Direct financial cost of weed control in smallholder rubber plantations

A survey was conducted to provide information on weed types, control strategies, and their estimated costs to smallholder rubber outgrowers in Western Ghana. A total of 80 farmers with rubber trees aged 1–4 years were randomly selected for the study. This represents 10.2% of the total number of farm...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Ansong Michael, Acheampong Emmanuel, Echeruo Joana Beulah, Afful Samuel Nuakoh, Ahimah Mathias
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	De Gruyter 2021
Materias:	plantation cost rural household sustainable development weed control rubber estate Agriculture S Agriculture (General) S1-972
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/1285e333f2b446b7b63d0f5151e1e672
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:1285e333f2b446b7b63d0f5151e1e672
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:1285e333f2b446b7b63d0f5151e1e6722021-12-05T14:10:58ZDirect financial cost of weed control in smallholder rubber plantations2391-953110.1515/opag-2021-0022https://doaj.org/article/1285e333f2b446b7b63d0f5151e1e6722021-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2021-0022https://doaj.org/toc/2391-9531A survey was conducted to provide information on weed types, control strategies, and their estimated costs to smallholder rubber outgrowers in Western Ghana. A total of 80 farmers with rubber trees aged 1–4 years were randomly selected for the study. This represents 10.2% of the total number of farmers (783) who fall within this target group in the districts. The results show that smallholder rubber plantation farmers are dealing with diverse weed species, most of which are reported as global weeds. Chromolaena odorata, Scleria boivinii, and Mimosa pudica were the most reported species. Manual weeding and application of herbicides are the major control methods adopted by the farmers in the study area with a small percentage (16%) also using cover cropping. The two major control methods cost farmers an estimated average amount of Ghc 618.24 ± 26.25 (US $140.51 ± 5.91) for one-time weed control per hectare. The average estimated cost of one-time manual weeding per hectare was higher than that of herbicide application per hectare. This estimated amount is only a fraction of the total economic cost of weeds to the farmers. The farmers are likely to spend more if, for example, the costs of yield loss due to weeds are captured. The study thus indicates that the cost of weed management is high for rubber outgrowers and essentially farmers are investing heavily in weed management to keep weed competition on-plantation relatively low. Given that the core objective of rubber growing is to maximize profits, this study recommends the application of herbicides to control weeds in rubber plantations since average estimated cost of herbicide application per hectare was lower than one-time manual weeding per hectare. This recommendation should, however, be weighed against the possible environmental impact of herbicides, which was not assessed in this study.Ansong MichaelAcheampong EmmanuelEcheruo Joana BeulahAfful Samuel NuakohAhimah MathiasDe Gruyterarticleplantation costrural householdsustainable developmentweed controlrubber estateAgricultureSAgriculture (General)S1-972ENOpen Agriculture, Vol 6, Iss 1, Pp 346-355 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	plantation cost rural household sustainable development weed control rubber estate Agriculture S Agriculture (General) S1-972
spellingShingle	plantation cost rural household sustainable development weed control rubber estate Agriculture S Agriculture (General) S1-972 Ansong Michael Acheampong Emmanuel Echeruo Joana Beulah Afful Samuel Nuakoh Ahimah Mathias Direct financial cost of weed control in smallholder rubber plantations
description	A survey was conducted to provide information on weed types, control strategies, and their estimated costs to smallholder rubber outgrowers in Western Ghana. A total of 80 farmers with rubber trees aged 1–4 years were randomly selected for the study. This represents 10.2% of the total number of farmers (783) who fall within this target group in the districts. The results show that smallholder rubber plantation farmers are dealing with diverse weed species, most of which are reported as global weeds. Chromolaena odorata, Scleria boivinii, and Mimosa pudica were the most reported species. Manual weeding and application of herbicides are the major control methods adopted by the farmers in the study area with a small percentage (16%) also using cover cropping. The two major control methods cost farmers an estimated average amount of Ghc 618.24 ± 26.25 (US $140.51 ± 5.91) for one-time weed control per hectare. The average estimated cost of one-time manual weeding per hectare was higher than that of herbicide application per hectare. This estimated amount is only a fraction of the total economic cost of weeds to the farmers. The farmers are likely to spend more if, for example, the costs of yield loss due to weeds are captured. The study thus indicates that the cost of weed management is high for rubber outgrowers and essentially farmers are investing heavily in weed management to keep weed competition on-plantation relatively low. Given that the core objective of rubber growing is to maximize profits, this study recommends the application of herbicides to control weeds in rubber plantations since average estimated cost of herbicide application per hectare was lower than one-time manual weeding per hectare. This recommendation should, however, be weighed against the possible environmental impact of herbicides, which was not assessed in this study.
format	article
author	Ansong Michael Acheampong Emmanuel Echeruo Joana Beulah Afful Samuel Nuakoh Ahimah Mathias
author_facet	Ansong Michael Acheampong Emmanuel Echeruo Joana Beulah Afful Samuel Nuakoh Ahimah Mathias
author_sort	Ansong Michael
title	Direct financial cost of weed control in smallholder rubber plantations
title_short	Direct financial cost of weed control in smallholder rubber plantations
title_full	Direct financial cost of weed control in smallholder rubber plantations
title_fullStr	Direct financial cost of weed control in smallholder rubber plantations
title_full_unstemmed	Direct financial cost of weed control in smallholder rubber plantations
title_sort	direct financial cost of weed control in smallholder rubber plantations
publisher	De Gruyter
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/1285e333f2b446b7b63d0f5151e1e672
work_keys_str_mv	AT ansongmichael directfinancialcostofweedcontrolinsmallholderrubberplantations AT acheampongemmanuel directfinancialcostofweedcontrolinsmallholderrubberplantations AT echeruojoanabeulah directfinancialcostofweedcontrolinsmallholderrubberplantations AT affulsamuelnuakoh directfinancialcostofweedcontrolinsmallholderrubberplantations AT ahimahmathias directfinancialcostofweedcontrolinsmallholderrubberplantations
_version_	1718371522090893312

Direct financial cost of weed control in smallholder rubber plantations

Ejemplares similares