Assessment of Non-invasive Markers for the Prediction of Esophageal Variceal Hemorrhage

Background: Esophageal variceal (EV) hemorrhage is a life-threatening consequence of portal hypertension in cirrhotic patients. Screening upper endoscopy and endoscopic variceal ligation to identify and treat EVs have contraindications, complications, and high costs. We sought to identify non-invasi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shasha Li, Peng Huang, Andre J. Jeyarajan, Chao Ma, Ke Zhu, Chuanlong Zhu, Ning Jiang, Ming Li, Tuo Shao, Mingfeng Han, Lin Tan, Wenyu Lin
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/138c8fddc2da498d98576b9ad9f78fc9
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:138c8fddc2da498d98576b9ad9f78fc9
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:138c8fddc2da498d98576b9ad9f78fc92021-12-02T00:28:29ZAssessment of Non-invasive Markers for the Prediction of Esophageal Variceal Hemorrhage2296-858X10.3389/fmed.2021.770836https://doaj.org/article/138c8fddc2da498d98576b9ad9f78fc92021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2021.770836/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2296-858XBackground: Esophageal variceal (EV) hemorrhage is a life-threatening consequence of portal hypertension in cirrhotic patients. Screening upper endoscopy and endoscopic variceal ligation to identify and treat EVs have contraindications, complications, and high costs. We sought to identify non-invasive tests (NITs) as alternatives to endoscopic EV screening.Methods: In this case-control study, we retrospectively analyzed 286 cirrhotic patients treated for EVs at the Second People's Hospital of Fuyang City, China from January to December 2019. We applied ROC curve analysis to assess the accuracy of various NITs in predicting EV hemorrhage.Results: There were significant differences between the hemorrhage and non-hemorrhage groups in median serum albumin (ALB) (p < 0.001), median bilirubin (TBIL) (p < 0.046), prothrombin (PT) time (p < 0.001), Golgi protein 73 (GP73; p = 0.012) and Child-Pugh (C-P) scores (p < 0.001). For ALB (cutoff <33.2g/L), PT time (cutoff > 14.2 seconds), GP73 (cutoff > 126.4 ng/ml), and C-P scores, the areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) were 73.4% (95% CI: 67.5–79.2), 68.6% (95% CI: 62.4–74.8), 62.2% (95% CI: 52.8–71.5) and 69.8% (95%CI: 63.8–75.8), respectively, with corresponding sensitives of 71.5, 59.8, 69.8, and 92.2% and specificities of 65.6%, 70.1%, 56.5%, and 38.6%. When ALB was combined with GP73, the AUC was 74.3% (95% CI: 66.1–82.5) with a sensitivity of 65.1% and specificity of 76.5%. When ALB, PT, and C-P scores were combined, the AUC was 76.5% (95% CI: 70.9–82.1) with a sensitivity of 79.5% and specificity of 64.3%. When ALB, PT, GP73, and C-P scores were combined, the AUC was 75.2% (95% CI: 67.3–83.1) with a sensitivity of 54.0% and specificity of 86.9%.Conclusion: ALB, TBIL, GP73, and C-P scores, may be used to predict EV hemorrhage in cirrhotic patients. The combination of multiple NITs is better than a single index and can increase diagnostic performance.Shasha LiPeng HuangPeng HuangAndre J. JeyarajanChao MaKe ZhuChuanlong ZhuNing JiangMing LiTuo ShaoMingfeng HanLin TanWenyu LinFrontiers Media S.A.articleesophageal varices (EVs)liver fibrosishemorrhageGolgi protein 73 (GP73)population cohort studyMedicine (General)R5-920ENFrontiers in Medicine, Vol 8 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic esophageal varices (EVs)
liver fibrosis
hemorrhage
Golgi protein 73 (GP73)
population cohort study
Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle esophageal varices (EVs)
liver fibrosis
hemorrhage
Golgi protein 73 (GP73)
population cohort study
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Shasha Li
Peng Huang
Peng Huang
Andre J. Jeyarajan
Chao Ma
Ke Zhu
Chuanlong Zhu
Ning Jiang
Ming Li
Tuo Shao
Mingfeng Han
Lin Tan
Wenyu Lin
Assessment of Non-invasive Markers for the Prediction of Esophageal Variceal Hemorrhage
description Background: Esophageal variceal (EV) hemorrhage is a life-threatening consequence of portal hypertension in cirrhotic patients. Screening upper endoscopy and endoscopic variceal ligation to identify and treat EVs have contraindications, complications, and high costs. We sought to identify non-invasive tests (NITs) as alternatives to endoscopic EV screening.Methods: In this case-control study, we retrospectively analyzed 286 cirrhotic patients treated for EVs at the Second People's Hospital of Fuyang City, China from January to December 2019. We applied ROC curve analysis to assess the accuracy of various NITs in predicting EV hemorrhage.Results: There were significant differences between the hemorrhage and non-hemorrhage groups in median serum albumin (ALB) (p < 0.001), median bilirubin (TBIL) (p < 0.046), prothrombin (PT) time (p < 0.001), Golgi protein 73 (GP73; p = 0.012) and Child-Pugh (C-P) scores (p < 0.001). For ALB (cutoff <33.2g/L), PT time (cutoff > 14.2 seconds), GP73 (cutoff > 126.4 ng/ml), and C-P scores, the areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) were 73.4% (95% CI: 67.5–79.2), 68.6% (95% CI: 62.4–74.8), 62.2% (95% CI: 52.8–71.5) and 69.8% (95%CI: 63.8–75.8), respectively, with corresponding sensitives of 71.5, 59.8, 69.8, and 92.2% and specificities of 65.6%, 70.1%, 56.5%, and 38.6%. When ALB was combined with GP73, the AUC was 74.3% (95% CI: 66.1–82.5) with a sensitivity of 65.1% and specificity of 76.5%. When ALB, PT, and C-P scores were combined, the AUC was 76.5% (95% CI: 70.9–82.1) with a sensitivity of 79.5% and specificity of 64.3%. When ALB, PT, GP73, and C-P scores were combined, the AUC was 75.2% (95% CI: 67.3–83.1) with a sensitivity of 54.0% and specificity of 86.9%.Conclusion: ALB, TBIL, GP73, and C-P scores, may be used to predict EV hemorrhage in cirrhotic patients. The combination of multiple NITs is better than a single index and can increase diagnostic performance.
format article
author Shasha Li
Peng Huang
Peng Huang
Andre J. Jeyarajan
Chao Ma
Ke Zhu
Chuanlong Zhu
Ning Jiang
Ming Li
Tuo Shao
Mingfeng Han
Lin Tan
Wenyu Lin
author_facet Shasha Li
Peng Huang
Peng Huang
Andre J. Jeyarajan
Chao Ma
Ke Zhu
Chuanlong Zhu
Ning Jiang
Ming Li
Tuo Shao
Mingfeng Han
Lin Tan
Wenyu Lin
author_sort Shasha Li
title Assessment of Non-invasive Markers for the Prediction of Esophageal Variceal Hemorrhage
title_short Assessment of Non-invasive Markers for the Prediction of Esophageal Variceal Hemorrhage
title_full Assessment of Non-invasive Markers for the Prediction of Esophageal Variceal Hemorrhage
title_fullStr Assessment of Non-invasive Markers for the Prediction of Esophageal Variceal Hemorrhage
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Non-invasive Markers for the Prediction of Esophageal Variceal Hemorrhage
title_sort assessment of non-invasive markers for the prediction of esophageal variceal hemorrhage
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/138c8fddc2da498d98576b9ad9f78fc9
work_keys_str_mv AT shashali assessmentofnoninvasivemarkersforthepredictionofesophagealvaricealhemorrhage
AT penghuang assessmentofnoninvasivemarkersforthepredictionofesophagealvaricealhemorrhage
AT penghuang assessmentofnoninvasivemarkersforthepredictionofesophagealvaricealhemorrhage
AT andrejjeyarajan assessmentofnoninvasivemarkersforthepredictionofesophagealvaricealhemorrhage
AT chaoma assessmentofnoninvasivemarkersforthepredictionofesophagealvaricealhemorrhage
AT kezhu assessmentofnoninvasivemarkersforthepredictionofesophagealvaricealhemorrhage
AT chuanlongzhu assessmentofnoninvasivemarkersforthepredictionofesophagealvaricealhemorrhage
AT ningjiang assessmentofnoninvasivemarkersforthepredictionofesophagealvaricealhemorrhage
AT mingli assessmentofnoninvasivemarkersforthepredictionofesophagealvaricealhemorrhage
AT tuoshao assessmentofnoninvasivemarkersforthepredictionofesophagealvaricealhemorrhage
AT mingfenghan assessmentofnoninvasivemarkersforthepredictionofesophagealvaricealhemorrhage
AT lintan assessmentofnoninvasivemarkersforthepredictionofesophagealvaricealhemorrhage
AT wenyulin assessmentofnoninvasivemarkersforthepredictionofesophagealvaricealhemorrhage
_version_ 1718403659840094208