Improved Classification Models to Distinguish Natural from Anthropic Oil Slicks in the Gulf of Mexico: Seasonality and Radarsat-2 Beam Mode Effects under a Machine Learning Approach
Distinguishing between natural and anthropic oil slicks is a challenging task, especially in the Gulf of Mexico, where these events can be simultaneously observed and recognized as seeps or spills. In this study, a powerful data analysis provided by machine learning (ML) methods was employed to deve...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/10e960cf8b374cba9e7883325556fc1d |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Distinguishing between natural and anthropic oil slicks is a challenging task, especially in the Gulf of Mexico, where these events can be simultaneously observed and recognized as seeps or spills. In this study, a powerful data analysis provided by machine learning (ML) methods was employed to develop, test, and implement a classification model (CM) to distinguish an oil slick source (OSS) as natural or anthropic. A robust database containing 4916 validated oil samples, detected using synthetic aperture radar (SAR), was employed for this task. Six ML algorithms were evaluated, including artificial neural networks (ANN), random forest (RF), decision trees (DT), naive Bayes (NB), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and logistic regression (LR). Using RF, the global CM achieved a maximum accuracy value of 73.15. An innovative approach evaluated how external factors, such as seasonality, satellite configurations, and the synergy between them, limit or improve OSS predictions. To accomplish this, specific classification models (SCMs) were derived from the global ones (CMs), tuning the best algorithms and parameters according to different scenarios. Median accuracies revealed winter and spring to be the best seasons and ScanSAR Narrow B (SCNB) as the best beam mode. The maximum median accuracy to distinguish seeps from spills was achieved in winter using SCNB (83.05). Among the tested algorithms, RF was the most robust, with a better performance in 81% of the investigated scenarios. The accuracy increment provided by the well-fitted models may minimize the confusion between seeps and spills. This represents a concrete contribution to reducing economic and geologic risks derived from exploration activities in offshore areas. Additionally, from an operational standpoint, specific models support specialists to select the best SAR products and seasons for new acquisitions, as well as to optimize performances according to the available data. |
|---|