Why the market can’t ensure a free press
When Australia’s Independent Media Inquiry headed by ex-judge Ray Finkelstein released its report on the Australian media in February 2012, if you had been following the media discussion since then, one could not be blamed for thinking that Finkelstein wanted to create a state super cop which would...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Asia Pacific Network
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/10e22f975bed4565adf9f24277a4f661 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:10e22f975bed4565adf9f24277a4f661 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:10e22f975bed4565adf9f24277a4f6612021-12-02T11:51:22ZWhy the market can’t ensure a free press10.24135/pjr.v18i2.2601023-94992324-2035https://doaj.org/article/10e22f975bed4565adf9f24277a4f6612012-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/260https://doaj.org/toc/1023-9499https://doaj.org/toc/2324-2035 When Australia’s Independent Media Inquiry headed by ex-judge Ray Finkelstein released its report on the Australian media in February 2012, if you had been following the media discussion since then, one could not be blamed for thinking that Finkelstein wanted to create a state super cop which would seize control of the media, impose new standards on journalists, dragging every blogger and tweeter into its net. Some media have accused the inquiry report of being ‘leftist’, academic and beyond the comprehension of ordinary people. Part of the media’s job is to explain to the public what is in reports they do not have time to read so they can decide what they think. This commentary was an attempt to do that published by the independent New Matilda online magazine. Wendy BaconAsia Pacific NetworkarticleAccountabilityAustraliaCensorshipDemocracyFinkelstein InquiryMedia freedomCommunication. Mass mediaP87-96Journalism. The periodical press, etc.PN4699-5650ENPacific Journalism Review, Vol 18, Iss 2 (2012) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Accountability Australia Censorship Democracy Finkelstein Inquiry Media freedom Communication. Mass media P87-96 Journalism. The periodical press, etc. PN4699-5650 |
spellingShingle |
Accountability Australia Censorship Democracy Finkelstein Inquiry Media freedom Communication. Mass media P87-96 Journalism. The periodical press, etc. PN4699-5650 Wendy Bacon Why the market can’t ensure a free press |
description |
When Australia’s Independent Media Inquiry headed by ex-judge Ray Finkelstein released its report on the Australian media in February 2012, if you had been following the media discussion since then, one could not be blamed for thinking that Finkelstein wanted to create a state super cop which would seize control of the media, impose new standards on journalists, dragging every blogger and tweeter into its net. Some media have accused the inquiry report of being ‘leftist’, academic and beyond the comprehension of ordinary people. Part of the media’s job is to explain to the public what is in reports they do not have time to read so they can decide what they think. This commentary was an attempt to do that published by the independent New Matilda online magazine.
|
format |
article |
author |
Wendy Bacon |
author_facet |
Wendy Bacon |
author_sort |
Wendy Bacon |
title |
Why the market can’t ensure a free press |
title_short |
Why the market can’t ensure a free press |
title_full |
Why the market can’t ensure a free press |
title_fullStr |
Why the market can’t ensure a free press |
title_full_unstemmed |
Why the market can’t ensure a free press |
title_sort |
why the market can’t ensure a free press |
publisher |
Asia Pacific Network |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/10e22f975bed4565adf9f24277a4f661 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT wendybacon whythemarketcantensureafreepress |
_version_ |
1718395087630630912 |