Recanalisation theraphy for acute ischemic stroke in cancer patients
Abstract To date, very few studies focused their attention on efficacy and safety of recanalisation therapy in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with cancer, reporting conflicting results. We retrospectively analysed data from our database of consecutive patients admitted to the Udine University...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/11f07af28bb448968101021bad8c3d71 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:11f07af28bb448968101021bad8c3d71 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:11f07af28bb448968101021bad8c3d712021-12-02T17:51:06ZRecanalisation theraphy for acute ischemic stroke in cancer patients10.1038/s41598-021-91257-52045-2322https://doaj.org/article/11f07af28bb448968101021bad8c3d712021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91257-5https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract To date, very few studies focused their attention on efficacy and safety of recanalisation therapy in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with cancer, reporting conflicting results. We retrospectively analysed data from our database of consecutive patients admitted to the Udine University Hospital with AIS that were treated with recanalisation therapy, i.e. intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), mechanical thrombectomy (MT), and bridging therapy, from January 2015 to December 2019. We compared 3-month dependency, 3-month mortality, and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (SICH) occurrence of patients with active cancer (AC) and remote cancer (RC) with that of patients without cancer (WC) undergoing recanalisation therapy for AIS. Patients were followed up for 3 months. Among the 613 AIS patients included in the study, 79 patients (12.9%) had either AC (n = 46; 7.5%) or RC (n = 33; 5.4%). Although AC patients, when treated with IVT, had a significantly increased risk of 3-month mortality [odds ratio (OR) 6.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.42–20.07, p = 0.001] than WC patients, stroke-related deaths did not differ between AC and WC patients (30% vs. 28.8%, p = 0.939). There were no significant differences between AC and WC patients, when treated with MT ± IVT, regarding 3-month dependency, 3-month mortality and SICH. Functional independence, mortality, and SICH were similar between RC and WC patients. In conclusion, recanalisation therapy might be used in AIS patients with nonmetastatic AC and with RC. Further studies are needed to explore the outcome of AIS patients with metastatic cancer undergoing recanalisation therapy.Giovanni MerlinoCarmelo SmeraldaGian Luigi GigliSimone LorenzutSara PezAndrea SurcinelliAlessandro MariniValentina ManiaciMariarosaria ValenteNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Giovanni Merlino Carmelo Smeralda Gian Luigi Gigli Simone Lorenzut Sara Pez Andrea Surcinelli Alessandro Marini Valentina Maniaci Mariarosaria Valente Recanalisation theraphy for acute ischemic stroke in cancer patients |
description |
Abstract To date, very few studies focused their attention on efficacy and safety of recanalisation therapy in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with cancer, reporting conflicting results. We retrospectively analysed data from our database of consecutive patients admitted to the Udine University Hospital with AIS that were treated with recanalisation therapy, i.e. intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), mechanical thrombectomy (MT), and bridging therapy, from January 2015 to December 2019. We compared 3-month dependency, 3-month mortality, and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (SICH) occurrence of patients with active cancer (AC) and remote cancer (RC) with that of patients without cancer (WC) undergoing recanalisation therapy for AIS. Patients were followed up for 3 months. Among the 613 AIS patients included in the study, 79 patients (12.9%) had either AC (n = 46; 7.5%) or RC (n = 33; 5.4%). Although AC patients, when treated with IVT, had a significantly increased risk of 3-month mortality [odds ratio (OR) 6.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.42–20.07, p = 0.001] than WC patients, stroke-related deaths did not differ between AC and WC patients (30% vs. 28.8%, p = 0.939). There were no significant differences between AC and WC patients, when treated with MT ± IVT, regarding 3-month dependency, 3-month mortality and SICH. Functional independence, mortality, and SICH were similar between RC and WC patients. In conclusion, recanalisation therapy might be used in AIS patients with nonmetastatic AC and with RC. Further studies are needed to explore the outcome of AIS patients with metastatic cancer undergoing recanalisation therapy. |
format |
article |
author |
Giovanni Merlino Carmelo Smeralda Gian Luigi Gigli Simone Lorenzut Sara Pez Andrea Surcinelli Alessandro Marini Valentina Maniaci Mariarosaria Valente |
author_facet |
Giovanni Merlino Carmelo Smeralda Gian Luigi Gigli Simone Lorenzut Sara Pez Andrea Surcinelli Alessandro Marini Valentina Maniaci Mariarosaria Valente |
author_sort |
Giovanni Merlino |
title |
Recanalisation theraphy for acute ischemic stroke in cancer patients |
title_short |
Recanalisation theraphy for acute ischemic stroke in cancer patients |
title_full |
Recanalisation theraphy for acute ischemic stroke in cancer patients |
title_fullStr |
Recanalisation theraphy for acute ischemic stroke in cancer patients |
title_full_unstemmed |
Recanalisation theraphy for acute ischemic stroke in cancer patients |
title_sort |
recanalisation theraphy for acute ischemic stroke in cancer patients |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/11f07af28bb448968101021bad8c3d71 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT giovannimerlino recanalisationtheraphyforacuteischemicstrokeincancerpatients AT carmelosmeralda recanalisationtheraphyforacuteischemicstrokeincancerpatients AT gianluigigigli recanalisationtheraphyforacuteischemicstrokeincancerpatients AT simonelorenzut recanalisationtheraphyforacuteischemicstrokeincancerpatients AT sarapez recanalisationtheraphyforacuteischemicstrokeincancerpatients AT andreasurcinelli recanalisationtheraphyforacuteischemicstrokeincancerpatients AT alessandromarini recanalisationtheraphyforacuteischemicstrokeincancerpatients AT valentinamaniaci recanalisationtheraphyforacuteischemicstrokeincancerpatients AT mariarosariavalente recanalisationtheraphyforacuteischemicstrokeincancerpatients |
_version_ |
1718379270310461440 |