Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for computer-assisted reporting based on fully automated cross-lingual RadLex mappings
Abstract Computer-assisted reporting (CAR) tools were suggested to improve radiology report quality by context-sensitively recommending key imaging biomarkers. However, studies evaluating machine learning (ML) algorithms on cross-lingual ontological (RadLex) mappings for developing embedded CAR algo...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/12348a5318d740d1a6395bfc7358ede7 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:12348a5318d740d1a6395bfc7358ede7 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:12348a5318d740d1a6395bfc7358ede72021-12-02T15:53:46ZComparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for computer-assisted reporting based on fully automated cross-lingual RadLex mappings10.1038/s41598-021-85016-92045-2322https://doaj.org/article/12348a5318d740d1a6395bfc7358ede72021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85016-9https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Computer-assisted reporting (CAR) tools were suggested to improve radiology report quality by context-sensitively recommending key imaging biomarkers. However, studies evaluating machine learning (ML) algorithms on cross-lingual ontological (RadLex) mappings for developing embedded CAR algorithms are lacking. Therefore, we compared ML algorithms developed on human expert-annotated features against those developed on fully automated cross-lingual (German to English) RadLex mappings using 206 CT reports of suspected stroke. Target label was whether the Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score (ASPECTS) should have been provided (yes/no:154/52). We focused on probabilistic outputs of ML-algorithms including tree-based methods, elastic net, support vector machines (SVMs) and fastText (linear classifier), which were evaluated in the same 5 × fivefold nested cross-validation framework. This allowed for model stacking and classifier rankings. Performance was evaluated using calibration metrics (AUC, brier score, log loss) and -plots. Contextual ML-based assistance recommending ASPECTS was feasible. SVMs showed the highest accuracies both on human-extracted- (87%) and RadLex features (findings:82.5%; impressions:85.4%). FastText achieved the highest accuracy (89.3%) and AUC (92%) on impressions. Boosted trees fitted on findings had the best calibration profile. Our approach provides guidance for choosing ML classifiers for CAR tools in fully automated and language-agnostic fashion using bag-of-RadLex terms on limited expert-labelled training data.Máté E. MarosChang Gyu ChoAndreas G. JungeBenedikt KämpgenVictor SaaseFabian SiegelFrederik TrinkmannThomas GanslandtChristoph GrodenHolger WenzNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-18 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Máté E. Maros Chang Gyu Cho Andreas G. Junge Benedikt Kämpgen Victor Saase Fabian Siegel Frederik Trinkmann Thomas Ganslandt Christoph Groden Holger Wenz Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for computer-assisted reporting based on fully automated cross-lingual RadLex mappings |
description |
Abstract Computer-assisted reporting (CAR) tools were suggested to improve radiology report quality by context-sensitively recommending key imaging biomarkers. However, studies evaluating machine learning (ML) algorithms on cross-lingual ontological (RadLex) mappings for developing embedded CAR algorithms are lacking. Therefore, we compared ML algorithms developed on human expert-annotated features against those developed on fully automated cross-lingual (German to English) RadLex mappings using 206 CT reports of suspected stroke. Target label was whether the Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score (ASPECTS) should have been provided (yes/no:154/52). We focused on probabilistic outputs of ML-algorithms including tree-based methods, elastic net, support vector machines (SVMs) and fastText (linear classifier), which were evaluated in the same 5 × fivefold nested cross-validation framework. This allowed for model stacking and classifier rankings. Performance was evaluated using calibration metrics (AUC, brier score, log loss) and -plots. Contextual ML-based assistance recommending ASPECTS was feasible. SVMs showed the highest accuracies both on human-extracted- (87%) and RadLex features (findings:82.5%; impressions:85.4%). FastText achieved the highest accuracy (89.3%) and AUC (92%) on impressions. Boosted trees fitted on findings had the best calibration profile. Our approach provides guidance for choosing ML classifiers for CAR tools in fully automated and language-agnostic fashion using bag-of-RadLex terms on limited expert-labelled training data. |
format |
article |
author |
Máté E. Maros Chang Gyu Cho Andreas G. Junge Benedikt Kämpgen Victor Saase Fabian Siegel Frederik Trinkmann Thomas Ganslandt Christoph Groden Holger Wenz |
author_facet |
Máté E. Maros Chang Gyu Cho Andreas G. Junge Benedikt Kämpgen Victor Saase Fabian Siegel Frederik Trinkmann Thomas Ganslandt Christoph Groden Holger Wenz |
author_sort |
Máté E. Maros |
title |
Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for computer-assisted reporting based on fully automated cross-lingual RadLex mappings |
title_short |
Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for computer-assisted reporting based on fully automated cross-lingual RadLex mappings |
title_full |
Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for computer-assisted reporting based on fully automated cross-lingual RadLex mappings |
title_fullStr |
Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for computer-assisted reporting based on fully automated cross-lingual RadLex mappings |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for computer-assisted reporting based on fully automated cross-lingual RadLex mappings |
title_sort |
comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for computer-assisted reporting based on fully automated cross-lingual radlex mappings |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/12348a5318d740d1a6395bfc7358ede7 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mateemaros comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningalgorithmsforcomputerassistedreportingbasedonfullyautomatedcrosslingualradlexmappings AT changgyucho comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningalgorithmsforcomputerassistedreportingbasedonfullyautomatedcrosslingualradlexmappings AT andreasgjunge comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningalgorithmsforcomputerassistedreportingbasedonfullyautomatedcrosslingualradlexmappings AT benediktkampgen comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningalgorithmsforcomputerassistedreportingbasedonfullyautomatedcrosslingualradlexmappings AT victorsaase comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningalgorithmsforcomputerassistedreportingbasedonfullyautomatedcrosslingualradlexmappings AT fabiansiegel comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningalgorithmsforcomputerassistedreportingbasedonfullyautomatedcrosslingualradlexmappings AT frederiktrinkmann comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningalgorithmsforcomputerassistedreportingbasedonfullyautomatedcrosslingualradlexmappings AT thomasganslandt comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningalgorithmsforcomputerassistedreportingbasedonfullyautomatedcrosslingualradlexmappings AT christophgroden comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningalgorithmsforcomputerassistedreportingbasedonfullyautomatedcrosslingualradlexmappings AT holgerwenz comparativeanalysisofmachinelearningalgorithmsforcomputerassistedreportingbasedonfullyautomatedcrosslingualradlexmappings |
_version_ |
1718385495358046208 |