Examining the relation of correct knowledge and misconceptions using the nominal response model
This study reports an analysis of the Force Concept Inventory (FCI) using item response curves (IRC)—the fraction of students selecting each response to an item as a function of their total score. Three large samples (N=9606, 4360, and 1439) of calculus-based physics students were analyzed. These we...
Enregistré dans:
Auteurs principaux: | John Stewart, Byron Drury, James Wells, Aaron Adair, Rachel Henderson, Yunfei Ma, Ángel Pérez-Lemonche, David Pritchard |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Langue: | EN |
Publié: |
American Physical Society
2021
|
Sujets: | |
Accès en ligne: | https://doaj.org/article/10918c4ba8814cffb9eaad812c0880a5 |
Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
Documents similaires
-
Extending modified module analysis to include correct responses: Analysis of the Force Concept Inventory
par: Jie Yang, et autres
Publié: (2020) -
Possible misconceptions about solid friction
par: Hasan Şahin Kızılcık, et autres
Publié: (2021) -
Prevalence and Persistence of Misconceptions in Tree Thinking
par: Tyler A. Kummer, et autres
Publié: (2016) -
Applying module analysis to the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism
par: Christopher Wheatley, et autres
Publié: (2021) -
Identifying physics misconceptions at the circus: The case of circular motion
par: Alexander Volfson, et autres
Publié: (2020)