The best alternative for estimating reference crop evapotranspiration in different sub-regions of mainland China
Abstract Reference crop evapotranspiration (ET o) is a critically important parameter for climatological, hydrological and agricultural management. The FAO56 Penman-Monteith (PM) equation has been recommended as the standardized ET o (ET o,s) equation, but it has a high requirements of climatic data...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/12cd0566c22e4afdb7ab0e3b3fc8974a |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:12cd0566c22e4afdb7ab0e3b3fc8974a |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:12cd0566c22e4afdb7ab0e3b3fc8974a2021-12-02T11:52:39ZThe best alternative for estimating reference crop evapotranspiration in different sub-regions of mainland China10.1038/s41598-017-05660-y2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/12cd0566c22e4afdb7ab0e3b3fc8974a2017-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05660-yhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Reference crop evapotranspiration (ET o) is a critically important parameter for climatological, hydrological and agricultural management. The FAO56 Penman-Monteith (PM) equation has been recommended as the standardized ET o (ET o,s) equation, but it has a high requirements of climatic data. There is a practical need for finding a best alternative method to estimate ET o in the regions where full climatic data are lacking. A comprehensive comparison for the spatiotemporal variations, relative errors, standard deviations and Nash-Sutcliffe efficacy coefficients of monthly or annual ET o,s and ET o,i (i = 1, 2, …, 10) values estimated by 10 selected methods (i.e., Irmak et al., Makkink, Priestley-Taylor, Hargreaves-Samani, Droogers-Allen, Berti et al., Doorenbos-Pruitt, Wright and Valiantzas, respectively) using data at 552 sites over 1961–2013 in mainland China. The method proposed by Berti et al. (2014) was selected as the best alternative of FAO56-PM because it was simple in computation process, only utilized temperature data, had generally good accuracy in describing spatiotemporal characteristics of ET o,s in different sub-regions and mainland China, and correlated linearly to the FAO56-PM method very well. The parameters of the linear correlations between ET o of the two methods are calibrated for each site with the smallest determination of coefficient being 0.87.Lingling PengYi LiHao FengNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-19 (2017) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Lingling Peng Yi Li Hao Feng The best alternative for estimating reference crop evapotranspiration in different sub-regions of mainland China |
description |
Abstract Reference crop evapotranspiration (ET o) is a critically important parameter for climatological, hydrological and agricultural management. The FAO56 Penman-Monteith (PM) equation has been recommended as the standardized ET o (ET o,s) equation, but it has a high requirements of climatic data. There is a practical need for finding a best alternative method to estimate ET o in the regions where full climatic data are lacking. A comprehensive comparison for the spatiotemporal variations, relative errors, standard deviations and Nash-Sutcliffe efficacy coefficients of monthly or annual ET o,s and ET o,i (i = 1, 2, …, 10) values estimated by 10 selected methods (i.e., Irmak et al., Makkink, Priestley-Taylor, Hargreaves-Samani, Droogers-Allen, Berti et al., Doorenbos-Pruitt, Wright and Valiantzas, respectively) using data at 552 sites over 1961–2013 in mainland China. The method proposed by Berti et al. (2014) was selected as the best alternative of FAO56-PM because it was simple in computation process, only utilized temperature data, had generally good accuracy in describing spatiotemporal characteristics of ET o,s in different sub-regions and mainland China, and correlated linearly to the FAO56-PM method very well. The parameters of the linear correlations between ET o of the two methods are calibrated for each site with the smallest determination of coefficient being 0.87. |
format |
article |
author |
Lingling Peng Yi Li Hao Feng |
author_facet |
Lingling Peng Yi Li Hao Feng |
author_sort |
Lingling Peng |
title |
The best alternative for estimating reference crop evapotranspiration in different sub-regions of mainland China |
title_short |
The best alternative for estimating reference crop evapotranspiration in different sub-regions of mainland China |
title_full |
The best alternative for estimating reference crop evapotranspiration in different sub-regions of mainland China |
title_fullStr |
The best alternative for estimating reference crop evapotranspiration in different sub-regions of mainland China |
title_full_unstemmed |
The best alternative for estimating reference crop evapotranspiration in different sub-regions of mainland China |
title_sort |
best alternative for estimating reference crop evapotranspiration in different sub-regions of mainland china |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/12cd0566c22e4afdb7ab0e3b3fc8974a |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT linglingpeng thebestalternativeforestimatingreferencecropevapotranspirationindifferentsubregionsofmainlandchina AT yili thebestalternativeforestimatingreferencecropevapotranspirationindifferentsubregionsofmainlandchina AT haofeng thebestalternativeforestimatingreferencecropevapotranspirationindifferentsubregionsofmainlandchina AT linglingpeng bestalternativeforestimatingreferencecropevapotranspirationindifferentsubregionsofmainlandchina AT yili bestalternativeforestimatingreferencecropevapotranspirationindifferentsubregionsofmainlandchina AT haofeng bestalternativeforestimatingreferencecropevapotranspirationindifferentsubregionsofmainlandchina |
_version_ |
1718394966959456256 |