When is hub gene selection better than standard meta-analysis?
Since hub nodes have been found to play important roles in many networks, highly connected hub genes are expected to play an important role in biology as well. However, the empirical evidence remains ambiguous. An open question is whether (or when) hub gene selection leads to more meaningful gene li...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Peter Langfelder, Paul S Mischel, Steve Horvath |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/11dca275fb6f4220844cfa24aae66a02 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Nanoparticles for Magnetic Heating: When Two (or More) Is Better Than One
por: Jesus G. Ovejero, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
When Two are Better Than One: Synthesizing Heavily Unbalanced Data
por: Francisco Ferreira, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Antiviral Combination Clinically Better Than Standard Therapy in Severe but Not in Non-Severe COVID-19
por: Panda PK, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Selecting Hub Genes and Predicting Target Genes of microRNAs in Tuberculosis via the Bioinformatics Analysis
por: Siqi Deng, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
The Garbage Enzyme with Chinese Hoenylocust Fruits Showed Better Properties and Application than When Using the Garbage Enzyme Alone
por: Sitong Gu, et al.
Publicado: (2021)