Human Rights in a Pandemic

The article is focused on the problem of human rights (HRs), limited or derogated from, due to the Covid-19 pandemic. While addressing some HRs limitations, derogations and even abuses, and their consequent problems, the aim is to try to analyze policy, social, moral and personal dilemmas of HRs res...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	A. Zhebit
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN RU
Publicado:	Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”) 2020
Materias:	pandemic human rights comparative law comparative politics hrs dilemmas and dichotomies solidarity right to equity International relations JZ2-6530
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/152bdec7904245ec973e9ee69614fdd1
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:152bdec7904245ec973e9ee69614fdd1
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:152bdec7904245ec973e9ee69614fdd12021-11-07T14:45:04ZHuman Rights in a Pandemic2542-02402587-932410.23932/2542-0240-2020-13-5-13https://doaj.org/article/152bdec7904245ec973e9ee69614fdd12020-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/693https://doaj.org/toc/2542-0240https://doaj.org/toc/2587-9324The article is focused on the problem of human rights (HRs), limited or derogated from, due to the Covid-19 pandemic. While addressing some HRs limitations, derogations and even abuses, and their consequent problems, the aim is to try to analyze policy, social, moral and personal dilemmas of HRs restrictions as well as motivations behind the types of public and social behavior, in the course of the pandemic, in response to the public measures of sanitation, social distancing and confinement, travel restrictions and social assistance, recommended by the WHO and selectively followed by governments. Learning from some old experience and deriving new lessons from the pandemic, as well as from public and social actions and reactions, the purpose of the present article is to assess whether or not public health policies in this context, implemented nationally or internationally, can promote change in the HRs paradigm in the face of the existing dilemmas and dichotomies in HRs, aggravated by the pandemic. The conclusion is that the extant HRs paradigm should be redefined to address better the political, social, economic, environmental and, especially, existential exigencies of “rainy times”, thus leading to the creation of a new universal HRs code or to harmonizing the existing one.A. ZhebitАссоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”)articlepandemichuman rightscomparative lawcomparative politicshrs dilemmas and dichotomiessolidarityright to equityInternational relationsJZ2-6530ENRUКонтуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право, Vol 13, Iss 5 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN RU
topic	pandemic human rights comparative law comparative politics hrs dilemmas and dichotomies solidarity right to equity International relations JZ2-6530
spellingShingle	pandemic human rights comparative law comparative politics hrs dilemmas and dichotomies solidarity right to equity International relations JZ2-6530 A. Zhebit Human Rights in a Pandemic
description	The article is focused on the problem of human rights (HRs), limited or derogated from, due to the Covid-19 pandemic. While addressing some HRs limitations, derogations and even abuses, and their consequent problems, the aim is to try to analyze policy, social, moral and personal dilemmas of HRs restrictions as well as motivations behind the types of public and social behavior, in the course of the pandemic, in response to the public measures of sanitation, social distancing and confinement, travel restrictions and social assistance, recommended by the WHO and selectively followed by governments. Learning from some old experience and deriving new lessons from the pandemic, as well as from public and social actions and reactions, the purpose of the present article is to assess whether or not public health policies in this context, implemented nationally or internationally, can promote change in the HRs paradigm in the face of the existing dilemmas and dichotomies in HRs, aggravated by the pandemic. The conclusion is that the extant HRs paradigm should be redefined to address better the political, social, economic, environmental and, especially, existential exigencies of “rainy times”, thus leading to the creation of a new universal HRs code or to harmonizing the existing one.
format	article
author	A. Zhebit
author_facet	A. Zhebit
author_sort	A. Zhebit
title	Human Rights in a Pandemic
title_short	Human Rights in a Pandemic
title_full	Human Rights in a Pandemic
title_fullStr	Human Rights in a Pandemic
title_full_unstemmed	Human Rights in a Pandemic
title_sort	human rights in a pandemic
publisher	Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”)
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/152bdec7904245ec973e9ee69614fdd1
work_keys_str_mv	AT azhebit humanrightsinapandemic
_version_	1718443334302695424

Human Rights in a Pandemic

Ejemplares similares