Initial validation of the general attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale

A new General Attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale (GAAIS) was developed. The scale underwent initial statistical validation via Exploratory Factor Analysis, which identified positive and negative subscales. Both subscales captured emotions in line with their valence. In addition, the pos...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Astrid Schepman, Paul Rodway
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1133d2a61e8b4505bd74f4ec4dd8dbad
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1133d2a61e8b4505bd74f4ec4dd8dbad
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1133d2a61e8b4505bd74f4ec4dd8dbad2021-12-01T05:03:11ZInitial validation of the general attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale2451-958810.1016/j.chbr.2020.100014https://doaj.org/article/1133d2a61e8b4505bd74f4ec4dd8dbad2020-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958820300142https://doaj.org/toc/2451-9588A new General Attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale (GAAIS) was developed. The scale underwent initial statistical validation via Exploratory Factor Analysis, which identified positive and negative subscales. Both subscales captured emotions in line with their valence. In addition, the positive subscale reflected societal and personal utility, whereas the negative subscale reflected concerns. The scale showed good psychometric indices and convergent and discriminant validity against existing measures. To cross-validate general attitudes with attitudes towards specific instances of AI applications, summaries of tasks accomplished by specific applications of Artificial Intelligence were sourced from newspaper articles. These were rated for comfortableness and perceived capability. Comfortableness with specific applications was a strong predictor of general attitudes as measured by the GAAIS, but perceived capability was a weaker predictor. Participants viewed AI applications involving big data (e.g. astronomy, law, pharmacology) positively, but viewed applications for tasks involving human judgement, (e.g. medical treatment, psychological counselling) negatively. Applications with a strong ethical dimension led to stronger discomfort than their rated capabilities would predict. The survey data suggested that people held mixed views of AI. The initially validated two-factor GAAIS to measure General Attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence is included in the Appendix.Astrid SchepmanPaul RodwayElsevierarticleArtificial intelligencePsychometricsQuestionnaireIndexAttitudesPerceptionElectronic computers. Computer scienceQA75.5-76.95PsychologyBF1-990ENComputers in Human Behavior Reports, Vol 1, Iss , Pp 100014- (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Artificial intelligence
Psychometrics
Questionnaire
Index
Attitudes
Perception
Electronic computers. Computer science
QA75.5-76.95
Psychology
BF1-990
spellingShingle Artificial intelligence
Psychometrics
Questionnaire
Index
Attitudes
Perception
Electronic computers. Computer science
QA75.5-76.95
Psychology
BF1-990
Astrid Schepman
Paul Rodway
Initial validation of the general attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale
description A new General Attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale (GAAIS) was developed. The scale underwent initial statistical validation via Exploratory Factor Analysis, which identified positive and negative subscales. Both subscales captured emotions in line with their valence. In addition, the positive subscale reflected societal and personal utility, whereas the negative subscale reflected concerns. The scale showed good psychometric indices and convergent and discriminant validity against existing measures. To cross-validate general attitudes with attitudes towards specific instances of AI applications, summaries of tasks accomplished by specific applications of Artificial Intelligence were sourced from newspaper articles. These were rated for comfortableness and perceived capability. Comfortableness with specific applications was a strong predictor of general attitudes as measured by the GAAIS, but perceived capability was a weaker predictor. Participants viewed AI applications involving big data (e.g. astronomy, law, pharmacology) positively, but viewed applications for tasks involving human judgement, (e.g. medical treatment, psychological counselling) negatively. Applications with a strong ethical dimension led to stronger discomfort than their rated capabilities would predict. The survey data suggested that people held mixed views of AI. The initially validated two-factor GAAIS to measure General Attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence is included in the Appendix.
format article
author Astrid Schepman
Paul Rodway
author_facet Astrid Schepman
Paul Rodway
author_sort Astrid Schepman
title Initial validation of the general attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale
title_short Initial validation of the general attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale
title_full Initial validation of the general attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale
title_fullStr Initial validation of the general attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale
title_full_unstemmed Initial validation of the general attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale
title_sort initial validation of the general attitudes towards artificial intelligence scale
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/1133d2a61e8b4505bd74f4ec4dd8dbad
work_keys_str_mv AT astridschepman initialvalidationofthegeneralattitudestowardsartificialintelligencescale
AT paulrodway initialvalidationofthegeneralattitudestowardsartificialintelligencescale
_version_ 1718405584477224960