Examining the relation of correct knowledge and misconceptions using the nominal response model
This study reports an analysis of the Force Concept Inventory (FCI) using item response curves (IRC)—the fraction of students selecting each response to an item as a function of their total score. Three large samples (N=9606, 4360, and 1439) of calculus-based physics students were analyzed. These we...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | John Stewart, Byron Drury, James Wells, Aaron Adair, Rachel Henderson, Yunfei Ma, Ángel Pérez-Lemonche, David Pritchard |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
American Physical Society
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/10918c4ba8814cffb9eaad812c0880a5 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Extending modified module analysis to include correct responses: Analysis of the Force Concept Inventory
por: Jie Yang, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Possible misconceptions about solid friction
por: Hasan Şahin Kızılcık, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Prevalence and Persistence of Misconceptions in Tree Thinking
por: Tyler A. Kummer, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Applying module analysis to the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism
por: Christopher Wheatley, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Identifying physics misconceptions at the circus: The case of circular motion
por: Alexander Volfson, et al.
Publicado: (2020)