Challenges to detect glaucomatous visual field loss with pupil perimetry [Corrigendum]

Asakawa K and Shoji N. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:1621–1625.On page 1622, 3rd paragraph from the left hand column, the sentence “Based on our previous study,8 in the 36 test points, the sensitivity of the seventh highest point when compared with the norma...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Asakawa K, Shoji N
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Dove Medical Press 2019
Materias:	Ophthalmology RE1-994
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/11ec3c7f36904c1b9c5a47b671314cd3
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:11ec3c7f36904c1b9c5a47b671314cd3
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:11ec3c7f36904c1b9c5a47b671314cd32021-12-02T11:26:46ZChallenges to detect glaucomatous visual field loss with pupil perimetry [Corrigendum]1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/11ec3c7f36904c1b9c5a47b671314cd32019-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/corrigendumchallenges-to-detect-glaucomatous-visual--field-loss-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Asakawa K and Shoji N. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:1621–1625.On page 1622, 3rd paragraph from the left hand column, the sentence “Based on our previous study,8 in the 36 test points, the sensitivity of the seventh highest point when compared with the normal value was used as the standard degree of sensitivity for the entire visual field. The pattern deviation (85th percentile) of the pupil field was calculated as a value representing the difference between age-matched normal and abnormal percentage pupil constriction.” should read “Based on our previous study,8 in the 36 test points, the sensitivity of the fifth highest point when compared with the normal value was used as the standard degree of sensitivity for the entire visual field. The pattern deviation (85th percentile) of the pupil field was calculated as a value representing the difference between age-matched normal and abnormal percentage pupil constriction.”  Following a review of our data post-publication, we found the incorrect calculation for the 36 test points with the 85th percentile value of pupil perimetry which should read fifth highest point instead.In the 36 points, the 85th percentile value of pupil perimetry was calculated as follows:36×0.85=30.636−30.6=5.4The authors apologize for this error.   Read the original article Asakawa KShoji NDove Medical PressarticleOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 13, Pp 1749-1750 (2019)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Ophthalmology RE1-994
spellingShingle	Ophthalmology RE1-994 Asakawa K Shoji N Challenges to detect glaucomatous visual field loss with pupil perimetry [Corrigendum]
description	Asakawa K and Shoji N. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:1621–1625.On page 1622, 3rd paragraph from the left hand column, the sentence “Based on our previous study,8 in the 36 test points, the sensitivity of the seventh highest point when compared with the normal value was used as the standard degree of sensitivity for the entire visual field. The pattern deviation (85th percentile) of the pupil field was calculated as a value representing the difference between age-matched normal and abnormal percentage pupil constriction.” should read “Based on our previous study,8 in the 36 test points, the sensitivity of the fifth highest point when compared with the normal value was used as the standard degree of sensitivity for the entire visual field. The pattern deviation (85th percentile) of the pupil field was calculated as a value representing the difference between age-matched normal and abnormal percentage pupil constriction.”  Following a review of our data post-publication, we found the incorrect calculation for the 36 test points with the 85th percentile value of pupil perimetry which should read fifth highest point instead.In the 36 points, the 85th percentile value of pupil perimetry was calculated as follows:36×0.85=30.636−30.6=5.4The authors apologize for this error.   Read the original article
format	article
author	Asakawa K Shoji N
author_facet	Asakawa K Shoji N
author_sort	Asakawa K
title	Challenges to detect glaucomatous visual field loss with pupil perimetry [Corrigendum]
title_short	Challenges to detect glaucomatous visual field loss with pupil perimetry [Corrigendum]
title_full	Challenges to detect glaucomatous visual field loss with pupil perimetry [Corrigendum]
title_fullStr	Challenges to detect glaucomatous visual field loss with pupil perimetry [Corrigendum]
title_full_unstemmed	Challenges to detect glaucomatous visual field loss with pupil perimetry [Corrigendum]
title_sort	challenges to detect glaucomatous visual field loss with pupil perimetry [corrigendum]
publisher	Dove Medical Press
publishDate	2019
url	https://doaj.org/article/11ec3c7f36904c1b9c5a47b671314cd3
work_keys_str_mv	AT asakawak challengestodetectglaucomatousvisualfieldlosswithpupilperimetrycorrigendum AT shojin challengestodetectglaucomatousvisualfieldlosswithpupilperimetrycorrigendum
_version_	1718395922910543872

Challenges to detect glaucomatous visual field loss with pupil perimetry [Corrigendum]

Ejemplares similares