Problem of Periodization of the World History in Soviet Social Science of the 1920s

The article is devoted to the development of the periodization of world history in Soviet social science of the 1920s. Various options for periodization that existed in the educational literature on this discipline in the specified period are considered. It is noted that Soviet social scientists aba...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: E. P. Emelyanov
Formato: article
Lenguaje:RU
Publicado: Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/11075fc7b6ef48c9af80e3a8b0aaddfb
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:11075fc7b6ef48c9af80e3a8b0aaddfb
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:11075fc7b6ef48c9af80e3a8b0aaddfb2021-12-02T07:58:08ZProblem of Periodization of the World History in Soviet Social Science of the 1920s2225-756X2227-129510.24224/2227-1295-2019-10-380-395https://doaj.org/article/11075fc7b6ef48c9af80e3a8b0aaddfb2019-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/1346https://doaj.org/toc/2225-756Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2227-1295The article is devoted to the development of the periodization of world history in Soviet social science of the 1920s. Various options for periodization that existed in the educational literature on this discipline in the specified period are considered. It is noted that Soviet social scientists abandoned the traditional division of history into Antiquity, the Middle Ages and the New Time and introduced a new approach to the periodization of world history: primitive (including one or two formations in different versions), feudalism, commercial capitalism and industrial capitalism. The methodological basis of this approach associated with the works of K. Marx, E. Meyer and M.N. Pokrovsky is revealed. A hypothesis is proposed according to which such an approach to world history meant the recognition by the Soviet social scientists of the non-linear nature of the historical process and the endowment of historical time with meaningful, class, characteristics. The author of the article believes that these processes in Soviet social science corresponded to a “temporal turn” in European thought of the first third of the twentieth century, characterized by the consideration of time as a process that has semantic content and depends on the subject. It is noted that, despite the return of the terms Antiquity, Middle Ages, and New Time in the 1930s, this periodization already included an idea of the class nature of historical time, which remained in Soviet science until the end of the existence of the USSR.E. P. EmelyanovTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovarticleperiodization of world historysocial sciencehistory of education in the ussrsoviet historical sciencetemporal turnSlavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languagesPG1-9665RUНаучный диалог, Vol 0, Iss 10, Pp 380-395 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language RU
topic periodization of world history
social science
history of education in the ussr
soviet historical science
temporal turn
Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages
PG1-9665
spellingShingle periodization of world history
social science
history of education in the ussr
soviet historical science
temporal turn
Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages
PG1-9665
E. P. Emelyanov
Problem of Periodization of the World History in Soviet Social Science of the 1920s
description The article is devoted to the development of the periodization of world history in Soviet social science of the 1920s. Various options for periodization that existed in the educational literature on this discipline in the specified period are considered. It is noted that Soviet social scientists abandoned the traditional division of history into Antiquity, the Middle Ages and the New Time and introduced a new approach to the periodization of world history: primitive (including one or two formations in different versions), feudalism, commercial capitalism and industrial capitalism. The methodological basis of this approach associated with the works of K. Marx, E. Meyer and M.N. Pokrovsky is revealed. A hypothesis is proposed according to which such an approach to world history meant the recognition by the Soviet social scientists of the non-linear nature of the historical process and the endowment of historical time with meaningful, class, characteristics. The author of the article believes that these processes in Soviet social science corresponded to a “temporal turn” in European thought of the first third of the twentieth century, characterized by the consideration of time as a process that has semantic content and depends on the subject. It is noted that, despite the return of the terms Antiquity, Middle Ages, and New Time in the 1930s, this periodization already included an idea of the class nature of historical time, which remained in Soviet science until the end of the existence of the USSR.
format article
author E. P. Emelyanov
author_facet E. P. Emelyanov
author_sort E. P. Emelyanov
title Problem of Periodization of the World History in Soviet Social Science of the 1920s
title_short Problem of Periodization of the World History in Soviet Social Science of the 1920s
title_full Problem of Periodization of the World History in Soviet Social Science of the 1920s
title_fullStr Problem of Periodization of the World History in Soviet Social Science of the 1920s
title_full_unstemmed Problem of Periodization of the World History in Soviet Social Science of the 1920s
title_sort problem of periodization of the world history in soviet social science of the 1920s
publisher Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/11075fc7b6ef48c9af80e3a8b0aaddfb
work_keys_str_mv AT epemelyanov problemofperiodizationoftheworldhistoryinsovietsocialscienceofthe1920s
_version_ 1718398896294592512