A case series of profilometric changes in two implant placement protocols at periodontally compromised non-molar sites

Abstract Information regarding profilometric changes at a soft tissue level following implant placement with different protocols is insufficient. Therefore, this study aimed to comparatively investigate the profilometric tissue changes with respect to late implant placement following alveolar ridge...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Kwantae Noh, Daniel S. Thoma, Jung-Chul Park, Dong-Woon Lee, Seung-Yun Shin, Hyun-Chang Lim
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/11868ab362004606b100a5ee2da54a07
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:11868ab362004606b100a5ee2da54a07
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:11868ab362004606b100a5ee2da54a072021-12-02T10:49:30ZA case series of profilometric changes in two implant placement protocols at periodontally compromised non-molar sites10.1038/s41598-021-81402-52045-2322https://doaj.org/article/11868ab362004606b100a5ee2da54a072021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81402-5https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Information regarding profilometric changes at a soft tissue level following implant placement with different protocols is insufficient. Therefore, this study aimed to comparatively investigate the profilometric tissue changes with respect to late implant placement following alveolar ridge preservation (LP/ARP) and early implantation (EP) in periodontally compromised non-molar extraction sites. Sixteen patients were randomly assigned to the following groups: implant placement 4 months post-ARP (group LP/ARP) and tooth extraction and implant placement 4–8 weeks post-extraction (group EP). Dental impressions were obtained immediately after final prosthesis insertion and at 3, 6, and 12 months. At the time of implant placement, bone augmentation was performed in the majority of the patients. Profilometric changes of the tissue contour were minimal between the final prosthesis insertion and 12 months in the mid-facial area (0.04–0.35 mm in group LP/ARP, 0.04–0.19 mm in group EP). The overall tissue volume increased in both groups (1.70 mm3 in group LP/ARP, 0.96 mm3 in group EP). In conclusion, LP/ARP and EP led to similar stability of the peri-implant tissue contour between the final prosthesis insertion and at 12 months. Moreover, the change of peri-implant tissue on the soft tissue level was minimal in both modalities.Kwantae NohDaniel S. ThomaJung-Chul ParkDong-Woon LeeSeung-Yun ShinHyun-Chang LimNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Kwantae Noh Daniel S. Thoma Jung-Chul Park Dong-Woon Lee Seung-Yun Shin Hyun-Chang Lim A case series of profilometric changes in two implant placement protocols at periodontally compromised non-molar sites
description	Abstract Information regarding profilometric changes at a soft tissue level following implant placement with different protocols is insufficient. Therefore, this study aimed to comparatively investigate the profilometric tissue changes with respect to late implant placement following alveolar ridge preservation (LP/ARP) and early implantation (EP) in periodontally compromised non-molar extraction sites. Sixteen patients were randomly assigned to the following groups: implant placement 4 months post-ARP (group LP/ARP) and tooth extraction and implant placement 4–8 weeks post-extraction (group EP). Dental impressions were obtained immediately after final prosthesis insertion and at 3, 6, and 12 months. At the time of implant placement, bone augmentation was performed in the majority of the patients. Profilometric changes of the tissue contour were minimal between the final prosthesis insertion and 12 months in the mid-facial area (0.04–0.35 mm in group LP/ARP, 0.04–0.19 mm in group EP). The overall tissue volume increased in both groups (1.70 mm3 in group LP/ARP, 0.96 mm3 in group EP). In conclusion, LP/ARP and EP led to similar stability of the peri-implant tissue contour between the final prosthesis insertion and at 12 months. Moreover, the change of peri-implant tissue on the soft tissue level was minimal in both modalities.
format	article
author	Kwantae Noh Daniel S. Thoma Jung-Chul Park Dong-Woon Lee Seung-Yun Shin Hyun-Chang Lim
author_facet	Kwantae Noh Daniel S. Thoma Jung-Chul Park Dong-Woon Lee Seung-Yun Shin Hyun-Chang Lim
author_sort	Kwantae Noh
title	A case series of profilometric changes in two implant placement protocols at periodontally compromised non-molar sites
title_short	A case series of profilometric changes in two implant placement protocols at periodontally compromised non-molar sites
title_full	A case series of profilometric changes in two implant placement protocols at periodontally compromised non-molar sites
title_fullStr	A case series of profilometric changes in two implant placement protocols at periodontally compromised non-molar sites
title_full_unstemmed	A case series of profilometric changes in two implant placement protocols at periodontally compromised non-molar sites
title_sort	case series of profilometric changes in two implant placement protocols at periodontally compromised non-molar sites
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/11868ab362004606b100a5ee2da54a07
work_keys_str_mv	AT kwantaenoh acaseseriesofprofilometricchangesintwoimplantplacementprotocolsatperiodontallycompromisednonmolarsites AT danielsthoma acaseseriesofprofilometricchangesintwoimplantplacementprotocolsatperiodontallycompromisednonmolarsites AT jungchulpark acaseseriesofprofilometricchangesintwoimplantplacementprotocolsatperiodontallycompromisednonmolarsites AT dongwoonlee acaseseriesofprofilometricchangesintwoimplantplacementprotocolsatperiodontallycompromisednonmolarsites AT seungyunshin acaseseriesofprofilometricchangesintwoimplantplacementprotocolsatperiodontallycompromisednonmolarsites AT hyunchanglim acaseseriesofprofilometricchangesintwoimplantplacementprotocolsatperiodontallycompromisednonmolarsites AT kwantaenoh caseseriesofprofilometricchangesintwoimplantplacementprotocolsatperiodontallycompromisednonmolarsites AT danielsthoma caseseriesofprofilometricchangesintwoimplantplacementprotocolsatperiodontallycompromisednonmolarsites AT jungchulpark caseseriesofprofilometricchangesintwoimplantplacementprotocolsatperiodontallycompromisednonmolarsites AT dongwoonlee caseseriesofprofilometricchangesintwoimplantplacementprotocolsatperiodontallycompromisednonmolarsites AT seungyunshin caseseriesofprofilometricchangesintwoimplantplacementprotocolsatperiodontallycompromisednonmolarsites AT hyunchanglim caseseriesofprofilometricchangesintwoimplantplacementprotocolsatperiodontallycompromisednonmolarsites
_version_	1718396572008448000

A case series of profilometric changes in two implant placement protocols at periodontally compromised non-molar sites

Ejemplares similares