How Behavior of Nontarget Species Affects Perceived Accuracy of Scat Detection Dog Surveys

Abstract Detection dogs, specially trained domestic dogs (Canis familiaris), have become a valuable, noninvasive, conservation tool because they remove the dependence of attracting species to a particular location. Further, detection dogs locate samples independent of appearance, composition, or vis...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karen E. DeMatteo, Linsey W. Blake, Julie K. Young, Barbara Davenport
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2018
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/14e296f486164d859b64f46c674fb64e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:14e296f486164d859b64f46c674fb64e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:14e296f486164d859b64f46c674fb64e2021-12-02T15:09:03ZHow Behavior of Nontarget Species Affects Perceived Accuracy of Scat Detection Dog Surveys10.1038/s41598-018-32244-12045-2322https://doaj.org/article/14e296f486164d859b64f46c674fb64e2018-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32244-1https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Detection dogs, specially trained domestic dogs (Canis familiaris), have become a valuable, noninvasive, conservation tool because they remove the dependence of attracting species to a particular location. Further, detection dogs locate samples independent of appearance, composition, or visibility allowing researchers to collect large sets of unbiased samples that can be used in complex ecological queries. One question not fully addressed is why samples from nontarget species are inadvertently collected during detection dog surveys. While a common explanation has been incomplete handler or dog training, our study aimed to explore alternative explanations. Our trials demonstrate that a scat’s genetic profile can be altered by interactions of nontarget species with target scat via urine-marking, coprophagy, and moving scats with their mouths, all pathways to contamination by nontarget species’ DNA. Because detection dogs are trained to locate odor independent of masking, the collection of samples with a mixed olfactory profile (target and nontarget) is possible. These scats will likely have characteristics of target species’ scats and are therefore only discovered faulty once genetic results indicate a nontarget species. While the collection of nontarget scats will not impact research conclusions so long as samples are DNA tested, we suggest ways to minimize their collection and associated costs.Karen E. DeMatteoLinsey W. BlakeJulie K. YoungBarbara DavenportNature PortfolioarticleDetection DogsTarget ScatCoprophagyDomestic DogsUrinary MarkersMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2018)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Detection Dogs
Target Scat
Coprophagy
Domestic Dogs
Urinary Markers
Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Detection Dogs
Target Scat
Coprophagy
Domestic Dogs
Urinary Markers
Medicine
R
Science
Q
Karen E. DeMatteo
Linsey W. Blake
Julie K. Young
Barbara Davenport
How Behavior of Nontarget Species Affects Perceived Accuracy of Scat Detection Dog Surveys
description Abstract Detection dogs, specially trained domestic dogs (Canis familiaris), have become a valuable, noninvasive, conservation tool because they remove the dependence of attracting species to a particular location. Further, detection dogs locate samples independent of appearance, composition, or visibility allowing researchers to collect large sets of unbiased samples that can be used in complex ecological queries. One question not fully addressed is why samples from nontarget species are inadvertently collected during detection dog surveys. While a common explanation has been incomplete handler or dog training, our study aimed to explore alternative explanations. Our trials demonstrate that a scat’s genetic profile can be altered by interactions of nontarget species with target scat via urine-marking, coprophagy, and moving scats with their mouths, all pathways to contamination by nontarget species’ DNA. Because detection dogs are trained to locate odor independent of masking, the collection of samples with a mixed olfactory profile (target and nontarget) is possible. These scats will likely have characteristics of target species’ scats and are therefore only discovered faulty once genetic results indicate a nontarget species. While the collection of nontarget scats will not impact research conclusions so long as samples are DNA tested, we suggest ways to minimize their collection and associated costs.
format article
author Karen E. DeMatteo
Linsey W. Blake
Julie K. Young
Barbara Davenport
author_facet Karen E. DeMatteo
Linsey W. Blake
Julie K. Young
Barbara Davenport
author_sort Karen E. DeMatteo
title How Behavior of Nontarget Species Affects Perceived Accuracy of Scat Detection Dog Surveys
title_short How Behavior of Nontarget Species Affects Perceived Accuracy of Scat Detection Dog Surveys
title_full How Behavior of Nontarget Species Affects Perceived Accuracy of Scat Detection Dog Surveys
title_fullStr How Behavior of Nontarget Species Affects Perceived Accuracy of Scat Detection Dog Surveys
title_full_unstemmed How Behavior of Nontarget Species Affects Perceived Accuracy of Scat Detection Dog Surveys
title_sort how behavior of nontarget species affects perceived accuracy of scat detection dog surveys
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/14e296f486164d859b64f46c674fb64e
work_keys_str_mv AT karenedematteo howbehaviorofnontargetspeciesaffectsperceivedaccuracyofscatdetectiondogsurveys
AT linseywblake howbehaviorofnontargetspeciesaffectsperceivedaccuracyofscatdetectiondogsurveys
AT juliekyoung howbehaviorofnontargetspeciesaffectsperceivedaccuracyofscatdetectiondogsurveys
AT barbaradavenport howbehaviorofnontargetspeciesaffectsperceivedaccuracyofscatdetectiondogsurveys
_version_ 1718387921862524928