Conditionals in Jóola Eegimaa: A descriptive analysis

The present study documents and analyzes conditional constructions in Jóola Eegimaa (Eegimaa, henceforth). On the surface, Eegimaa has morphemes which denote conditionality. However, these morphemes, me and éni, do not exclusively mark conditional clauses. They are also found in various other subord...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Mamadou Bassene
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FR
Publicado: LibraryPress@UF 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/1343627beb86491e9790dc5dbe5a0773
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:1343627beb86491e9790dc5dbe5a0773
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:1343627beb86491e9790dc5dbe5a07732021-11-19T03:52:05ZConditionals in Jóola Eegimaa: A descriptive analysis10.32473/sal.v46i1.1072450039-35332154-428Xhttps://doaj.org/article/1343627beb86491e9790dc5dbe5a07732017-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.flvc.org/sal/article/view/107245https://doaj.org/toc/0039-3533https://doaj.org/toc/2154-428XThe present study documents and analyzes conditional constructions in Jóola Eegimaa (Eegimaa, henceforth). On the surface, Eegimaa has morphemes which denote conditionality. However, these morphemes, me and éni, do not exclusively mark conditional clauses. They are also found in various other subordinate constructions where they introduce various clauses. The heart of my argument is that in Eegimaa, intonation is the most reliable indicator of conditionality. The data has clearly shown that the morphemes me and éni can be omitted in conditional constructions. The analysis has revealed two shared acoustic features between morphologically marked conditional sentences and those conditional sentences which do not contain any conditional morphemes. These features are (1) an intonation break separating the antecedent from the consequent, and (2) the antecedent consistently ending with a falling pitch.Mamadou BasseneLibraryPress@UFarticleconditionalEegimaaNiger-CongoPhilology. LinguisticsP1-1091ENFRStudies in African Linguistics, Vol 46, Iss 1 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FR
topic conditional
Eegimaa
Niger-Congo
Philology. Linguistics
P1-1091
spellingShingle conditional
Eegimaa
Niger-Congo
Philology. Linguistics
P1-1091
Mamadou Bassene
Conditionals in Jóola Eegimaa: A descriptive analysis
description The present study documents and analyzes conditional constructions in Jóola Eegimaa (Eegimaa, henceforth). On the surface, Eegimaa has morphemes which denote conditionality. However, these morphemes, me and éni, do not exclusively mark conditional clauses. They are also found in various other subordinate constructions where they introduce various clauses. The heart of my argument is that in Eegimaa, intonation is the most reliable indicator of conditionality. The data has clearly shown that the morphemes me and éni can be omitted in conditional constructions. The analysis has revealed two shared acoustic features between morphologically marked conditional sentences and those conditional sentences which do not contain any conditional morphemes. These features are (1) an intonation break separating the antecedent from the consequent, and (2) the antecedent consistently ending with a falling pitch.
format article
author Mamadou Bassene
author_facet Mamadou Bassene
author_sort Mamadou Bassene
title Conditionals in Jóola Eegimaa: A descriptive analysis
title_short Conditionals in Jóola Eegimaa: A descriptive analysis
title_full Conditionals in Jóola Eegimaa: A descriptive analysis
title_fullStr Conditionals in Jóola Eegimaa: A descriptive analysis
title_full_unstemmed Conditionals in Jóola Eegimaa: A descriptive analysis
title_sort conditionals in jóola eegimaa: a descriptive analysis
publisher LibraryPress@UF
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/1343627beb86491e9790dc5dbe5a0773
work_keys_str_mv AT mamadoubassene conditionalsinjoolaeegimaaadescriptiveanalysis
_version_ 1718420594004852736