Archive as Catastrophe

This article proposes a radical take on what an archive should be: catastrophe, the overturning of property. By way of James Clifford, Roland Barthes, Susan Sontag, Walter Benjamin, Clarice Lispector, Jorge Luis Borges, and Cildo Meireles, we seek to pinpoint the conceptual difference between a coll...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Caio Yurgel
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
IT
Publicado: Globus et Locus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/13a61cec9ec34ccbb13fd28caba3c3ef
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:13a61cec9ec34ccbb13fd28caba3c3ef
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:13a61cec9ec34ccbb13fd28caba3c3ef2021-11-11T10:53:02ZArchive as Catastrophe10.12893/gjcpi.2021.2.52283-7949https://doaj.org/article/13a61cec9ec34ccbb13fd28caba3c3ef2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://glocalismjournal.org/archive-as-catastrophe/https://doaj.org/toc/2283-7949This article proposes a radical take on what an archive should be: catastrophe, the overturning of property. By way of James Clifford, Roland Barthes, Susan Sontag, Walter Benjamin, Clarice Lispector, Jorge Luis Borges, and Cildo Meireles, we seek to pinpoint the conceptual difference between a collection and an archive, positing that what makes an archive radical is precisely the fact it is not a collection. A collection is concerned with the accumulation of property and the preservation of the status quo. It is an aspirational – or, to use Benjamin’s words, bourgeois – endeavor: it seeks to protect and preserve itself. An archive, on the other hand, is catastrophic: it should disturb – the archivist most of all. We understand archive here not as an institutional practice, but as an intellectual and artistic method. An archive asks of the archivist: What are you going to do with this? The archive asks the defining question of our capitalist age: why are you accumulating property? Caio YurgelGlobus et LocusarticlearchivearbitrarinessaccumulationpropertyteleologySocial sciences (General)H1-99ENITGlocalism: Journal of Culture, Politics and Innovation, Vol 2021, Iss 2 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
IT
topic archive
arbitrariness
accumulation
property
teleology
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
spellingShingle archive
arbitrariness
accumulation
property
teleology
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
Caio Yurgel
Archive as Catastrophe
description This article proposes a radical take on what an archive should be: catastrophe, the overturning of property. By way of James Clifford, Roland Barthes, Susan Sontag, Walter Benjamin, Clarice Lispector, Jorge Luis Borges, and Cildo Meireles, we seek to pinpoint the conceptual difference between a collection and an archive, positing that what makes an archive radical is precisely the fact it is not a collection. A collection is concerned with the accumulation of property and the preservation of the status quo. It is an aspirational – or, to use Benjamin’s words, bourgeois – endeavor: it seeks to protect and preserve itself. An archive, on the other hand, is catastrophic: it should disturb – the archivist most of all. We understand archive here not as an institutional practice, but as an intellectual and artistic method. An archive asks of the archivist: What are you going to do with this? The archive asks the defining question of our capitalist age: why are you accumulating property?
format article
author Caio Yurgel
author_facet Caio Yurgel
author_sort Caio Yurgel
title Archive as Catastrophe
title_short Archive as Catastrophe
title_full Archive as Catastrophe
title_fullStr Archive as Catastrophe
title_full_unstemmed Archive as Catastrophe
title_sort archive as catastrophe
publisher Globus et Locus
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/13a61cec9ec34ccbb13fd28caba3c3ef
work_keys_str_mv AT caioyurgel archiveascatastrophe
_version_ 1718439103263932416