The Kemalists
The range of titles in Prometheus Books’ “Islamic Studies” section is quite intriguing. According to its webpage, this “leading publisher in philosophy, popular science, and critical thinking” appears to be dedicated to covering Islamic-related topics of interest in a comprehensive manner for a pos...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
International Institute of Islamic Thought
2006
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/1188d03671b54a6ba99f8181978d2af6 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | The range of titles in Prometheus Books’ “Islamic Studies” section is quite
intriguing. According to its webpage, this “leading publisher in philosophy,
popular science, and critical thinking” appears to be dedicated to covering
Islamic-related topics of interest in a comprehensive manner for a post-9/11
western audience. Recnet publications include The Legacy of Jihad: Islamic
Holy War and the Fate of Non-Muslims (the author is a professor of medicine),
The Myth of Islamic Tolerance (authored by the “director of Jihad
Watch”), and Leaving Islam: Apostates Speak Out and Why I Am not a
Muslim (both by the notorious Ibn Warraq).
The book under review fits into this series due to its apologetic character
and narrow perspective on Islam – a perspective that sees political enunciations
motivated by Islam as threatening and in direct contradiction to the
(presumably universal) modern. The front book flap sets the tone and caters
to a broad readership: “A clash of civilizations – between the secular traditions
of the West and the fundamentalist Islamic revival in the East – has
plunged the world into serious crisis.”
First of all, it has to be stated that The Kemalists is neither an academic
book nor an “Islamic Studies” book. It is filled with methodological problems
and utterly incorrect statements about Islam. One particularly blatant example
should suffice to make this point: On page 198, Kaylan lumps together as
brotherhoods the “reactionary” Muslim Brotherhood, the “Shafis” (sic), the
“Maliki Brotherhood,” and the “liberal … Melami and Bektashi brotherhoods”
– apparently not understanding the differences between a modern
Islamist movement, schools of law, and Sufi orders. To be fair, the author does
not claim to be an Islamicist; however, it is disturbing to see how politically
motivated treatises such as his gain publicity under an “Islamic Studies” label ...
|
|---|