Is the “new” always “new”? Theoretical framework problems of new political parties’ research: The Czech Republic experience

New political parties can be essential holders of party systems’ change. A lot of scholars underline this reality. In fact, it is often not enough only to establish a new political subject. There is a significant relationship between a new party emergence and the subsequent electoral success, which...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Šárovec Daniel
Formato: article
Lenguaje:CS
EN
SK
Publicado: Sciendo 2019
Materias:
J
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1324b5945a6e4ede81e038ef69e4170d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1324b5945a6e4ede81e038ef69e4170d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1324b5945a6e4ede81e038ef69e4170d2021-12-02T15:27:55ZIs the “new” always “new”? Theoretical framework problems of new political parties’ research: The Czech Republic experience1801-342210.2478/pce-2019-0003https://doaj.org/article/1324b5945a6e4ede81e038ef69e4170d2019-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2019-0003https://doaj.org/toc/1801-3422New political parties can be essential holders of party systems’ change. A lot of scholars underline this reality. In fact, it is often not enough only to establish a new political subject. There is a significant relationship between a new party emergence and the subsequent electoral success, which is often an overlooked research dimension. This article intends to focus on the most important features narrowly connected with new political parties’ study approaches. There is no concurrence on what a new political party exactly is. It is possible to find a whole range of high-quality based articles exploring newness in a current or recent state of knowledge. Despite it, this research still has several substantial doubts about this question. Examples of Czech political parties that have been successful in the first-order elections (FOE) and where the problematic aspects of their declared novelty can be traced will be compared here. The evidence of complexity pertaining to this phenomenon is obvious: every political party is new in the moment of its formation in reality, but on the other hand not every political party is new regarding an appropriate theoretical concept. This empirical base shows that declared novelty can be rather more a tool of broader communication and image strategy than a real indisputable party attribute.Šárovec DanielSciendoarticlepolitical partiesnew political partiesnewnesselectoral successczech republicparty systemPolitical scienceJCSENSKPolitics in Central Europe, Vol 15, Iss 1, Pp 55-80 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language CS
EN
SK
topic political parties
new political parties
newness
electoral success
czech republic
party system
Political science
J
spellingShingle political parties
new political parties
newness
electoral success
czech republic
party system
Political science
J
Šárovec Daniel
Is the “new” always “new”? Theoretical framework problems of new political parties’ research: The Czech Republic experience
description New political parties can be essential holders of party systems’ change. A lot of scholars underline this reality. In fact, it is often not enough only to establish a new political subject. There is a significant relationship between a new party emergence and the subsequent electoral success, which is often an overlooked research dimension. This article intends to focus on the most important features narrowly connected with new political parties’ study approaches. There is no concurrence on what a new political party exactly is. It is possible to find a whole range of high-quality based articles exploring newness in a current or recent state of knowledge. Despite it, this research still has several substantial doubts about this question. Examples of Czech political parties that have been successful in the first-order elections (FOE) and where the problematic aspects of their declared novelty can be traced will be compared here. The evidence of complexity pertaining to this phenomenon is obvious: every political party is new in the moment of its formation in reality, but on the other hand not every political party is new regarding an appropriate theoretical concept. This empirical base shows that declared novelty can be rather more a tool of broader communication and image strategy than a real indisputable party attribute.
format article
author Šárovec Daniel
author_facet Šárovec Daniel
author_sort Šárovec Daniel
title Is the “new” always “new”? Theoretical framework problems of new political parties’ research: The Czech Republic experience
title_short Is the “new” always “new”? Theoretical framework problems of new political parties’ research: The Czech Republic experience
title_full Is the “new” always “new”? Theoretical framework problems of new political parties’ research: The Czech Republic experience
title_fullStr Is the “new” always “new”? Theoretical framework problems of new political parties’ research: The Czech Republic experience
title_full_unstemmed Is the “new” always “new”? Theoretical framework problems of new political parties’ research: The Czech Republic experience
title_sort is the “new” always “new”? theoretical framework problems of new political parties’ research: the czech republic experience
publisher Sciendo
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/1324b5945a6e4ede81e038ef69e4170d
work_keys_str_mv AT sarovecdaniel isthenewalwaysnewtheoreticalframeworkproblemsofnewpoliticalpartiesresearchtheczechrepublicexperience
_version_ 1718387186543362048