Problem of Periodization of the World History in Soviet Social Science of the 1920s
The article is devoted to the development of the periodization of world history in Soviet social science of the 1920s. Various options for periodization that existed in the educational literature on this discipline in the specified period are considered. It is noted that Soviet social scientists aba...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | RU |
Publicado: |
Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/11075fc7b6ef48c9af80e3a8b0aaddfb |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:11075fc7b6ef48c9af80e3a8b0aaddfb |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:11075fc7b6ef48c9af80e3a8b0aaddfb2021-12-02T07:58:08ZProblem of Periodization of the World History in Soviet Social Science of the 1920s2225-756X2227-129510.24224/2227-1295-2019-10-380-395https://doaj.org/article/11075fc7b6ef48c9af80e3a8b0aaddfb2019-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/1346https://doaj.org/toc/2225-756Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2227-1295The article is devoted to the development of the periodization of world history in Soviet social science of the 1920s. Various options for periodization that existed in the educational literature on this discipline in the specified period are considered. It is noted that Soviet social scientists abandoned the traditional division of history into Antiquity, the Middle Ages and the New Time and introduced a new approach to the periodization of world history: primitive (including one or two formations in different versions), feudalism, commercial capitalism and industrial capitalism. The methodological basis of this approach associated with the works of K. Marx, E. Meyer and M.N. Pokrovsky is revealed. A hypothesis is proposed according to which such an approach to world history meant the recognition by the Soviet social scientists of the non-linear nature of the historical process and the endowment of historical time with meaningful, class, characteristics. The author of the article believes that these processes in Soviet social science corresponded to a “temporal turn” in European thought of the first third of the twentieth century, characterized by the consideration of time as a process that has semantic content and depends on the subject. It is noted that, despite the return of the terms Antiquity, Middle Ages, and New Time in the 1930s, this periodization already included an idea of the class nature of historical time, which remained in Soviet science until the end of the existence of the USSR.E. P. EmelyanovTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovarticleperiodization of world historysocial sciencehistory of education in the ussrsoviet historical sciencetemporal turnSlavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languagesPG1-9665RUНаучный диалог, Vol 0, Iss 10, Pp 380-395 (2019) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
RU |
topic |
periodization of world history social science history of education in the ussr soviet historical science temporal turn Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665 |
spellingShingle |
periodization of world history social science history of education in the ussr soviet historical science temporal turn Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665 E. P. Emelyanov Problem of Periodization of the World History in Soviet Social Science of the 1920s |
description |
The article is devoted to the development of the periodization of world history in Soviet social science of the 1920s. Various options for periodization that existed in the educational literature on this discipline in the specified period are considered. It is noted that Soviet social scientists abandoned the traditional division of history into Antiquity, the Middle Ages and the New Time and introduced a new approach to the periodization of world history: primitive (including one or two formations in different versions), feudalism, commercial capitalism and industrial capitalism. The methodological basis of this approach associated with the works of K. Marx, E. Meyer and M.N. Pokrovsky is revealed. A hypothesis is proposed according to which such an approach to world history meant the recognition by the Soviet social scientists of the non-linear nature of the historical process and the endowment of historical time with meaningful, class, characteristics. The author of the article believes that these processes in Soviet social science corresponded to a “temporal turn” in European thought of the first third of the twentieth century, characterized by the consideration of time as a process that has semantic content and depends on the subject. It is noted that, despite the return of the terms Antiquity, Middle Ages, and New Time in the 1930s, this periodization already included an idea of the class nature of historical time, which remained in Soviet science until the end of the existence of the USSR. |
format |
article |
author |
E. P. Emelyanov |
author_facet |
E. P. Emelyanov |
author_sort |
E. P. Emelyanov |
title |
Problem of Periodization of the World History in Soviet Social Science of the 1920s |
title_short |
Problem of Periodization of the World History in Soviet Social Science of the 1920s |
title_full |
Problem of Periodization of the World History in Soviet Social Science of the 1920s |
title_fullStr |
Problem of Periodization of the World History in Soviet Social Science of the 1920s |
title_full_unstemmed |
Problem of Periodization of the World History in Soviet Social Science of the 1920s |
title_sort |
problem of periodization of the world history in soviet social science of the 1920s |
publisher |
Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/11075fc7b6ef48c9af80e3a8b0aaddfb |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT epemelyanov problemofperiodizationoftheworldhistoryinsovietsocialscienceofthe1920s |
_version_ |
1718398896294592512 |