Role of the fronto-parietal cortex in prospective action judgments
Abstract Prospective judgments about one’s capability to perform an action are assumed to involve mental simulation of the action. Previous studies of motor imagery suggest this simulation is supported by a large fronto-parietal network including the motor system. Experiment 1 used fMRI to assess th...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/12f5875bbf904f93ac076ea4e85073fc |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:12f5875bbf904f93ac076ea4e85073fc |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:12f5875bbf904f93ac076ea4e85073fc2021-12-02T18:17:54ZRole of the fronto-parietal cortex in prospective action judgments10.1038/s41598-021-86719-92045-2322https://doaj.org/article/12f5875bbf904f93ac076ea4e85073fc2021-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86719-9https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Prospective judgments about one’s capability to perform an action are assumed to involve mental simulation of the action. Previous studies of motor imagery suggest this simulation is supported by a large fronto-parietal network including the motor system. Experiment 1 used fMRI to assess the contribution of this fronto-parietal network to judgments about one’s capacity to grasp objects of different sizes between index and thumb. The neural network underlying prospective graspability judgments overlapped the fronto-parietal network involved in explicit motor imagery of grasping. However, shared areas were located in the right hemisphere, outside the motor cortex, and were also activated during perceptual length judgments, suggesting a contribution to object size estimate rather than motor simulation. Experiment 2 used TMS over the motor cortex to probe transient excitability changes undetected with fMRI. Results show that graspability judgments elicited a selective increase of excitability in the thumb and index muscles, which was maximal before the object display and intermediate during the judgment. Together, these findings suggest that prospective action judgments do not rely on the motor system to simulate the action per se but to refresh the memory of one’s maximal grip aperture and facilitate its comparison with object size in right fronto-parietal areas.Laurie GeersMauro PesentiGerard DerosiereJulie DuqueLaurence DricotMichael AndresNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-15 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Laurie Geers Mauro Pesenti Gerard Derosiere Julie Duque Laurence Dricot Michael Andres Role of the fronto-parietal cortex in prospective action judgments |
description |
Abstract Prospective judgments about one’s capability to perform an action are assumed to involve mental simulation of the action. Previous studies of motor imagery suggest this simulation is supported by a large fronto-parietal network including the motor system. Experiment 1 used fMRI to assess the contribution of this fronto-parietal network to judgments about one’s capacity to grasp objects of different sizes between index and thumb. The neural network underlying prospective graspability judgments overlapped the fronto-parietal network involved in explicit motor imagery of grasping. However, shared areas were located in the right hemisphere, outside the motor cortex, and were also activated during perceptual length judgments, suggesting a contribution to object size estimate rather than motor simulation. Experiment 2 used TMS over the motor cortex to probe transient excitability changes undetected with fMRI. Results show that graspability judgments elicited a selective increase of excitability in the thumb and index muscles, which was maximal before the object display and intermediate during the judgment. Together, these findings suggest that prospective action judgments do not rely on the motor system to simulate the action per se but to refresh the memory of one’s maximal grip aperture and facilitate its comparison with object size in right fronto-parietal areas. |
format |
article |
author |
Laurie Geers Mauro Pesenti Gerard Derosiere Julie Duque Laurence Dricot Michael Andres |
author_facet |
Laurie Geers Mauro Pesenti Gerard Derosiere Julie Duque Laurence Dricot Michael Andres |
author_sort |
Laurie Geers |
title |
Role of the fronto-parietal cortex in prospective action judgments |
title_short |
Role of the fronto-parietal cortex in prospective action judgments |
title_full |
Role of the fronto-parietal cortex in prospective action judgments |
title_fullStr |
Role of the fronto-parietal cortex in prospective action judgments |
title_full_unstemmed |
Role of the fronto-parietal cortex in prospective action judgments |
title_sort |
role of the fronto-parietal cortex in prospective action judgments |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/12f5875bbf904f93ac076ea4e85073fc |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lauriegeers roleofthefrontoparietalcortexinprospectiveactionjudgments AT mauropesenti roleofthefrontoparietalcortexinprospectiveactionjudgments AT gerardderosiere roleofthefrontoparietalcortexinprospectiveactionjudgments AT julieduque roleofthefrontoparietalcortexinprospectiveactionjudgments AT laurencedricot roleofthefrontoparietalcortexinprospectiveactionjudgments AT michaelandres roleofthefrontoparietalcortexinprospectiveactionjudgments |
_version_ |
1718378258150457344 |