Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for computer-assisted reporting based on fully automated cross-lingual RadLex mappings

Abstract Computer-assisted reporting (CAR) tools were suggested to improve radiology report quality by context-sensitively recommending key imaging biomarkers. However, studies evaluating machine learning (ML) algorithms on cross-lingual ontological (RadLex) mappings for developing embedded CAR algo...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Máté E. Maros, Chang Gyu Cho, Andreas G. Junge, Benedikt Kämpgen, Victor Saase, Fabian Siegel, Frederik Trinkmann, Thomas Ganslandt, Christoph Groden, Holger Wenz
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/12348a5318d740d1a6395bfc7358ede7
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:12348a5318d740d1a6395bfc7358ede7
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:12348a5318d740d1a6395bfc7358ede72021-12-02T15:53:46ZComparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for computer-assisted reporting based on fully automated cross-lingual RadLex mappings10.1038/s41598-021-85016-92045-2322https://doaj.org/article/12348a5318d740d1a6395bfc7358ede72021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85016-9https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Computer-assisted reporting (CAR) tools were suggested to improve radiology report quality by context-sensitively recommending key imaging biomarkers. However, studies evaluating machine learning (ML) algorithms on cross-lingual ontological (RadLex) mappings for developing embedded CAR algorithms are lacking. Therefore, we compared ML algorithms developed on human expert-annotated features against those developed on fully automated cross-lingual (German to English) RadLex mappings using 206 CT reports of suspected stroke. Target label was whether the Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score (ASPECTS) should have been provided (yes/no:154/52). We focused on probabilistic outputs of ML-algorithms including tree-based methods, elastic net, support vector machines (SVMs) and fastText (linear classifier), which were evaluated in the same 5 × fivefold nested cross-validation framework. This allowed for model stacking and classifier rankings. Performance was evaluated using calibration metrics (AUC, brier score, log loss) and -plots. Contextual ML-based assistance recommending ASPECTS was feasible. SVMs showed the highest accuracies both on human-extracted- (87%) and RadLex features (findings:82.5%; impressions:85.4%). FastText achieved the highest accuracy (89.3%) and AUC (92%) on impressions. Boosted trees fitted on findings had the best calibration profile. Our approach provides guidance for choosing ML classifiers for CAR tools in fully automated and language-agnostic fashion using bag-of-RadLex terms on limited expert-labelled training data.Máté E. MarosChang Gyu ChoAndreas G. JungeBenedikt KämpgenVictor SaaseFabian SiegelFrederik TrinkmannThomas GanslandtChristoph GrodenHolger WenzNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-18 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Máté E. Maros
Chang Gyu Cho
Andreas G. Junge
Benedikt Kämpgen
Victor Saase
Fabian Siegel
Frederik Trinkmann
Thomas Ganslandt
Christoph Groden
Holger Wenz
Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for computer-assisted reporting based on fully automated cross-lingual RadLex mappings
description Abstract Computer-assisted reporting (CAR) tools were suggested to improve radiology report quality by context-sensitively recommending key imaging biomarkers. However, studies evaluating machine learning (ML) algorithms on cross-lingual ontological (RadLex) mappings for developing embedded CAR algorithms are lacking. Therefore, we compared ML algorithms developed on human expert-annotated features against those developed on fully automated cross-lingual (German to English) RadLex mappings using 206 CT reports of suspected stroke. Target label was whether the Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score (ASPECTS) should have been provided (yes/no:154/52). We focused on probabilistic outputs of ML-algorithms including tree-based methods, elastic net, support vector machines (SVMs) and fastText (linear classifier), which were evaluated in the same 5 × fivefold nested cross-validation framework. This allowed for model stacking and classifier rankings. Performance was evaluated using calibration metrics (AUC, brier score, log loss) and -plots. Contextual ML-based assistance recommending ASPECTS was feasible. SVMs showed the highest accuracies both on human-extracted- (87%) and RadLex features (findings:82.5%; impressions:85.4%). FastText achieved the highest accuracy (89.3%) and AUC (92%) on impressions. Boosted trees fitted on findings had the best calibration profile. Our approach provides guidance for choosing ML classifiers for CAR tools in fully automated and language-agnostic fashion using bag-of-RadLex terms on limited expert-labelled training data.
format article
author Máté E. Maros
Chang Gyu Cho
Andreas G. Junge
Benedikt Kämpgen
Victor Saase
Fabian Siegel
Frederik Trinkmann
Thomas Ganslandt
Christoph Groden
Holger Wenz
author_facet Máté E. Maros
Chang Gyu Cho
Andreas G. Junge
Benedikt Kämpgen
Victor Saase
Fabian Siegel
Frederik Trinkmann
Thomas Ganslandt
Christoph Groden
Holger Wenz
author_sort Máté E. Maros
title Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for computer-assisted reporting based on fully automated cross-lingual RadLex mappings
title_short Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for computer-assisted reporting based on fully automated cross-lingual RadLex mappings
title_full Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for computer-assisted reporting based on fully automated cross-lingual RadLex mappings
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for computer-assisted reporting based on fully automated cross-lingual RadLex mappings
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for computer-assisted reporting based on fully automated cross-lingual RadLex mappings
title_sort comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for computer-assisted reporting based on fully automated cross-lingual radlex mappings
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/12348a5318d740d1a6395bfc7358ede7
work_keys_str_mv AT mateemaros comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningalgorithmsforcomputerassistedreportingbasedonfullyautomatedcrosslingualradlexmappings
AT changgyucho comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningalgorithmsforcomputerassistedreportingbasedonfullyautomatedcrosslingualradlexmappings
AT andreasgjunge comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningalgorithmsforcomputerassistedreportingbasedonfullyautomatedcrosslingualradlexmappings
AT benediktkampgen comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningalgorithmsforcomputerassistedreportingbasedonfullyautomatedcrosslingualradlexmappings
AT victorsaase comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningalgorithmsforcomputerassistedreportingbasedonfullyautomatedcrosslingualradlexmappings
AT fabiansiegel comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningalgorithmsforcomputerassistedreportingbasedonfullyautomatedcrosslingualradlexmappings
AT frederiktrinkmann comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningalgorithmsforcomputerassistedreportingbasedonfullyautomatedcrosslingualradlexmappings
AT thomasganslandt comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningalgorithmsforcomputerassistedreportingbasedonfullyautomatedcrosslingualradlexmappings
AT christophgroden comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningalgorithmsforcomputerassistedreportingbasedonfullyautomatedcrosslingualradlexmappings
AT holgerwenz comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningalgorithmsforcomputerassistedreportingbasedonfullyautomatedcrosslingualradlexmappings
_version_ 1718385495358046208