Validating the Dosimetric Parameters of INTRABEAM Intraoperative Radiotherapy Machine

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: One of the methods for treating breast cancer is radiotherapy using low-kV X-rays in which a dedicated device called INTRABEAM is used along with a few spherical applicators for breast radiation. Due to the single-session nature of this treatment, evaluating the accuracy of...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: HR Baghani, Zh Ghorbani, ME Akbari
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FA
Publicado: Babol University of Medical Sciences 2019
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/13453f9c79964b5bb75e096d92bb1764
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:13453f9c79964b5bb75e096d92bb1764
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:13453f9c79964b5bb75e096d92bb17642021-11-10T08:30:36ZValidating the Dosimetric Parameters of INTRABEAM Intraoperative Radiotherapy Machine1561-41072251-7170https://doaj.org/article/13453f9c79964b5bb75e096d92bb17642019-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://jbums.org/article-1-8324-en.htmlhttps://doaj.org/toc/1561-4107https://doaj.org/toc/2251-7170BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: One of the methods for treating breast cancer is radiotherapy using low-kV X-rays in which a dedicated device called INTRABEAM is used along with a few spherical applicators for breast radiation. Due to the single-session nature of this treatment, evaluating the accuracy of the device used for treatment is essential. The aim of this study was to evaluate the dosimetric parameters of the INTRABEAM system with spherical applicators and validate the reported results for clinical use in intraoperative radiotherapy for breast tumors. METHODS: In this study, dosimetric parameters including percentage depth dose curve (PDD), transfer function (TF) and anisotropy were determined by MCNPX Monte Carlo Simulation Tool and practical dosimetry was done by Gafchromic EBT2 film. The results were quantitatively compared with the results reported by manufacturer of the device (Carl Zeiss) to evaluate the accuracy of the reported data for this treatment system.   FINDINGS: The mean difference when comparing PDD curves was 1.7% and the mean difference between the compared TF values was about 2%. The anisotropy values obtained by Monte Carlo Simulation and Gafchromic EBT2 film were also within the range recommended by the manufacturer.  CONCLUSION: Based on the results, it can be concluded that the dosimetric parameters reported by the manufacturer for spherical applicators of the INTRABEAM system are valid for designing the treatment and radiotherapy for patients.HR BaghaniZh GhorbaniME AkbariBabol University of Medical Sciencesarticlebreast cancerintraoperative radiotherapylow-kv x-raysmonte carlo simulationdosimetryMedicineRMedicine (General)R5-920ENFAMajallah-i Dānishgāh-i ̒Ulūm-i Pizishkī-i Bābul, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 174-180 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FA
topic breast cancer
intraoperative radiotherapy
low-kv x-rays
monte carlo simulation
dosimetry
Medicine
R
Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle breast cancer
intraoperative radiotherapy
low-kv x-rays
monte carlo simulation
dosimetry
Medicine
R
Medicine (General)
R5-920
HR Baghani
Zh Ghorbani
ME Akbari
Validating the Dosimetric Parameters of INTRABEAM Intraoperative Radiotherapy Machine
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: One of the methods for treating breast cancer is radiotherapy using low-kV X-rays in which a dedicated device called INTRABEAM is used along with a few spherical applicators for breast radiation. Due to the single-session nature of this treatment, evaluating the accuracy of the device used for treatment is essential. The aim of this study was to evaluate the dosimetric parameters of the INTRABEAM system with spherical applicators and validate the reported results for clinical use in intraoperative radiotherapy for breast tumors. METHODS: In this study, dosimetric parameters including percentage depth dose curve (PDD), transfer function (TF) and anisotropy were determined by MCNPX Monte Carlo Simulation Tool and practical dosimetry was done by Gafchromic EBT2 film. The results were quantitatively compared with the results reported by manufacturer of the device (Carl Zeiss) to evaluate the accuracy of the reported data for this treatment system.   FINDINGS: The mean difference when comparing PDD curves was 1.7% and the mean difference between the compared TF values was about 2%. The anisotropy values obtained by Monte Carlo Simulation and Gafchromic EBT2 film were also within the range recommended by the manufacturer.  CONCLUSION: Based on the results, it can be concluded that the dosimetric parameters reported by the manufacturer for spherical applicators of the INTRABEAM system are valid for designing the treatment and radiotherapy for patients.
format article
author HR Baghani
Zh Ghorbani
ME Akbari
author_facet HR Baghani
Zh Ghorbani
ME Akbari
author_sort HR Baghani
title Validating the Dosimetric Parameters of INTRABEAM Intraoperative Radiotherapy Machine
title_short Validating the Dosimetric Parameters of INTRABEAM Intraoperative Radiotherapy Machine
title_full Validating the Dosimetric Parameters of INTRABEAM Intraoperative Radiotherapy Machine
title_fullStr Validating the Dosimetric Parameters of INTRABEAM Intraoperative Radiotherapy Machine
title_full_unstemmed Validating the Dosimetric Parameters of INTRABEAM Intraoperative Radiotherapy Machine
title_sort validating the dosimetric parameters of intrabeam intraoperative radiotherapy machine
publisher Babol University of Medical Sciences
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/13453f9c79964b5bb75e096d92bb1764
work_keys_str_mv AT hrbaghani validatingthedosimetricparametersofintrabeamintraoperativeradiotherapymachine
AT zhghorbani validatingthedosimetricparametersofintrabeamintraoperativeradiotherapymachine
AT meakbari validatingthedosimetricparametersofintrabeamintraoperativeradiotherapymachine
_version_ 1718440350201151488