Pink esthetic and radiological scores around immediate implants placed in the esthetic zone – Socket-Shield Technique versus Immediate Conventional Technique: A Pilot Study

Objective: It is irrefutable that the extraction of teeth inextricably results in definitive changes in the surrounding hard and soft tissues. Recently, Socket-Shield Technique (SST) has been used to keep the buccal two-third of the root intact in the socket. This buccal shield further preserves the...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Payal Rajender Kumar, Jay Vikram, Udatta Kher, Ali Tunkiwala, Hemant Sawhney
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021
Materias:	alveolar bone preservation extraction socket implant esthetics socket-shield technique Dentistry RK1-715
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/135e25bd24214bdfadd07d80109507af
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:135e25bd24214bdfadd07d80109507af
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:135e25bd24214bdfadd07d80109507af2021-11-12T10:23:42ZPink esthetic and radiological scores around immediate implants placed in the esthetic zone – Socket-Shield Technique versus Immediate Conventional Technique: A Pilot Study0972-124X10.4103/jisp.jisp_278_20https://doaj.org/article/135e25bd24214bdfadd07d80109507af2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.jisponline.com/article.asp?issn=0972-124X;year=2021;volume=25;issue=6;spage=510;epage=517;aulast=Kumarhttps://doaj.org/toc/0972-124XObjective: It is irrefutable that the extraction of teeth inextricably results in definitive changes in the surrounding hard and soft tissues. Recently, Socket-Shield Technique (SST) has been used to keep the buccal two-third of the root intact in the socket. This buccal shield further preserves the periodontium-bundle bone complex and hence preserves the buccal hard and soft tissue. The purpose of the study was to do a statistical comparative analysis of two different types of flapless and graftless techniques using the esthetic (Pink Esthetic Index) and radiological parameters. Materials and Methods: A total of thirty nonrestorable tooth/root stumps (vital or nonvital) were selected and randomly allocated to two different groups: control group with immediate conventional implant placement (without SST) (Group C, n = 15) and test group with immediate implant placement using SST (Group S, n = 15). All of the sites received immediate chairside temporaries. All implants were restored either with screw- or cement-retained prostheses 4 months postoperative. Each control and test group was analyzed at two different durations: 15 days after placement of provisional and 15 days after placement of definitive prosthesis. Five parameters of Pink Esthetic Score (PES) were used for esthetic analysis, and digital periapical radiographs were used for radiographic analysis. Results: Within the time frame of the study (15 days postplacement of definitive prosthesis), a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) was observed between PES of the two techniques. Test group S (mean = 9.07) showed better scores than control group C (mean = 6.87). It was observed that buccal bone was maintained in all the cases of test group S while there was loss of buccal bone in almost all the cases of control group C. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this short-term pilot study, better soft-tissue parameters were observed with SST as compared to a conventional graftless technique whenever a restoration on immediate implant placement is considered.Payal Rajender KumarJay VikramUdatta KherAli TunkiwalaHemant SawhneyWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsarticlealveolar bone preservationextraction socketimplant estheticssocket-shield techniqueDentistryRK1-715ENJournal of Indian Society of Periodontology, Vol 25, Iss 6, Pp 510-517 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	alveolar bone preservation extraction socket implant esthetics socket-shield technique Dentistry RK1-715
spellingShingle	alveolar bone preservation extraction socket implant esthetics socket-shield technique Dentistry RK1-715 Payal Rajender Kumar Jay Vikram Udatta Kher Ali Tunkiwala Hemant Sawhney Pink esthetic and radiological scores around immediate implants placed in the esthetic zone – Socket-Shield Technique versus Immediate Conventional Technique: A Pilot Study
description	Objective: It is irrefutable that the extraction of teeth inextricably results in definitive changes in the surrounding hard and soft tissues. Recently, Socket-Shield Technique (SST) has been used to keep the buccal two-third of the root intact in the socket. This buccal shield further preserves the periodontium-bundle bone complex and hence preserves the buccal hard and soft tissue. The purpose of the study was to do a statistical comparative analysis of two different types of flapless and graftless techniques using the esthetic (Pink Esthetic Index) and radiological parameters. Materials and Methods: A total of thirty nonrestorable tooth/root stumps (vital or nonvital) were selected and randomly allocated to two different groups: control group with immediate conventional implant placement (without SST) (Group C, n = 15) and test group with immediate implant placement using SST (Group S, n = 15). All of the sites received immediate chairside temporaries. All implants were restored either with screw- or cement-retained prostheses 4 months postoperative. Each control and test group was analyzed at two different durations: 15 days after placement of provisional and 15 days after placement of definitive prosthesis. Five parameters of Pink Esthetic Score (PES) were used for esthetic analysis, and digital periapical radiographs were used for radiographic analysis. Results: Within the time frame of the study (15 days postplacement of definitive prosthesis), a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) was observed between PES of the two techniques. Test group S (mean = 9.07) showed better scores than control group C (mean = 6.87). It was observed that buccal bone was maintained in all the cases of test group S while there was loss of buccal bone in almost all the cases of control group C. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this short-term pilot study, better soft-tissue parameters were observed with SST as compared to a conventional graftless technique whenever a restoration on immediate implant placement is considered.
format	article
author	Payal Rajender Kumar Jay Vikram Udatta Kher Ali Tunkiwala Hemant Sawhney
author_facet	Payal Rajender Kumar Jay Vikram Udatta Kher Ali Tunkiwala Hemant Sawhney
author_sort	Payal Rajender Kumar
title	Pink esthetic and radiological scores around immediate implants placed in the esthetic zone – Socket-Shield Technique versus Immediate Conventional Technique: A Pilot Study
title_short	Pink esthetic and radiological scores around immediate implants placed in the esthetic zone – Socket-Shield Technique versus Immediate Conventional Technique: A Pilot Study
title_full	Pink esthetic and radiological scores around immediate implants placed in the esthetic zone – Socket-Shield Technique versus Immediate Conventional Technique: A Pilot Study
title_fullStr	Pink esthetic and radiological scores around immediate implants placed in the esthetic zone – Socket-Shield Technique versus Immediate Conventional Technique: A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed	Pink esthetic and radiological scores around immediate implants placed in the esthetic zone – Socket-Shield Technique versus Immediate Conventional Technique: A Pilot Study
title_sort	pink esthetic and radiological scores around immediate implants placed in the esthetic zone – socket-shield technique versus immediate conventional technique: a pilot study
publisher	Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/135e25bd24214bdfadd07d80109507af
work_keys_str_mv	AT payalrajenderkumar pinkestheticandradiologicalscoresaroundimmediateimplantsplacedintheestheticzonesocketshieldtechniqueversusimmediateconventionaltechniqueapilotstudy AT jayvikram pinkestheticandradiologicalscoresaroundimmediateimplantsplacedintheestheticzonesocketshieldtechniqueversusimmediateconventionaltechniqueapilotstudy AT udattakher pinkestheticandradiologicalscoresaroundimmediateimplantsplacedintheestheticzonesocketshieldtechniqueversusimmediateconventionaltechniqueapilotstudy AT alitunkiwala pinkestheticandradiologicalscoresaroundimmediateimplantsplacedintheestheticzonesocketshieldtechniqueversusimmediateconventionaltechniqueapilotstudy AT hemantsawhney pinkestheticandradiologicalscoresaroundimmediateimplantsplacedintheestheticzonesocketshieldtechniqueversusimmediateconventionaltechniqueapilotstudy
_version_	1718430973371088896

Pink esthetic and radiological scores around immediate implants placed in the esthetic zone – Socket-Shield Technique versus Immediate Conventional Technique: A Pilot Study

Ejemplares similares