Recent Progress in <i>Shigella</i> and <i>Burkholderia pseudomallei</i> Vaccines

Significant advancement has been made in the development of vaccines against bacterial pathogens. However, several roadblocks have been found during the evaluation of vaccines against intracellular bacterial pathogens. Therefore, new lessons could be learned from different vaccines developed against...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Itziar Chapartegui-González, Sarah Bowser, Alfredo G. Torres, Nittaya Khakhum
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/11685321104c405f8de3afbf71951f48
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:11685321104c405f8de3afbf71951f48
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:11685321104c405f8de3afbf71951f482021-11-25T18:37:31ZRecent Progress in <i>Shigella</i> and <i>Burkholderia pseudomallei</i> Vaccines10.3390/pathogens101113532076-0817https://doaj.org/article/11685321104c405f8de3afbf71951f482021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/10/11/1353https://doaj.org/toc/2076-0817Significant advancement has been made in the development of vaccines against bacterial pathogens. However, several roadblocks have been found during the evaluation of vaccines against intracellular bacterial pathogens. Therefore, new lessons could be learned from different vaccines developed against unrelated intracellular pathogens. Bacillary dysentery and melioidosis are important causes of morbidity and mortality in developing nations, which are caused by the intracellular bacteria <i>Shigella</i> and <i>Burkholderia pseudomallei</i>, respectively. Although the mechanisms of bacterial infection, dissemination, and route of infection do not provide clues about the commonalities of the pathogenic infectious processes of these bacteria, a wide variety of vaccine platforms recently evaluated suggest that in addition to the stimulation of antibodies, identifying protective antigens and inducing T cell responses are some additional required elements to induce effective protection. In this review, we perform a comparative evaluation of recent candidate vaccines used to combat these two infectious agents, emphasizing the common strategies that can help investigators advance effective and protective vaccines to clinical trials.Itziar Chapartegui-GonzálezSarah BowserAlfredo G. TorresNittaya KhakhumMDPI AGarticle<i>Burkholderia pseudomallei</i><i>Shigella</i>vaccineslive attenuatedglycoconjugate vaccinessubunit vaccinesMedicineRENPathogens, Vol 10, Iss 1353, p 1353 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic <i>Burkholderia pseudomallei</i>
<i>Shigella</i>
vaccines
live attenuated
glycoconjugate vaccines
subunit vaccines
Medicine
R
spellingShingle <i>Burkholderia pseudomallei</i>
<i>Shigella</i>
vaccines
live attenuated
glycoconjugate vaccines
subunit vaccines
Medicine
R
Itziar Chapartegui-González
Sarah Bowser
Alfredo G. Torres
Nittaya Khakhum
Recent Progress in <i>Shigella</i> and <i>Burkholderia pseudomallei</i> Vaccines
description Significant advancement has been made in the development of vaccines against bacterial pathogens. However, several roadblocks have been found during the evaluation of vaccines against intracellular bacterial pathogens. Therefore, new lessons could be learned from different vaccines developed against unrelated intracellular pathogens. Bacillary dysentery and melioidosis are important causes of morbidity and mortality in developing nations, which are caused by the intracellular bacteria <i>Shigella</i> and <i>Burkholderia pseudomallei</i>, respectively. Although the mechanisms of bacterial infection, dissemination, and route of infection do not provide clues about the commonalities of the pathogenic infectious processes of these bacteria, a wide variety of vaccine platforms recently evaluated suggest that in addition to the stimulation of antibodies, identifying protective antigens and inducing T cell responses are some additional required elements to induce effective protection. In this review, we perform a comparative evaluation of recent candidate vaccines used to combat these two infectious agents, emphasizing the common strategies that can help investigators advance effective and protective vaccines to clinical trials.
format article
author Itziar Chapartegui-González
Sarah Bowser
Alfredo G. Torres
Nittaya Khakhum
author_facet Itziar Chapartegui-González
Sarah Bowser
Alfredo G. Torres
Nittaya Khakhum
author_sort Itziar Chapartegui-González
title Recent Progress in <i>Shigella</i> and <i>Burkholderia pseudomallei</i> Vaccines
title_short Recent Progress in <i>Shigella</i> and <i>Burkholderia pseudomallei</i> Vaccines
title_full Recent Progress in <i>Shigella</i> and <i>Burkholderia pseudomallei</i> Vaccines
title_fullStr Recent Progress in <i>Shigella</i> and <i>Burkholderia pseudomallei</i> Vaccines
title_full_unstemmed Recent Progress in <i>Shigella</i> and <i>Burkholderia pseudomallei</i> Vaccines
title_sort recent progress in <i>shigella</i> and <i>burkholderia pseudomallei</i> vaccines
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/11685321104c405f8de3afbf71951f48
work_keys_str_mv AT itziarchaparteguigonzalez recentprogressinishigellaiandiburkholderiapseudomalleiivaccines
AT sarahbowser recentprogressinishigellaiandiburkholderiapseudomalleiivaccines
AT alfredogtorres recentprogressinishigellaiandiburkholderiapseudomalleiivaccines
AT nittayakhakhum recentprogressinishigellaiandiburkholderiapseudomalleiivaccines
_version_ 1718410876611985408