A predictive model for pain response following radiotherapy for treatment of spinal metastases

Abstract To establish a predictive model for pain response following radiotherapy using a combination of radiomic and clinical features of spinal metastasis. This retrospective study enrolled patients with painful spine metastases who received palliative radiation therapy from 2018 to 2019. Pain res...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kohei Wakabayashi, Yutaro Koide, Takahiro Aoyama, Hidetoshi Shimizu, Risei Miyauchi, Hiroshi Tanaka, Hiroyuki Tachibana, Katsumasa Nakamura, Takeshi Kodaira
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/11afa5c093ef4e91b4f2052931e47a43
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:11afa5c093ef4e91b4f2052931e47a43
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:11afa5c093ef4e91b4f2052931e47a432021-12-02T17:23:26ZA predictive model for pain response following radiotherapy for treatment of spinal metastases10.1038/s41598-021-92363-02045-2322https://doaj.org/article/11afa5c093ef4e91b4f2052931e47a432021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92363-0https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract To establish a predictive model for pain response following radiotherapy using a combination of radiomic and clinical features of spinal metastasis. This retrospective study enrolled patients with painful spine metastases who received palliative radiation therapy from 2018 to 2019. Pain response was defined using the International Consensus Criteria. The clinical and radiomic features were extracted from medical records and pre-treatment CT images. Feature selection was performed and a random forests ensemble learning method was used to build a predictive model. Area under the curve (AUC) was used as a predictive performance metric. 69 patients were enrolled with 48 patients showing a response. Random forest models built on the radiomic, clinical, and ‘combined’ features achieved an AUC of 0.824, 0.702, 0.848, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the combined features model were 85.4% and 76.2%, at the best diagnostic decision point. We built a pain response model in patients with spinal metastases using a combination of clinical and radiomic features. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to examine pain response using pre-treatment CT radiomic features. Our model showed the potential to predict patients who respond to radiation therapy.Kohei WakabayashiYutaro KoideTakahiro AoyamaHidetoshi ShimizuRisei MiyauchiHiroshi TanakaHiroyuki TachibanaKatsumasa NakamuraTakeshi KodairaNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Kohei Wakabayashi
Yutaro Koide
Takahiro Aoyama
Hidetoshi Shimizu
Risei Miyauchi
Hiroshi Tanaka
Hiroyuki Tachibana
Katsumasa Nakamura
Takeshi Kodaira
A predictive model for pain response following radiotherapy for treatment of spinal metastases
description Abstract To establish a predictive model for pain response following radiotherapy using a combination of radiomic and clinical features of spinal metastasis. This retrospective study enrolled patients with painful spine metastases who received palliative radiation therapy from 2018 to 2019. Pain response was defined using the International Consensus Criteria. The clinical and radiomic features were extracted from medical records and pre-treatment CT images. Feature selection was performed and a random forests ensemble learning method was used to build a predictive model. Area under the curve (AUC) was used as a predictive performance metric. 69 patients were enrolled with 48 patients showing a response. Random forest models built on the radiomic, clinical, and ‘combined’ features achieved an AUC of 0.824, 0.702, 0.848, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the combined features model were 85.4% and 76.2%, at the best diagnostic decision point. We built a pain response model in patients with spinal metastases using a combination of clinical and radiomic features. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to examine pain response using pre-treatment CT radiomic features. Our model showed the potential to predict patients who respond to radiation therapy.
format article
author Kohei Wakabayashi
Yutaro Koide
Takahiro Aoyama
Hidetoshi Shimizu
Risei Miyauchi
Hiroshi Tanaka
Hiroyuki Tachibana
Katsumasa Nakamura
Takeshi Kodaira
author_facet Kohei Wakabayashi
Yutaro Koide
Takahiro Aoyama
Hidetoshi Shimizu
Risei Miyauchi
Hiroshi Tanaka
Hiroyuki Tachibana
Katsumasa Nakamura
Takeshi Kodaira
author_sort Kohei Wakabayashi
title A predictive model for pain response following radiotherapy for treatment of spinal metastases
title_short A predictive model for pain response following radiotherapy for treatment of spinal metastases
title_full A predictive model for pain response following radiotherapy for treatment of spinal metastases
title_fullStr A predictive model for pain response following radiotherapy for treatment of spinal metastases
title_full_unstemmed A predictive model for pain response following radiotherapy for treatment of spinal metastases
title_sort predictive model for pain response following radiotherapy for treatment of spinal metastases
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/11afa5c093ef4e91b4f2052931e47a43
work_keys_str_mv AT koheiwakabayashi apredictivemodelforpainresponsefollowingradiotherapyfortreatmentofspinalmetastases
AT yutarokoide apredictivemodelforpainresponsefollowingradiotherapyfortreatmentofspinalmetastases
AT takahiroaoyama apredictivemodelforpainresponsefollowingradiotherapyfortreatmentofspinalmetastases
AT hidetoshishimizu apredictivemodelforpainresponsefollowingradiotherapyfortreatmentofspinalmetastases
AT riseimiyauchi apredictivemodelforpainresponsefollowingradiotherapyfortreatmentofspinalmetastases
AT hiroshitanaka apredictivemodelforpainresponsefollowingradiotherapyfortreatmentofspinalmetastases
AT hiroyukitachibana apredictivemodelforpainresponsefollowingradiotherapyfortreatmentofspinalmetastases
AT katsumasanakamura apredictivemodelforpainresponsefollowingradiotherapyfortreatmentofspinalmetastases
AT takeshikodaira apredictivemodelforpainresponsefollowingradiotherapyfortreatmentofspinalmetastases
AT koheiwakabayashi predictivemodelforpainresponsefollowingradiotherapyfortreatmentofspinalmetastases
AT yutarokoide predictivemodelforpainresponsefollowingradiotherapyfortreatmentofspinalmetastases
AT takahiroaoyama predictivemodelforpainresponsefollowingradiotherapyfortreatmentofspinalmetastases
AT hidetoshishimizu predictivemodelforpainresponsefollowingradiotherapyfortreatmentofspinalmetastases
AT riseimiyauchi predictivemodelforpainresponsefollowingradiotherapyfortreatmentofspinalmetastases
AT hiroshitanaka predictivemodelforpainresponsefollowingradiotherapyfortreatmentofspinalmetastases
AT hiroyukitachibana predictivemodelforpainresponsefollowingradiotherapyfortreatmentofspinalmetastases
AT katsumasanakamura predictivemodelforpainresponsefollowingradiotherapyfortreatmentofspinalmetastases
AT takeshikodaira predictivemodelforpainresponsefollowingradiotherapyfortreatmentofspinalmetastases
_version_ 1718380952173936640