Role of the fronto-parietal cortex in prospective action judgments

Abstract Prospective judgments about one’s capability to perform an action are assumed to involve mental simulation of the action. Previous studies of motor imagery suggest this simulation is supported by a large fronto-parietal network including the motor system. Experiment 1 used fMRI to assess th...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laurie Geers, Mauro Pesenti, Gerard Derosiere, Julie Duque, Laurence Dricot, Michael Andres
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/12f5875bbf904f93ac076ea4e85073fc
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:12f5875bbf904f93ac076ea4e85073fc
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:12f5875bbf904f93ac076ea4e85073fc2021-12-02T18:17:54ZRole of the fronto-parietal cortex in prospective action judgments10.1038/s41598-021-86719-92045-2322https://doaj.org/article/12f5875bbf904f93ac076ea4e85073fc2021-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86719-9https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Prospective judgments about one’s capability to perform an action are assumed to involve mental simulation of the action. Previous studies of motor imagery suggest this simulation is supported by a large fronto-parietal network including the motor system. Experiment 1 used fMRI to assess the contribution of this fronto-parietal network to judgments about one’s capacity to grasp objects of different sizes between index and thumb. The neural network underlying prospective graspability judgments overlapped the fronto-parietal network involved in explicit motor imagery of grasping. However, shared areas were located in the right hemisphere, outside the motor cortex, and were also activated during perceptual length judgments, suggesting a contribution to object size estimate rather than motor simulation. Experiment 2 used TMS over the motor cortex to probe transient excitability changes undetected with fMRI. Results show that graspability judgments elicited a selective increase of excitability in the thumb and index muscles, which was maximal before the object display and intermediate during the judgment. Together, these findings suggest that prospective action judgments do not rely on the motor system to simulate the action per se but to refresh the memory of one’s maximal grip aperture and facilitate its comparison with object size in right fronto-parietal areas.Laurie GeersMauro PesentiGerard DerosiereJulie DuqueLaurence DricotMichael AndresNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-15 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Laurie Geers
Mauro Pesenti
Gerard Derosiere
Julie Duque
Laurence Dricot
Michael Andres
Role of the fronto-parietal cortex in prospective action judgments
description Abstract Prospective judgments about one’s capability to perform an action are assumed to involve mental simulation of the action. Previous studies of motor imagery suggest this simulation is supported by a large fronto-parietal network including the motor system. Experiment 1 used fMRI to assess the contribution of this fronto-parietal network to judgments about one’s capacity to grasp objects of different sizes between index and thumb. The neural network underlying prospective graspability judgments overlapped the fronto-parietal network involved in explicit motor imagery of grasping. However, shared areas were located in the right hemisphere, outside the motor cortex, and were also activated during perceptual length judgments, suggesting a contribution to object size estimate rather than motor simulation. Experiment 2 used TMS over the motor cortex to probe transient excitability changes undetected with fMRI. Results show that graspability judgments elicited a selective increase of excitability in the thumb and index muscles, which was maximal before the object display and intermediate during the judgment. Together, these findings suggest that prospective action judgments do not rely on the motor system to simulate the action per se but to refresh the memory of one’s maximal grip aperture and facilitate its comparison with object size in right fronto-parietal areas.
format article
author Laurie Geers
Mauro Pesenti
Gerard Derosiere
Julie Duque
Laurence Dricot
Michael Andres
author_facet Laurie Geers
Mauro Pesenti
Gerard Derosiere
Julie Duque
Laurence Dricot
Michael Andres
author_sort Laurie Geers
title Role of the fronto-parietal cortex in prospective action judgments
title_short Role of the fronto-parietal cortex in prospective action judgments
title_full Role of the fronto-parietal cortex in prospective action judgments
title_fullStr Role of the fronto-parietal cortex in prospective action judgments
title_full_unstemmed Role of the fronto-parietal cortex in prospective action judgments
title_sort role of the fronto-parietal cortex in prospective action judgments
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/12f5875bbf904f93ac076ea4e85073fc
work_keys_str_mv AT lauriegeers roleofthefrontoparietalcortexinprospectiveactionjudgments
AT mauropesenti roleofthefrontoparietalcortexinprospectiveactionjudgments
AT gerardderosiere roleofthefrontoparietalcortexinprospectiveactionjudgments
AT julieduque roleofthefrontoparietalcortexinprospectiveactionjudgments
AT laurencedricot roleofthefrontoparietalcortexinprospectiveactionjudgments
AT michaelandres roleofthefrontoparietalcortexinprospectiveactionjudgments
_version_ 1718378258150457344