Reality of Norms and Reality: A reply to Fred Grünfeld

<p>In a previous issue of this journal Fred Grünfeld argues that while lawyers fail to take into account social reality once a legal norm has been determined, international relations scholars “skip the norm” and research social reality. On the basis of the subsequent demonstrations, Gr...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Michal Onderco
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Amsterdam Law Forum 2012
Materias:	lawyers social scientists IR scholars Law K
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/130c583180184cb3a960161c80deffb5
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:130c583180184cb3a960161c80deffb5
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:130c583180184cb3a960161c80deffb52021-12-02T03:35:01ZReality of Norms and Reality: A reply to Fred Grünfeld1876-8156https://doaj.org/article/130c583180184cb3a960161c80deffb52012-02-01T00:00:00Zhttp://ojs.ubvu.vu.nl/alf/article/view/249https://doaj.org/toc/1876-8156<p>In a previous issue of this journal Fred Grünfeld argues that while lawyers fail to take into account social reality once a legal norm has been determined, international relations scholars “skip the norm” and research social reality. On the basis of the subsequent demonstrations, Grünfeld contended (quite rightly) that lawyers and social scientists are not familiar with each other’s work, while studying the same phenomena, although in “different phases”. He, however, argues that such division should be kept in place and lawyers and social scientists should remain working separately. In this reply, I will address both the empirical elements of Grünfeld’s argument as well as his substantive argument of keeping the two disciplines separated.</p><br />Michal OndercoAmsterdam Law Forumarticlelawyerssocial scientistsIR scholarsLawKENAmsterdam Law Forum, Vol 4, Iss 1, Pp 143-149 (2012)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	lawyers social scientists IR scholars Law K
spellingShingle	lawyers social scientists IR scholars Law K Michal Onderco Reality of Norms and Reality: A reply to Fred Grünfeld
description	<p>In a previous issue of this journal Fred Grünfeld argues that while lawyers fail to take into account social reality once a legal norm has been determined, international relations scholars “skip the norm” and research social reality. On the basis of the subsequent demonstrations, Grünfeld contended (quite rightly) that lawyers and social scientists are not familiar with each other’s work, while studying the same phenomena, although in “different phases”. He, however, argues that such division should be kept in place and lawyers and social scientists should remain working separately. In this reply, I will address both the empirical elements of Grünfeld’s argument as well as his substantive argument of keeping the two disciplines separated.</p><br />
format	article
author	Michal Onderco
author_facet	Michal Onderco
author_sort	Michal Onderco
title	Reality of Norms and Reality: A reply to Fred Grünfeld
title_short	Reality of Norms and Reality: A reply to Fred Grünfeld
title_full	Reality of Norms and Reality: A reply to Fred Grünfeld
title_fullStr	Reality of Norms and Reality: A reply to Fred Grünfeld
title_full_unstemmed	Reality of Norms and Reality: A reply to Fred Grünfeld
title_sort	reality of norms and reality: a reply to fred grünfeld
publisher	Amsterdam Law Forum
publishDate	2012
url	https://doaj.org/article/130c583180184cb3a960161c80deffb5
work_keys_str_mv	AT michalonderco realityofnormsandrealityareplytofredgrunfeld
_version_	1718401714605785088

Reality of Norms and Reality: A reply to Fred Grünfeld

Ejemplares similares