Adaptive control of movement deceleration during saccades.

As you read this text, your eyes make saccades that guide your fovea from one word to the next. Accuracy of these movements require the brain to monitor and learn from visual errors. A current model suggests that learning is supported by two different adaptive processes, one fast (high error sensiti...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simon P Orozco, Scott T Albert, Reza Shadmehr
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/133c38599b464667a4b5a2d47f7fe055
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:133c38599b464667a4b5a2d47f7fe055
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:133c38599b464667a4b5a2d47f7fe0552021-12-02T19:57:25ZAdaptive control of movement deceleration during saccades.1553-734X1553-735810.1371/journal.pcbi.1009176https://doaj.org/article/133c38599b464667a4b5a2d47f7fe0552021-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009176https://doaj.org/toc/1553-734Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/1553-7358As you read this text, your eyes make saccades that guide your fovea from one word to the next. Accuracy of these movements require the brain to monitor and learn from visual errors. A current model suggests that learning is supported by two different adaptive processes, one fast (high error sensitivity, low retention), and the other slow (low error sensitivity, high retention). Here, we searched for signatures of these hypothesized processes and found that following experience of a visual error, there was an adaptive change in the motor commands of the subsequent saccade. Surprisingly, this adaptation was not uniformly expressed throughout the movement. Rather, after experience of a single error, the adaptive response in the subsequent trial was limited to the deceleration period. After repeated exposure to the same error, the acceleration period commands also adapted, and exhibited resistance to forgetting during set-breaks. In contrast, the deceleration period commands adapted more rapidly, but suffered from poor retention during these same breaks. State-space models suggested that acceleration and deceleration periods were supported by a shared adaptive state which re-aimed the saccade, as well as two separate processes which resembled a two-state model: one that learned slowly and contributed primarily via acceleration period commands, and another that learned rapidly but contributed primarily via deceleration period commands.Simon P OrozcoScott T AlbertReza ShadmehrPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleBiology (General)QH301-705.5ENPLoS Computational Biology, Vol 17, Iss 7, p e1009176 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
spellingShingle Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Simon P Orozco
Scott T Albert
Reza Shadmehr
Adaptive control of movement deceleration during saccades.
description As you read this text, your eyes make saccades that guide your fovea from one word to the next. Accuracy of these movements require the brain to monitor and learn from visual errors. A current model suggests that learning is supported by two different adaptive processes, one fast (high error sensitivity, low retention), and the other slow (low error sensitivity, high retention). Here, we searched for signatures of these hypothesized processes and found that following experience of a visual error, there was an adaptive change in the motor commands of the subsequent saccade. Surprisingly, this adaptation was not uniformly expressed throughout the movement. Rather, after experience of a single error, the adaptive response in the subsequent trial was limited to the deceleration period. After repeated exposure to the same error, the acceleration period commands also adapted, and exhibited resistance to forgetting during set-breaks. In contrast, the deceleration period commands adapted more rapidly, but suffered from poor retention during these same breaks. State-space models suggested that acceleration and deceleration periods were supported by a shared adaptive state which re-aimed the saccade, as well as two separate processes which resembled a two-state model: one that learned slowly and contributed primarily via acceleration period commands, and another that learned rapidly but contributed primarily via deceleration period commands.
format article
author Simon P Orozco
Scott T Albert
Reza Shadmehr
author_facet Simon P Orozco
Scott T Albert
Reza Shadmehr
author_sort Simon P Orozco
title Adaptive control of movement deceleration during saccades.
title_short Adaptive control of movement deceleration during saccades.
title_full Adaptive control of movement deceleration during saccades.
title_fullStr Adaptive control of movement deceleration during saccades.
title_full_unstemmed Adaptive control of movement deceleration during saccades.
title_sort adaptive control of movement deceleration during saccades.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/133c38599b464667a4b5a2d47f7fe055
work_keys_str_mv AT simonporozco adaptivecontrolofmovementdecelerationduringsaccades
AT scotttalbert adaptivecontrolofmovementdecelerationduringsaccades
AT rezashadmehr adaptivecontrolofmovementdecelerationduringsaccades
_version_ 1718375825341939712