Throughfall and stemflow nutrient flux in deodar and oak forests, Garhwal Himalaya, India

A study to understand the throughfall and stemflow chemistry under deodar and oak forests of Garhwal Himalaya was conducted during 2014–2015. Total rainfall during experimental period was 1473.8 mm and estimated interception loss was 34.018% for deodar forest, 24.85% for oak forest. Stemflow represe...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Purna Jana, Sabyasachi Dasgupta, Nagendra P. Todaria
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: IWA Publishing 2021
Materias:
oak
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1156382348104d90ab10aa2c1749e6e2
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1156382348104d90ab10aa2c1749e6e2
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1156382348104d90ab10aa2c1749e6e22021-11-06T07:15:23ZThroughfall and stemflow nutrient flux in deodar and oak forests, Garhwal Himalaya, India1606-97491607-079810.2166/ws.2021.009https://doaj.org/article/1156382348104d90ab10aa2c1749e6e22021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttp://ws.iwaponline.com/content/21/4/1649https://doaj.org/toc/1606-9749https://doaj.org/toc/1607-0798A study to understand the throughfall and stemflow chemistry under deodar and oak forests of Garhwal Himalaya was conducted during 2014–2015. Total rainfall during experimental period was 1473.8 mm and estimated interception loss was 34.018% for deodar forest, 24.85% for oak forest. Stemflow represented the minimum proportion of gross rainfall, i.e. 0.321% in deodar forest and 0.463% in oak forest. pH of throughfall and stemflow in both deodar (6.087 and 6.47 respectively) and oak forests (6.75 and 7.03 respectively) was significantly more acidic than the gross rainfall (7.15). Electrical conductivity was recorded higher in deodar stemflow (231.89 μs/cm) and throughfall (102.75 μs/cm) compared to oak forest (172.92 μs/cm and 83.83 μs/cm respectively). Net nutrient leaching and stemflow were considerably higher from oak forest than deodar forest. Oak forest has better water yield capacity than deodar forest as the interception loss was higher in deodar forest. The idea of sustainable agriculture may be possible surrounding such forests as the need for chemical fertilizer and water can be met by the nutrient-rich soil, available soil moisture and surface water. HIGHLIGHTS Oak forest has better water yielding and nutrient deposition capacity than deodar forest.; Climate and its changing condition have influence on rainfall partitioning.; Precipitation input plays significant role in nutrient cycling.; Sustainable agriculture may be possible around such forests as the need for chemical fertilizer and water can be met by nutrient-rich soil, available soil moisture and surface water.;Purna JanaSabyasachi DasguptaNagendra P. TodariaIWA Publishingarticledeodarecosystem servicehydrological fluxnutrient depositionoakWater supply for domestic and industrial purposesTD201-500River, lake, and water-supply engineering (General)TC401-506ENWater Supply, Vol 21, Iss 4, Pp 1649-1656 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic deodar
ecosystem service
hydrological flux
nutrient deposition
oak
Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes
TD201-500
River, lake, and water-supply engineering (General)
TC401-506
spellingShingle deodar
ecosystem service
hydrological flux
nutrient deposition
oak
Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes
TD201-500
River, lake, and water-supply engineering (General)
TC401-506
Purna Jana
Sabyasachi Dasgupta
Nagendra P. Todaria
Throughfall and stemflow nutrient flux in deodar and oak forests, Garhwal Himalaya, India
description A study to understand the throughfall and stemflow chemistry under deodar and oak forests of Garhwal Himalaya was conducted during 2014–2015. Total rainfall during experimental period was 1473.8 mm and estimated interception loss was 34.018% for deodar forest, 24.85% for oak forest. Stemflow represented the minimum proportion of gross rainfall, i.e. 0.321% in deodar forest and 0.463% in oak forest. pH of throughfall and stemflow in both deodar (6.087 and 6.47 respectively) and oak forests (6.75 and 7.03 respectively) was significantly more acidic than the gross rainfall (7.15). Electrical conductivity was recorded higher in deodar stemflow (231.89 μs/cm) and throughfall (102.75 μs/cm) compared to oak forest (172.92 μs/cm and 83.83 μs/cm respectively). Net nutrient leaching and stemflow were considerably higher from oak forest than deodar forest. Oak forest has better water yield capacity than deodar forest as the interception loss was higher in deodar forest. The idea of sustainable agriculture may be possible surrounding such forests as the need for chemical fertilizer and water can be met by the nutrient-rich soil, available soil moisture and surface water. HIGHLIGHTS Oak forest has better water yielding and nutrient deposition capacity than deodar forest.; Climate and its changing condition have influence on rainfall partitioning.; Precipitation input plays significant role in nutrient cycling.; Sustainable agriculture may be possible around such forests as the need for chemical fertilizer and water can be met by nutrient-rich soil, available soil moisture and surface water.;
format article
author Purna Jana
Sabyasachi Dasgupta
Nagendra P. Todaria
author_facet Purna Jana
Sabyasachi Dasgupta
Nagendra P. Todaria
author_sort Purna Jana
title Throughfall and stemflow nutrient flux in deodar and oak forests, Garhwal Himalaya, India
title_short Throughfall and stemflow nutrient flux in deodar and oak forests, Garhwal Himalaya, India
title_full Throughfall and stemflow nutrient flux in deodar and oak forests, Garhwal Himalaya, India
title_fullStr Throughfall and stemflow nutrient flux in deodar and oak forests, Garhwal Himalaya, India
title_full_unstemmed Throughfall and stemflow nutrient flux in deodar and oak forests, Garhwal Himalaya, India
title_sort throughfall and stemflow nutrient flux in deodar and oak forests, garhwal himalaya, india
publisher IWA Publishing
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/1156382348104d90ab10aa2c1749e6e2
work_keys_str_mv AT purnajana throughfallandstemflownutrientfluxindeodarandoakforestsgarhwalhimalayaindia
AT sabyasachidasgupta throughfallandstemflownutrientfluxindeodarandoakforestsgarhwalhimalayaindia
AT nagendraptodaria throughfallandstemflownutrientfluxindeodarandoakforestsgarhwalhimalayaindia
_version_ 1718443776788135936