity 85% and the specificity 89% with a 95% confidence interval for the HEART scale and sensitivity 95%, and the specificity 25% with a 95% confidence interval was found for the ESI triage. CONCLUSION: According to the results of this study, despite its wide range, the ESI triage has shown a poor performance over the HEART scale. Therefore, the use of the combined HEART triage ESI scale can be very helpful.R GharaeeS Zohari AnboohiH ShiriM NasiriBabol University of Medical Sciencesarticlechest paintriageacute coronary syndromeMedicineRMedicine (General)R5-920ENFAMajallah-i Dānishgāh-i ̒Ulūm-i Pizishkī-i Bābul, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 299-305 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FA
topic chest pain
triage
acute coronary syndrome
Medicine
R
Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle chest pain
triage
acute coronary syndrome
Medicine
R
Medicine (General)
R5-920
R Gharaee
S Zohari Anboohi
H Shiri
M Nasiri
Comparison of Triage Effectiveness Based on ESI and HEART Scale in Diagnosis of Outcome in Patients with Chest Pain
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Chest pain is one of the common causes of emergency department visit, but only 25-15% of them are diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, unexplained cases of ACS have led to high mortality rates. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of ESI triage (Emergency Severity Index) and HEART scale (Chest Pain Diagnostic Scale) in detecting the outcome of patients with complaints of chest pain. METHODS: This descriptive study was performed on 200 patients with chest pain in emergency department of selected hospitals of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in 2017. The ESI triage form, HEART and demographic information were completed for all patients. Six weeks later patients were re-evaluated in terms of heart problems. FINDINGS: The compliance of the ESI triage and HEART scale in the high-risk group was 27.9% (24 people), the middle-risk group was 79% (62 people) and the low-risk group (30.6%) (11 people). In general, comparing the total scores, these two scales were consistent with 48%. Also, after considering the cut-off point 4.5, the sensitivity 85% and the specificity 89% with a 95% confidence interval for the HEART scale and sensitivity 95%, and the specificity 25% with a 95% confidence interval was found for the ESI triage. CONCLUSION: According to the results of this study, despite its wide range, the ESI triage has shown a poor performance over the HEART scale. Therefore, the use of the combined HEART triage ESI scale can be very helpful.
format article
author R Gharaee
S Zohari Anboohi
H Shiri
M Nasiri
author_facet R Gharaee
S Zohari Anboohi
H Shiri
M Nasiri
author_sort R Gharaee
title Comparison of Triage Effectiveness Based on ESI and HEART Scale in Diagnosis of Outcome in Patients with Chest Pain
title_short Comparison of Triage Effectiveness Based on ESI and HEART Scale in Diagnosis of Outcome in Patients with Chest Pain
title_full Comparison of Triage Effectiveness Based on ESI and HEART Scale in Diagnosis of Outcome in Patients with Chest Pain
title_fullStr Comparison of Triage Effectiveness Based on ESI and HEART Scale in Diagnosis of Outcome in Patients with Chest Pain
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Triage Effectiveness Based on ESI and HEART Scale in Diagnosis of Outcome in Patients with Chest Pain
title_sort comparison of triage effectiveness based on esi and heart scale in diagnosis of outcome in patients with chest pain
publisher Babol University of Medical Sciences
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/107c2bc9bb9047229efb36695150855b
work_keys_str_mv AT rgharaee comparisonoftriageeffectivenessbasedonesiandheartscaleindiagnosisofoutcomeinpatientswithchestpain
AT szoharianboohi comparisonoftriageeffectivenessbasedonesiandheartscaleindiagnosisofoutcomeinpatientswithchestpain
AT hshiri comparisonoftriageeffectivenessbasedonesiandheartscaleindiagnosisofoutcomeinpatientswithchestpain
AT mnasiri comparisonoftriageeffectivenessbasedonesiandheartscaleindiagnosisofoutcomeinpatientswithchestpain
_version_ 1718440348797108224