Multicolor imaging in central serous chorioretinopathy – a quantitative and qualitative comparison with fundus autofluorescence

Abstract Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) is characterised by choroidal hyperpermeability which results in neurosensory detachments (NSD) along with numerous retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) alterations such as RPE atrophy. Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) demonstrates the functionality of the R...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vishal Govindahari, Sumit Randhir Singh, Bindu Rajesh, Roberto Gallego-Pinazo, Rosa Dolz Marco, Dhanya V. Nair, Unni Nair, Jay Chhablani
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2019
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1341c2ce7b144b6793ba223c69e49deb
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1341c2ce7b144b6793ba223c69e49deb
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1341c2ce7b144b6793ba223c69e49deb2021-12-02T16:08:28ZMulticolor imaging in central serous chorioretinopathy – a quantitative and qualitative comparison with fundus autofluorescence10.1038/s41598-019-48040-42045-2322https://doaj.org/article/1341c2ce7b144b6793ba223c69e49deb2019-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48040-4https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) is characterised by choroidal hyperpermeability which results in neurosensory detachments (NSD) along with numerous retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) alterations such as RPE atrophy. Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) demonstrates the functionality of the RPE while multicolor imaging(MCI), by means of its three incident wavelengths, provides insight into clinical changes at various levels of the retina and choroid in CSCR. This study compares various clinical findings in CSCR (NSD, subretinal deposits, RPE atrophy, pigment epithelial detachments (PED) and pachyvessels) on the above mentioned imaging modalities both qualitatively and quantitatively. MCI showed higher mean cumulative area of RPE atrophic patches (6.3 ± 6.02 vs 5.7 ± 5.7 mm2, p = 0.046), PED (1.3 ± 1.4 vs 1.1 ± 1.2 mm2, p = 0.068) and NSD (17.2 ± 11.4 vs 15.7 ± 10.7 mm2, p = 0.033). MCI demonstrated better defined lesions (NSD, PED, RPE atrophy) and more number of eyes with PED and pachyvessels in comparison to FAF.Both investigations had a 100% sensitivity in detecting NSD and 100% specificity for sub retinal deposits. This study demonstrates the ability of MCI to quantitatively and qualitatively define various clinical features in CSCR and the advantages it holds over FAF. MCI can hence be considered as a useful imaging modality in documenting and monitoring various structural changes in eyes with CSCR.Vishal GovindahariSumit Randhir SinghBindu RajeshRoberto Gallego-PinazoRosa Dolz MarcoDhanya V. NairUnni NairJay ChhablaniNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Vishal Govindahari
Sumit Randhir Singh
Bindu Rajesh
Roberto Gallego-Pinazo
Rosa Dolz Marco
Dhanya V. Nair
Unni Nair
Jay Chhablani
Multicolor imaging in central serous chorioretinopathy – a quantitative and qualitative comparison with fundus autofluorescence
description Abstract Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) is characterised by choroidal hyperpermeability which results in neurosensory detachments (NSD) along with numerous retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) alterations such as RPE atrophy. Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) demonstrates the functionality of the RPE while multicolor imaging(MCI), by means of its three incident wavelengths, provides insight into clinical changes at various levels of the retina and choroid in CSCR. This study compares various clinical findings in CSCR (NSD, subretinal deposits, RPE atrophy, pigment epithelial detachments (PED) and pachyvessels) on the above mentioned imaging modalities both qualitatively and quantitatively. MCI showed higher mean cumulative area of RPE atrophic patches (6.3 ± 6.02 vs 5.7 ± 5.7 mm2, p = 0.046), PED (1.3 ± 1.4 vs 1.1 ± 1.2 mm2, p = 0.068) and NSD (17.2 ± 11.4 vs 15.7 ± 10.7 mm2, p = 0.033). MCI demonstrated better defined lesions (NSD, PED, RPE atrophy) and more number of eyes with PED and pachyvessels in comparison to FAF.Both investigations had a 100% sensitivity in detecting NSD and 100% specificity for sub retinal deposits. This study demonstrates the ability of MCI to quantitatively and qualitatively define various clinical features in CSCR and the advantages it holds over FAF. MCI can hence be considered as a useful imaging modality in documenting and monitoring various structural changes in eyes with CSCR.
format article
author Vishal Govindahari
Sumit Randhir Singh
Bindu Rajesh
Roberto Gallego-Pinazo
Rosa Dolz Marco
Dhanya V. Nair
Unni Nair
Jay Chhablani
author_facet Vishal Govindahari
Sumit Randhir Singh
Bindu Rajesh
Roberto Gallego-Pinazo
Rosa Dolz Marco
Dhanya V. Nair
Unni Nair
Jay Chhablani
author_sort Vishal Govindahari
title Multicolor imaging in central serous chorioretinopathy – a quantitative and qualitative comparison with fundus autofluorescence
title_short Multicolor imaging in central serous chorioretinopathy – a quantitative and qualitative comparison with fundus autofluorescence
title_full Multicolor imaging in central serous chorioretinopathy – a quantitative and qualitative comparison with fundus autofluorescence
title_fullStr Multicolor imaging in central serous chorioretinopathy – a quantitative and qualitative comparison with fundus autofluorescence
title_full_unstemmed Multicolor imaging in central serous chorioretinopathy – a quantitative and qualitative comparison with fundus autofluorescence
title_sort multicolor imaging in central serous chorioretinopathy – a quantitative and qualitative comparison with fundus autofluorescence
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/1341c2ce7b144b6793ba223c69e49deb
work_keys_str_mv AT vishalgovindahari multicolorimagingincentralserouschorioretinopathyaquantitativeandqualitativecomparisonwithfundusautofluorescence
AT sumitrandhirsingh multicolorimagingincentralserouschorioretinopathyaquantitativeandqualitativecomparisonwithfundusautofluorescence
AT bindurajesh multicolorimagingincentralserouschorioretinopathyaquantitativeandqualitativecomparisonwithfundusautofluorescence
AT robertogallegopinazo multicolorimagingincentralserouschorioretinopathyaquantitativeandqualitativecomparisonwithfundusautofluorescence
AT rosadolzmarco multicolorimagingincentralserouschorioretinopathyaquantitativeandqualitativecomparisonwithfundusautofluorescence
AT dhanyavnair multicolorimagingincentralserouschorioretinopathyaquantitativeandqualitativecomparisonwithfundusautofluorescence
AT unninair multicolorimagingincentralserouschorioretinopathyaquantitativeandqualitativecomparisonwithfundusautofluorescence
AT jaychhablani multicolorimagingincentralserouschorioretinopathyaquantitativeandqualitativecomparisonwithfundusautofluorescence
_version_ 1718384454320259072