Prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Validation and ranking of established staging-systems in a large western HCC-cohort.
<h4>Background</h4>HCC is diagnosed in approximately half a million people per year, worldwide. Staging is a more complex issue than in most other cancer entities and, mainly due to unique geographic characteristics of the disease, no universally accepted staging system exists to date. F...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2012
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/14e5c8d6585c4222a602382a08c0abd1 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:14e5c8d6585c4222a602382a08c0abd1 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:14e5c8d6585c4222a602382a08c0abd12021-11-18T08:13:08ZPrognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Validation and ranking of established staging-systems in a large western HCC-cohort.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0045066https://doaj.org/article/14e5c8d6585c4222a602382a08c0abd12012-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/23071507/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>HCC is diagnosed in approximately half a million people per year, worldwide. Staging is a more complex issue than in most other cancer entities and, mainly due to unique geographic characteristics of the disease, no universally accepted staging system exists to date. Focusing on survival rates we analyzed demographic, etiological, clinical, laboratory and tumor characteristics of HCC-patients in our institution and applied the common staging systems. Furthermore we aimed at identifying the most suitable of the current staging systems for predicting survival.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>Overall, 405 patients with HCC were identified from an electronic medical record database. The following seven staging systems were applied and ranked according to their ability to predict survival by using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the concordance-index (c-index): BCLC, CLIP, GETCH, JIS, Okuda, TNM and Child-Pugh. Separately, every single variable of each staging system was tested for prognostic meaning in uni- and multivariate analysis. Alcoholic cirrhosis (44.4%) was the leading etiological factor followed by viral hepatitis C (18.8%). Median survival was 18.1 months (95%-CI: 15.2-22.2). Ascites, bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, AFP, number of tumor nodes and the BCLC tumor extension remained independent prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. Overall, all of the tested staging systems showed a reasonable discriminatory ability. CLIP (closely followed by JIS) was the top-ranked score in terms of prognostic capability with the best values of the AIC and c-index (AIC 2286, c-index 0.71), surpassing other established staging systems like BCLC (AIC 2343, c-index 0.66). The unidimensional scores TNM (AIC 2342, c-index 0.64) and Child-Pugh (AIC 2369, c-index 0.63) performed in an inferior fashion.<h4>Conclusions/significance</h4>Compared with six other staging systems, the CLIP-score was identified as the most suitable staging system for predicting prognosis in a large German cohort of predominantly non-surgical HCC-patients.Mark op den WinkelDorothea NagelJulia SapplPhilip op den WinkelRolf LamerzChristoph J ZechGundula StraubThomas NickelMarkus RentschPetra StieberBurkhard GökeFrank T KolligsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 7, Iss 10, p e45066 (2012) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN |
| topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
| spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Mark op den Winkel Dorothea Nagel Julia Sappl Philip op den Winkel Rolf Lamerz Christoph J Zech Gundula Straub Thomas Nickel Markus Rentsch Petra Stieber Burkhard Göke Frank T Kolligs Prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Validation and ranking of established staging-systems in a large western HCC-cohort. |
| description |
<h4>Background</h4>HCC is diagnosed in approximately half a million people per year, worldwide. Staging is a more complex issue than in most other cancer entities and, mainly due to unique geographic characteristics of the disease, no universally accepted staging system exists to date. Focusing on survival rates we analyzed demographic, etiological, clinical, laboratory and tumor characteristics of HCC-patients in our institution and applied the common staging systems. Furthermore we aimed at identifying the most suitable of the current staging systems for predicting survival.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>Overall, 405 patients with HCC were identified from an electronic medical record database. The following seven staging systems were applied and ranked according to their ability to predict survival by using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the concordance-index (c-index): BCLC, CLIP, GETCH, JIS, Okuda, TNM and Child-Pugh. Separately, every single variable of each staging system was tested for prognostic meaning in uni- and multivariate analysis. Alcoholic cirrhosis (44.4%) was the leading etiological factor followed by viral hepatitis C (18.8%). Median survival was 18.1 months (95%-CI: 15.2-22.2). Ascites, bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, AFP, number of tumor nodes and the BCLC tumor extension remained independent prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. Overall, all of the tested staging systems showed a reasonable discriminatory ability. CLIP (closely followed by JIS) was the top-ranked score in terms of prognostic capability with the best values of the AIC and c-index (AIC 2286, c-index 0.71), surpassing other established staging systems like BCLC (AIC 2343, c-index 0.66). The unidimensional scores TNM (AIC 2342, c-index 0.64) and Child-Pugh (AIC 2369, c-index 0.63) performed in an inferior fashion.<h4>Conclusions/significance</h4>Compared with six other staging systems, the CLIP-score was identified as the most suitable staging system for predicting prognosis in a large German cohort of predominantly non-surgical HCC-patients. |
| format |
article |
| author |
Mark op den Winkel Dorothea Nagel Julia Sappl Philip op den Winkel Rolf Lamerz Christoph J Zech Gundula Straub Thomas Nickel Markus Rentsch Petra Stieber Burkhard Göke Frank T Kolligs |
| author_facet |
Mark op den Winkel Dorothea Nagel Julia Sappl Philip op den Winkel Rolf Lamerz Christoph J Zech Gundula Straub Thomas Nickel Markus Rentsch Petra Stieber Burkhard Göke Frank T Kolligs |
| author_sort |
Mark op den Winkel |
| title |
Prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Validation and ranking of established staging-systems in a large western HCC-cohort. |
| title_short |
Prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Validation and ranking of established staging-systems in a large western HCC-cohort. |
| title_full |
Prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Validation and ranking of established staging-systems in a large western HCC-cohort. |
| title_fullStr |
Prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Validation and ranking of established staging-systems in a large western HCC-cohort. |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Validation and ranking of established staging-systems in a large western HCC-cohort. |
| title_sort |
prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. validation and ranking of established staging-systems in a large western hcc-cohort. |
| publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| publishDate |
2012 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/14e5c8d6585c4222a602382a08c0abd1 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT markopdenwinkel prognosisofpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomavalidationandrankingofestablishedstagingsystemsinalargewesternhcccohort AT dorotheanagel prognosisofpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomavalidationandrankingofestablishedstagingsystemsinalargewesternhcccohort AT juliasappl prognosisofpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomavalidationandrankingofestablishedstagingsystemsinalargewesternhcccohort AT philipopdenwinkel prognosisofpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomavalidationandrankingofestablishedstagingsystemsinalargewesternhcccohort AT rolflamerz prognosisofpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomavalidationandrankingofestablishedstagingsystemsinalargewesternhcccohort AT christophjzech prognosisofpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomavalidationandrankingofestablishedstagingsystemsinalargewesternhcccohort AT gundulastraub prognosisofpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomavalidationandrankingofestablishedstagingsystemsinalargewesternhcccohort AT thomasnickel prognosisofpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomavalidationandrankingofestablishedstagingsystemsinalargewesternhcccohort AT markusrentsch prognosisofpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomavalidationandrankingofestablishedstagingsystemsinalargewesternhcccohort AT petrastieber prognosisofpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomavalidationandrankingofestablishedstagingsystemsinalargewesternhcccohort AT burkhardgoke prognosisofpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomavalidationandrankingofestablishedstagingsystemsinalargewesternhcccohort AT franktkolligs prognosisofpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomavalidationandrankingofestablishedstagingsystemsinalargewesternhcccohort |
| _version_ |
1718422027995447296 |