Regionally Coupled Atmosphere‐Ocean‐Marine Biogeochemistry Model ROM: 2. Studying the Climate Change Signal in the North Atlantic and Europe

Abstract Climate simulations for the North Atlantic and Europe for recent and future conditions simulated with the regionally coupled ROM model are analyzed and compared to the results from the MPI‐ESM. The ROM simulations also include a biogeochemistry and ocean tides. For recent climate conditions...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dmitry V. Sein, Matthias Gröger, William Cabos, Francisco J. Alvarez‐Garcia, Stefan Hagemann, Joaquim G. Pinto, Alfredo Izquierdo, Alba de laVara, Nikolay V. Koldunov, Anton Yu. Dvornikov, Natalia Limareva, Evgenia Alekseeva, Benjamin Martinez‐Lopez, Daniela Jacob
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/12706608a90140f2a96b7c29af02daf9
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:12706608a90140f2a96b7c29af02daf9
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:12706608a90140f2a96b7c29af02daf92021-11-15T14:20:26ZRegionally Coupled Atmosphere‐Ocean‐Marine Biogeochemistry Model ROM: 2. Studying the Climate Change Signal in the North Atlantic and Europe1942-246610.1029/2019MS001646https://doaj.org/article/12706608a90140f2a96b7c29af02daf92020-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001646https://doaj.org/toc/1942-2466Abstract Climate simulations for the North Atlantic and Europe for recent and future conditions simulated with the regionally coupled ROM model are analyzed and compared to the results from the MPI‐ESM. The ROM simulations also include a biogeochemistry and ocean tides. For recent climate conditions, ROM generally improves the simulations compared to the driving model MPI‐ESM. Reduced oceanic biases in the Northern Atlantic are found, as well as a better simulation of the atmospheric circulation, notably storm tracks and blocking. Regarding future climate projections for the 21st century following the RCP 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios, MPI‐ESM and ROM largely agree qualitatively on the climate change signal over Europe. However, many important differences are identified. For example, ROM shows an SST cooling in the Subpolar Gyre, which is not present in MPI‐ESM. Under the RCP8.5 scenario, ROM Arctic sea ice cover is thinner and reaches the seasonally ice‐free state by 2055, well before MPI‐ESM. This shows the decisive importance of higher ocean resolution and regional coupling for determining the regional responses to global warming trends. Regarding biogeochemistry, both ROM and MPI‐ESM simulate a widespread decline in winter nutrient concentration in the North Atlantic of up to ~35%. On the other hand, the phytoplankton spring bloom in the Arctic and in the North‐Western Atlantic starts earlier, and the yearly primary production is enhanced in the Arctic in the late 21st century. These results clearly demonstrate the added value of ROM to determine more detailed and more reliable climate projections at the regional scale.Dmitry V. SeinMatthias GrögerWilliam CabosFrancisco J. Alvarez‐GarciaStefan HagemannJoaquim G. PintoAlfredo IzquierdoAlba de laVaraNikolay V. KoldunovAnton Yu. DvornikovNatalia LimarevaEvgenia AlekseevaBenjamin Martinez‐LopezDaniela JacobAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)articleclimate changeregional climate modelingocean biogeochemistryNorth AtlanticPhysical geographyGB3-5030OceanographyGC1-1581ENJournal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol 12, Iss 8, Pp n/a-n/a (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic climate change
regional climate modeling
ocean biogeochemistry
North Atlantic
Physical geography
GB3-5030
Oceanography
GC1-1581
spellingShingle climate change
regional climate modeling
ocean biogeochemistry
North Atlantic
Physical geography
GB3-5030
Oceanography
GC1-1581
Dmitry V. Sein
Matthias Gröger
William Cabos
Francisco J. Alvarez‐Garcia
Stefan Hagemann
Joaquim G. Pinto
Alfredo Izquierdo
Alba de laVara
Nikolay V. Koldunov
Anton Yu. Dvornikov
Natalia Limareva
Evgenia Alekseeva
Benjamin Martinez‐Lopez
Daniela Jacob
Regionally Coupled Atmosphere‐Ocean‐Marine Biogeochemistry Model ROM: 2. Studying the Climate Change Signal in the North Atlantic and Europe
description Abstract Climate simulations for the North Atlantic and Europe for recent and future conditions simulated with the regionally coupled ROM model are analyzed and compared to the results from the MPI‐ESM. The ROM simulations also include a biogeochemistry and ocean tides. For recent climate conditions, ROM generally improves the simulations compared to the driving model MPI‐ESM. Reduced oceanic biases in the Northern Atlantic are found, as well as a better simulation of the atmospheric circulation, notably storm tracks and blocking. Regarding future climate projections for the 21st century following the RCP 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios, MPI‐ESM and ROM largely agree qualitatively on the climate change signal over Europe. However, many important differences are identified. For example, ROM shows an SST cooling in the Subpolar Gyre, which is not present in MPI‐ESM. Under the RCP8.5 scenario, ROM Arctic sea ice cover is thinner and reaches the seasonally ice‐free state by 2055, well before MPI‐ESM. This shows the decisive importance of higher ocean resolution and regional coupling for determining the regional responses to global warming trends. Regarding biogeochemistry, both ROM and MPI‐ESM simulate a widespread decline in winter nutrient concentration in the North Atlantic of up to ~35%. On the other hand, the phytoplankton spring bloom in the Arctic and in the North‐Western Atlantic starts earlier, and the yearly primary production is enhanced in the Arctic in the late 21st century. These results clearly demonstrate the added value of ROM to determine more detailed and more reliable climate projections at the regional scale.
format article
author Dmitry V. Sein
Matthias Gröger
William Cabos
Francisco J. Alvarez‐Garcia
Stefan Hagemann
Joaquim G. Pinto
Alfredo Izquierdo
Alba de laVara
Nikolay V. Koldunov
Anton Yu. Dvornikov
Natalia Limareva
Evgenia Alekseeva
Benjamin Martinez‐Lopez
Daniela Jacob
author_facet Dmitry V. Sein
Matthias Gröger
William Cabos
Francisco J. Alvarez‐Garcia
Stefan Hagemann
Joaquim G. Pinto
Alfredo Izquierdo
Alba de laVara
Nikolay V. Koldunov
Anton Yu. Dvornikov
Natalia Limareva
Evgenia Alekseeva
Benjamin Martinez‐Lopez
Daniela Jacob
author_sort Dmitry V. Sein
title Regionally Coupled Atmosphere‐Ocean‐Marine Biogeochemistry Model ROM: 2. Studying the Climate Change Signal in the North Atlantic and Europe
title_short Regionally Coupled Atmosphere‐Ocean‐Marine Biogeochemistry Model ROM: 2. Studying the Climate Change Signal in the North Atlantic and Europe
title_full Regionally Coupled Atmosphere‐Ocean‐Marine Biogeochemistry Model ROM: 2. Studying the Climate Change Signal in the North Atlantic and Europe
title_fullStr Regionally Coupled Atmosphere‐Ocean‐Marine Biogeochemistry Model ROM: 2. Studying the Climate Change Signal in the North Atlantic and Europe
title_full_unstemmed Regionally Coupled Atmosphere‐Ocean‐Marine Biogeochemistry Model ROM: 2. Studying the Climate Change Signal in the North Atlantic and Europe
title_sort regionally coupled atmosphere‐ocean‐marine biogeochemistry model rom: 2. studying the climate change signal in the north atlantic and europe
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/12706608a90140f2a96b7c29af02daf9
work_keys_str_mv AT dmitryvsein regionallycoupledatmosphereoceanmarinebiogeochemistrymodelrom2studyingtheclimatechangesignalinthenorthatlanticandeurope
AT matthiasgroger regionallycoupledatmosphereoceanmarinebiogeochemistrymodelrom2studyingtheclimatechangesignalinthenorthatlanticandeurope
AT williamcabos regionallycoupledatmosphereoceanmarinebiogeochemistrymodelrom2studyingtheclimatechangesignalinthenorthatlanticandeurope
AT franciscojalvarezgarcia regionallycoupledatmosphereoceanmarinebiogeochemistrymodelrom2studyingtheclimatechangesignalinthenorthatlanticandeurope
AT stefanhagemann regionallycoupledatmosphereoceanmarinebiogeochemistrymodelrom2studyingtheclimatechangesignalinthenorthatlanticandeurope
AT joaquimgpinto regionallycoupledatmosphereoceanmarinebiogeochemistrymodelrom2studyingtheclimatechangesignalinthenorthatlanticandeurope
AT alfredoizquierdo regionallycoupledatmosphereoceanmarinebiogeochemistrymodelrom2studyingtheclimatechangesignalinthenorthatlanticandeurope
AT albadelavara regionallycoupledatmosphereoceanmarinebiogeochemistrymodelrom2studyingtheclimatechangesignalinthenorthatlanticandeurope
AT nikolayvkoldunov regionallycoupledatmosphereoceanmarinebiogeochemistrymodelrom2studyingtheclimatechangesignalinthenorthatlanticandeurope
AT antonyudvornikov regionallycoupledatmosphereoceanmarinebiogeochemistrymodelrom2studyingtheclimatechangesignalinthenorthatlanticandeurope
AT natalialimareva regionallycoupledatmosphereoceanmarinebiogeochemistrymodelrom2studyingtheclimatechangesignalinthenorthatlanticandeurope
AT evgeniaalekseeva regionallycoupledatmosphereoceanmarinebiogeochemistrymodelrom2studyingtheclimatechangesignalinthenorthatlanticandeurope
AT benjaminmartinezlopez regionallycoupledatmosphereoceanmarinebiogeochemistrymodelrom2studyingtheclimatechangesignalinthenorthatlanticandeurope
AT danielajacob regionallycoupledatmosphereoceanmarinebiogeochemistrymodelrom2studyingtheclimatechangesignalinthenorthatlanticandeurope
_version_ 1718428357635342336