Silvopastoral system is an alternative to improve animal welfare and productive performance in meat production systems
Abstract Climate change is a reality and global surface temperature is projected to rise substantially in the next 80 years. Agriculture practices will have to adapt to climate change, and also help to mitigate this effect using, among other strategies, forest conservation and management. Silvopasto...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/110d70d2aa2048e38d103c02bc525ae6 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:110d70d2aa2048e38d103c02bc525ae6 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:110d70d2aa2048e38d103c02bc525ae62021-12-02T15:22:56ZSilvopastoral system is an alternative to improve animal welfare and productive performance in meat production systems10.1038/s41598-021-93609-72045-2322https://doaj.org/article/110d70d2aa2048e38d103c02bc525ae62021-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93609-7https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Climate change is a reality and global surface temperature is projected to rise substantially in the next 80 years. Agriculture practices will have to adapt to climate change, and also help to mitigate this effect using, among other strategies, forest conservation and management. Silvopastoral systems have been adopted in tropical climate livestock areas but their benefits on thermal comfort and reproductive performance of beef cows are not completely known. Therefore, our aims were to compare the microclimate of silvopastoral and intensive rotational unshaded grazing systems in different months and to evaluate physiological variables (Exp. 1 and 2), metabolism, and in vitro embryo production (Exp. 2) in crossbred beef females. Our hypothesis is that the silvopastoral system can improve the thermal comfort of beef heifers and cows and, consequently, also improve dry matter intake, body weight gain, and in vitro embryo production when compared to the unshaded rotational grazing system. In Exp 1, the silvopastoral system decreased body temperature and increased welfare and performance of heifers. In Exp. 2, the silvopastoral system enhanced the body weight but did not affect metabolism and the general reproductive performance, but increased the recovery rate of oocytes in primiparous cows.Amanda Prudêncio LemesAlexandre Rossetto GarciaJosé Ricardo Macedo PezzopaneFelipe Zandonadi BrandãoYeda Fumie WatanabeReinaldo Fernandes CookeMariana SponchiadoClaudia Cristina Paro de PazAnnelise Carla CamplesiMario BinelliLindsay Unno GimenesNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-17 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Amanda Prudêncio Lemes Alexandre Rossetto Garcia José Ricardo Macedo Pezzopane Felipe Zandonadi Brandão Yeda Fumie Watanabe Reinaldo Fernandes Cooke Mariana Sponchiado Claudia Cristina Paro de Paz Annelise Carla Camplesi Mario Binelli Lindsay Unno Gimenes Silvopastoral system is an alternative to improve animal welfare and productive performance in meat production systems |
description |
Abstract Climate change is a reality and global surface temperature is projected to rise substantially in the next 80 years. Agriculture practices will have to adapt to climate change, and also help to mitigate this effect using, among other strategies, forest conservation and management. Silvopastoral systems have been adopted in tropical climate livestock areas but their benefits on thermal comfort and reproductive performance of beef cows are not completely known. Therefore, our aims were to compare the microclimate of silvopastoral and intensive rotational unshaded grazing systems in different months and to evaluate physiological variables (Exp. 1 and 2), metabolism, and in vitro embryo production (Exp. 2) in crossbred beef females. Our hypothesis is that the silvopastoral system can improve the thermal comfort of beef heifers and cows and, consequently, also improve dry matter intake, body weight gain, and in vitro embryo production when compared to the unshaded rotational grazing system. In Exp 1, the silvopastoral system decreased body temperature and increased welfare and performance of heifers. In Exp. 2, the silvopastoral system enhanced the body weight but did not affect metabolism and the general reproductive performance, but increased the recovery rate of oocytes in primiparous cows. |
format |
article |
author |
Amanda Prudêncio Lemes Alexandre Rossetto Garcia José Ricardo Macedo Pezzopane Felipe Zandonadi Brandão Yeda Fumie Watanabe Reinaldo Fernandes Cooke Mariana Sponchiado Claudia Cristina Paro de Paz Annelise Carla Camplesi Mario Binelli Lindsay Unno Gimenes |
author_facet |
Amanda Prudêncio Lemes Alexandre Rossetto Garcia José Ricardo Macedo Pezzopane Felipe Zandonadi Brandão Yeda Fumie Watanabe Reinaldo Fernandes Cooke Mariana Sponchiado Claudia Cristina Paro de Paz Annelise Carla Camplesi Mario Binelli Lindsay Unno Gimenes |
author_sort |
Amanda Prudêncio Lemes |
title |
Silvopastoral system is an alternative to improve animal welfare and productive performance in meat production systems |
title_short |
Silvopastoral system is an alternative to improve animal welfare and productive performance in meat production systems |
title_full |
Silvopastoral system is an alternative to improve animal welfare and productive performance in meat production systems |
title_fullStr |
Silvopastoral system is an alternative to improve animal welfare and productive performance in meat production systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
Silvopastoral system is an alternative to improve animal welfare and productive performance in meat production systems |
title_sort |
silvopastoral system is an alternative to improve animal welfare and productive performance in meat production systems |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/110d70d2aa2048e38d103c02bc525ae6 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT amandaprudenciolemes silvopastoralsystemisanalternativetoimproveanimalwelfareandproductiveperformanceinmeatproductionsystems AT alexandrerossettogarcia silvopastoralsystemisanalternativetoimproveanimalwelfareandproductiveperformanceinmeatproductionsystems AT josericardomacedopezzopane silvopastoralsystemisanalternativetoimproveanimalwelfareandproductiveperformanceinmeatproductionsystems AT felipezandonadibrandao silvopastoralsystemisanalternativetoimproveanimalwelfareandproductiveperformanceinmeatproductionsystems AT yedafumiewatanabe silvopastoralsystemisanalternativetoimproveanimalwelfareandproductiveperformanceinmeatproductionsystems AT reinaldofernandescooke silvopastoralsystemisanalternativetoimproveanimalwelfareandproductiveperformanceinmeatproductionsystems AT marianasponchiado silvopastoralsystemisanalternativetoimproveanimalwelfareandproductiveperformanceinmeatproductionsystems AT claudiacristinaparodepaz silvopastoralsystemisanalternativetoimproveanimalwelfareandproductiveperformanceinmeatproductionsystems AT annelisecarlacamplesi silvopastoralsystemisanalternativetoimproveanimalwelfareandproductiveperformanceinmeatproductionsystems AT mariobinelli silvopastoralsystemisanalternativetoimproveanimalwelfareandproductiveperformanceinmeatproductionsystems AT lindsayunnogimenes silvopastoralsystemisanalternativetoimproveanimalwelfareandproductiveperformanceinmeatproductionsystems |
_version_ |
1718387368064450560 |