Competing Visions of Islam in the United States
Barring the initial works of a handful of scholars over the last 50 years, Muslim communities and their understanding of Islam in America have gone relatively unstudied in relation to other religious groups. The lacuna now, however, has been partially filled by the work of Kambiz GhaneaBassiri in a...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
International Institute of Islamic Thought
1998
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/133c25b0daee4c62b914b68ae9f20906 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Barring the initial works of a handful of scholars over the last 50 years,
Muslim communities and their understanding of Islam in America have gone
relatively unstudied in relation to other religious groups. The lacuna now, however,
has been partially filled by the work of Kambiz GhaneaBassiri in a concise
but complete in-way-of-issues-mentioned manner. Primarily a secondary
source, it relies heavily on the initial works produced by scholars such as
Yvonne Haddad, Adair T. Lummis, Earle Waugh. Aminah McCloud, and Atif
Wasfi. The book is the first of a second generation of work on the subject
Using a purely sociological method and lens, the book analyzes the findings of
the works that came before it, coupling a case study of the views, opinions, and
attitudes of different constituents of the Muslim populace of Los Angeles with
the more cross-sectional approach used by the aforementioned scholars. The
work raises fundamental questions regarding the validity of studying sociologically
the American Muslim condition; whether a truly American Muslim condition
exists; and (if it does) its characteristic features. Nevertheless, Kambiz
GhaneaBassiri's work indexes, in a cartographic manner, the competing visions
of Islam in the United States.
Within the introduction of his work, the author outlines the purpose and
methodology of his study. Departing from the writings and approach of Haddad,
Lummis, Waugh, McCloud, and Wasfi, he makes his intention clear: to use surveys
to examine the religious identity of Muslims in the United States by determining
how they define their role as American citizens. His already enigmatic
definition of a religious identity, however, being an amalgam of one's "desires,"
"needs," "cultural and ethnic background" and "level of religious understanding,"
missed certain key elements. The roles of intention and volitional acts
the main components of the textual definition of Muslim identity-outlined
within the Qur'an and Sunnah, more than the categories used in the study, define
Muslim identity. The lack of a clear definition of Muslim identity and the inability
of the study to operationalize it are the work's two main weaknesses.
Nowhere in the work is it scientifically illustrated or articulated that a case study ...
|
|---|