Differences and similarities in the conceptualization of COVID-19 and other diseases in the first Italian lockdown

Abstract Several studies have highlighted the flexible character of our conceptual system. However, less is known about the construction of meaning and the impact of novel concepts on the structuring of our conceptual space. We addressed these questions by collecting free listing data from Italian p...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Claudia Mazzuca, Ilenia Falcinelli, Arthur-Henri Michalland, Luca Tummolini, Anna M. Borghi
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1191345a889542cb87578f327ec86e3f
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1191345a889542cb87578f327ec86e3f
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1191345a889542cb87578f327ec86e3f2021-12-02T18:33:47ZDifferences and similarities in the conceptualization of COVID-19 and other diseases in the first Italian lockdown10.1038/s41598-021-97805-32045-2322https://doaj.org/article/1191345a889542cb87578f327ec86e3f2021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97805-3https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Several studies have highlighted the flexible character of our conceptual system. However, less is known about the construction of meaning and the impact of novel concepts on the structuring of our conceptual space. We addressed these questions by collecting free listing data from Italian participants on a newly–and yet nowadays critical–introduced concept, i.e., COVID-19, during the first Italian lockdown. We also collected data for other five illness-related concepts. Our results show that COVID-19’s representation is mostly couched in the emotional sphere, predominantly evoking fear—linked to both possible health-related concerns and social-emotional ones. In contrast with initial public debates we found that participants did not assimilate COVID-19 neither completely to severe illnesses (e.g., tumor) nor completely to mild illnesses (e.g., flu). Moreover, we also found that COVID-19 has shaped conceptual relations of other concepts in the illness domain, making certain features and associations more salient (e.g., flu-fear; disease-mask). Overall, our results show for the first time how a novel, real concept molds existing conceptual relations, testifying the malleability of our conceptual system.Claudia MazzucaIlenia FalcinelliArthur-Henri MichallandLuca TummoliniAnna M. BorghiNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Claudia Mazzuca
Ilenia Falcinelli
Arthur-Henri Michalland
Luca Tummolini
Anna M. Borghi
Differences and similarities in the conceptualization of COVID-19 and other diseases in the first Italian lockdown
description Abstract Several studies have highlighted the flexible character of our conceptual system. However, less is known about the construction of meaning and the impact of novel concepts on the structuring of our conceptual space. We addressed these questions by collecting free listing data from Italian participants on a newly–and yet nowadays critical–introduced concept, i.e., COVID-19, during the first Italian lockdown. We also collected data for other five illness-related concepts. Our results show that COVID-19’s representation is mostly couched in the emotional sphere, predominantly evoking fear—linked to both possible health-related concerns and social-emotional ones. In contrast with initial public debates we found that participants did not assimilate COVID-19 neither completely to severe illnesses (e.g., tumor) nor completely to mild illnesses (e.g., flu). Moreover, we also found that COVID-19 has shaped conceptual relations of other concepts in the illness domain, making certain features and associations more salient (e.g., flu-fear; disease-mask). Overall, our results show for the first time how a novel, real concept molds existing conceptual relations, testifying the malleability of our conceptual system.
format article
author Claudia Mazzuca
Ilenia Falcinelli
Arthur-Henri Michalland
Luca Tummolini
Anna M. Borghi
author_facet Claudia Mazzuca
Ilenia Falcinelli
Arthur-Henri Michalland
Luca Tummolini
Anna M. Borghi
author_sort Claudia Mazzuca
title Differences and similarities in the conceptualization of COVID-19 and other diseases in the first Italian lockdown
title_short Differences and similarities in the conceptualization of COVID-19 and other diseases in the first Italian lockdown
title_full Differences and similarities in the conceptualization of COVID-19 and other diseases in the first Italian lockdown
title_fullStr Differences and similarities in the conceptualization of COVID-19 and other diseases in the first Italian lockdown
title_full_unstemmed Differences and similarities in the conceptualization of COVID-19 and other diseases in the first Italian lockdown
title_sort differences and similarities in the conceptualization of covid-19 and other diseases in the first italian lockdown
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/1191345a889542cb87578f327ec86e3f
work_keys_str_mv AT claudiamazzuca differencesandsimilaritiesintheconceptualizationofcovid19andotherdiseasesinthefirstitalianlockdown
AT ileniafalcinelli differencesandsimilaritiesintheconceptualizationofcovid19andotherdiseasesinthefirstitalianlockdown
AT arthurhenrimichalland differencesandsimilaritiesintheconceptualizationofcovid19andotherdiseasesinthefirstitalianlockdown
AT lucatummolini differencesandsimilaritiesintheconceptualizationofcovid19andotherdiseasesinthefirstitalianlockdown
AT annamborghi differencesandsimilaritiesintheconceptualizationofcovid19andotherdiseasesinthefirstitalianlockdown
_version_ 1718377903539879936