The Journal Impact Factor Might Be Useful But, for What, Precisely?

In this paper I evaluate the Journal Impact Factor using a theory of measurement. To measure a concept adequately, our theory of measurement requires an adequate measurement strategy: correspondence between three steps—the characterisation of the concept, its representation, and the procedures follo...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Melissa Vergara-Fernández
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FR
Publicado: Association Œconomia 2021
Materias:
H
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/12d9fe976a7f4440b9d5d6cdb4566b68
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:12d9fe976a7f4440b9d5d6cdb4566b68
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:12d9fe976a7f4440b9d5d6cdb4566b682021-12-02T11:01:47ZThe Journal Impact Factor Might Be Useful But, for What, Precisely?2113-52072269-845010.4000/oeconomia.11593https://doaj.org/article/12d9fe976a7f4440b9d5d6cdb4566b682021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journals.openedition.org/oeconomia/11593https://doaj.org/toc/2113-5207https://doaj.org/toc/2269-8450In this paper I evaluate the Journal Impact Factor using a theory of measurement. To measure a concept adequately, our theory of measurement requires an adequate measurement strategy: correspondence between three steps—the characterisation of the concept, its representation, and the procedures followed to carry out the measurement—and fitness for a purpose. On this basis, I suggest that the uses given to the JIF as a measurement tool are unwarranted. The JIF does not have the machinery to adequately measure what it is usually taken to measure. The bottom line is not that the JIF ought to be eschewed. The bottom line is rather that an adequate measurement strategy is needed.Melissa Vergara-FernándezAssociation Œconomiaarticlejournal impact factorcitation indexinghistory of economicstheory of measurementSocial SciencesHENFRŒconomia, Vol 11, Iss 3, Pp 473-484 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FR
topic journal impact factor
citation indexing
history of economics
theory of measurement
Social Sciences
H
spellingShingle journal impact factor
citation indexing
history of economics
theory of measurement
Social Sciences
H
Melissa Vergara-Fernández
The Journal Impact Factor Might Be Useful But, for What, Precisely?
description In this paper I evaluate the Journal Impact Factor using a theory of measurement. To measure a concept adequately, our theory of measurement requires an adequate measurement strategy: correspondence between three steps—the characterisation of the concept, its representation, and the procedures followed to carry out the measurement—and fitness for a purpose. On this basis, I suggest that the uses given to the JIF as a measurement tool are unwarranted. The JIF does not have the machinery to adequately measure what it is usually taken to measure. The bottom line is not that the JIF ought to be eschewed. The bottom line is rather that an adequate measurement strategy is needed.
format article
author Melissa Vergara-Fernández
author_facet Melissa Vergara-Fernández
author_sort Melissa Vergara-Fernández
title The Journal Impact Factor Might Be Useful But, for What, Precisely?
title_short The Journal Impact Factor Might Be Useful But, for What, Precisely?
title_full The Journal Impact Factor Might Be Useful But, for What, Precisely?
title_fullStr The Journal Impact Factor Might Be Useful But, for What, Precisely?
title_full_unstemmed The Journal Impact Factor Might Be Useful But, for What, Precisely?
title_sort journal impact factor might be useful but, for what, precisely?
publisher Association Œconomia
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/12d9fe976a7f4440b9d5d6cdb4566b68
work_keys_str_mv AT melissavergarafernandez thejournalimpactfactormightbeusefulbutforwhatprecisely
AT melissavergarafernandez journalimpactfactormightbeusefulbutforwhatprecisely
_version_ 1718396337807949824