Comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study

Abstract This study aimed to perform a comparative analysis of postoperative results between lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS) treated with oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) from the Chiba spine surgery registry database. Sixty-five p...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Hiromitsu Takaoka, Kazuhide Inage, Yawara Eguchi, Yasuhiro Shiga, Takeo Furuya, Satoshi Maki, Yasuchika Aoki, Masahiro Inoue, Takayuki Fujiyoshi, Takuya Miyamoto, Yuji Noguchi, Shinichiro Nakamura, Tomoaki Kinoshita, Takahito Kamada, Hiroshi Takahashi, Junya Saito, Masaki Norimoto, Toshiaki Kotani, Tsuyoshi Sakuma, Yasushi Iijima, Tetsuhiro Ishikawa, Tomotaka Umimura, Mitsutoshi Ohta, Miyako Suzuki-Narita, Keigo Enomoto, Takashi Sato, Masashi Sato, Masahiro Suzuki, Takashi Hozumi, Geundong Kim, Norichika Mizuki, Ryuto Tsuchiya, Takuma Otagiri, Tomohito Mukaihata, Takahisa Hishiya, Seiji Ohtori, Sumihisa Orita
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/1174d028a6a24ecc9b1850aea2845bb4
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:1174d028a6a24ecc9b1850aea2845bb4
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:1174d028a6a24ecc9b1850aea2845bb42021-12-02T16:45:53ZComparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study10.1038/s41598-021-95774-12045-2322https://doaj.org/article/1174d028a6a24ecc9b1850aea2845bb42021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95774-1https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract This study aimed to perform a comparative analysis of postoperative results between lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS) treated with oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) from the Chiba spine surgery registry database. Sixty-five patients who underwent single-level OLIF (O group) for LDS with ≥ 3 years’ follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. The control group comprised 78 patients who underwent single-level TLIF (T group). The analyzed variables included global alignment, radiological parameters of fused segments, asymptomatic and symptomatic ASD incidence, clinical outcomes at 3 years postoperatively using the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire data, visual analogue scale scores for low back pain, lower extremity pain, and lower extremity numbness. There was no significant change in global alignment between the two groups. The rate of improvement in anterior intervertebral disc height was not significantly different between the groups at 1-month postoperatively. However, at the final evaluation, the anterior intervertebral disc height and incidence of asymptomatic ASD were significantly higher in the O group. There was no significant difference in symptomatic ASD, reoperation cases, or clinical results between groups. Thus, single-level OLIF can maintain the corrected disc height, but as it has no effect on global alignment, its benefit is limited.Hiromitsu TakaokaKazuhide InageYawara EguchiYasuhiro ShigaTakeo FuruyaSatoshi MakiYasuchika AokiMasahiro InoueTakayuki FujiyoshiTakuya MiyamotoYuji NoguchiShinichiro NakamuraTomoaki KinoshitaTakahito KamadaHiroshi TakahashiJunya SaitoMasaki NorimotoToshiaki KotaniTsuyoshi SakumaYasushi IijimaTetsuhiro IshikawaTomotaka UmimuraMitsutoshi OhtaMiyako Suzuki-NaritaKeigo EnomotoTakashi SatoMasashi SatoMasahiro SuzukiTakashi HozumiGeundong KimNorichika MizukiRyuto TsuchiyaTakuma OtagiriTomohito MukaihataTakahisa HishiyaSeiji OhtoriSumihisa OritaNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Hiromitsu Takaoka Kazuhide Inage Yawara Eguchi Yasuhiro Shiga Takeo Furuya Satoshi Maki Yasuchika Aoki Masahiro Inoue Takayuki Fujiyoshi Takuya Miyamoto Yuji Noguchi Shinichiro Nakamura Tomoaki Kinoshita Takahito Kamada Hiroshi Takahashi Junya Saito Masaki Norimoto Toshiaki Kotani Tsuyoshi Sakuma Yasushi Iijima Tetsuhiro Ishikawa Tomotaka Umimura Mitsutoshi Ohta Miyako Suzuki-Narita Keigo Enomoto Takashi Sato Masashi Sato Masahiro Suzuki Takashi Hozumi Geundong Kim Norichika Mizuki Ryuto Tsuchiya Takuma Otagiri Tomohito Mukaihata Takahisa Hishiya Seiji Ohtori Sumihisa Orita Comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study
description	Abstract This study aimed to perform a comparative analysis of postoperative results between lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS) treated with oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) from the Chiba spine surgery registry database. Sixty-five patients who underwent single-level OLIF (O group) for LDS with ≥ 3 years’ follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. The control group comprised 78 patients who underwent single-level TLIF (T group). The analyzed variables included global alignment, radiological parameters of fused segments, asymptomatic and symptomatic ASD incidence, clinical outcomes at 3 years postoperatively using the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire data, visual analogue scale scores for low back pain, lower extremity pain, and lower extremity numbness. There was no significant change in global alignment between the two groups. The rate of improvement in anterior intervertebral disc height was not significantly different between the groups at 1-month postoperatively. However, at the final evaluation, the anterior intervertebral disc height and incidence of asymptomatic ASD were significantly higher in the O group. There was no significant difference in symptomatic ASD, reoperation cases, or clinical results between groups. Thus, single-level OLIF can maintain the corrected disc height, but as it has no effect on global alignment, its benefit is limited.
format	article
author	Hiromitsu Takaoka Kazuhide Inage Yawara Eguchi Yasuhiro Shiga Takeo Furuya Satoshi Maki Yasuchika Aoki Masahiro Inoue Takayuki Fujiyoshi Takuya Miyamoto Yuji Noguchi Shinichiro Nakamura Tomoaki Kinoshita Takahito Kamada Hiroshi Takahashi Junya Saito Masaki Norimoto Toshiaki Kotani Tsuyoshi Sakuma Yasushi Iijima Tetsuhiro Ishikawa Tomotaka Umimura Mitsutoshi Ohta Miyako Suzuki-Narita Keigo Enomoto Takashi Sato Masashi Sato Masahiro Suzuki Takashi Hozumi Geundong Kim Norichika Mizuki Ryuto Tsuchiya Takuma Otagiri Tomohito Mukaihata Takahisa Hishiya Seiji Ohtori Sumihisa Orita
author_facet	Hiromitsu Takaoka Kazuhide Inage Yawara Eguchi Yasuhiro Shiga Takeo Furuya Satoshi Maki Yasuchika Aoki Masahiro Inoue Takayuki Fujiyoshi Takuya Miyamoto Yuji Noguchi Shinichiro Nakamura Tomoaki Kinoshita Takahito Kamada Hiroshi Takahashi Junya Saito Masaki Norimoto Toshiaki Kotani Tsuyoshi Sakuma Yasushi Iijima Tetsuhiro Ishikawa Tomotaka Umimura Mitsutoshi Ohta Miyako Suzuki-Narita Keigo Enomoto Takashi Sato Masashi Sato Masahiro Suzuki Takashi Hozumi Geundong Kim Norichika Mizuki Ryuto Tsuchiya Takuma Otagiri Tomohito Mukaihata Takahisa Hishiya Seiji Ohtori Sumihisa Orita
author_sort	Hiromitsu Takaoka
title	Comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study
title_short	Comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study
title_full	Comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study
title_fullStr	Comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study
title_full_unstemmed	Comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study
title_sort	comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/1174d028a6a24ecc9b1850aea2845bb4
work_keys_str_mv	AT hiromitsutakaoka comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT kazuhideinage comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT yawaraeguchi comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT yasuhiroshiga comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT takeofuruya comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT satoshimaki comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT yasuchikaaoki comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT masahiroinoue comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT takayukifujiyoshi comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT takuyamiyamoto comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT yujinoguchi comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT shinichironakamura comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT tomoakikinoshita comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT takahitokamada comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT hiroshitakahashi comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT junyasaito comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT masakinorimoto comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT toshiakikotani comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT tsuyoshisakuma comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT yasushiiijima comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT tetsuhiroishikawa comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT tomotakaumimura comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT mitsutoshiohta comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT miyakosuzukinarita comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT keigoenomoto comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT takashisato comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT masashisato comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT masahirosuzuki comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT takashihozumi comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT geundongkim comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT norichikamizuki comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT ryutotsuchiya comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT takumaotagiri comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT tomohitomukaihata comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT takahisahishiya comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT seijiohtori comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy AT sumihisaorita comparisonbetweenintervertebralobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionamulticenterstudy
_version_	1718383438101217280

Comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study

Ejemplares similares