Effects of velocity based training vs. traditional 1RM percentage-based training on improving strength, jump, linear sprint and change of direction speed performance: A Systematic review with meta-analysis.

<h4>Background</h4>There has been a surge of interest on velocity-based training (VBT) in recent years. However, it remains unclear whether VBT is more effective in improving strength, jump, linear sprint and change of direction speed (CODs) than the traditional 1RM percentage-based trai...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Kai-Fang Liao, Xin-Xin Wang, Meng-Yuan Han, Lin-Long Li, George P Nassis, Yong-Ming Li
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/157aeb5bbe994a60a4e092a25d5d7e66
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:157aeb5bbe994a60a4e092a25d5d7e66
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:157aeb5bbe994a60a4e092a25d5d7e662021-12-02T20:12:48ZEffects of velocity based training vs. traditional 1RM percentage-based training on improving strength, jump, linear sprint and change of direction speed performance: A Systematic review with meta-analysis.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0259790https://doaj.org/article/157aeb5bbe994a60a4e092a25d5d7e662021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259790https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>There has been a surge of interest on velocity-based training (VBT) in recent years. However, it remains unclear whether VBT is more effective in improving strength, jump, linear sprint and change of direction speed (CODs) than the traditional 1RM percentage-based training (PBT).<h4>Objectives</h4>To compare the training effects in VBT vs. PBT upon strength, jump, linear sprint and CODs performance.<h4>Data sources</h4>Web of science, PubMed and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI).<h4>Study eligibility criteria</h4>The qualified studies for inclusion in the meta-analysis must have included a resistance training intervention that compared the effects of VBT and PBT on at least one measure of strength, jump, linear sprint and CODs with participants aged ≥16 yrs. and be written in English or Chinese.<h4>Methods</h4>The modified Pedro Scale was used to assess the risk of bias. Random-effects model was used to calculate the effects via the mean change and pre-SD (standard deviation). Mean difference (MD) or Standardized mean difference (SMD) was presented correspondently with 95% confidence interval (CI).<h4>Results</h4>Six studies met the inclusion criteria including a total of 124 participants aged 16 to 30 yrs. The differences of training effects between VBT and PBT were not significant in back squat 1RM (MD = 3.03kg; 95%CI: -3.55, 9.61; I2 = 0%) and load velocity 60%1RM (MD = 0.02m/s; 95%CI: -0.01,0.06; I2 = 0%), jump (SMD = 0.27; 95%CI: -0.15,0.7; I2 = 0%), linear sprint (MD = 0.01s; 95%CI: -0.06, 0.07; I2 = 0%), and CODs (SMD = 0.49; 95%CI: -0.14, 1.07; I2 = 0%).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Both VBT and PBT can enhance strength, jump, linear sprint and CODs performance effectively without significant group difference.Kai-Fang LiaoXin-Xin WangMeng-Yuan HanLin-Long LiGeorge P NassisYong-Ming LiPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 11, p e0259790 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Kai-Fang Liao Xin-Xin Wang Meng-Yuan Han Lin-Long Li George P Nassis Yong-Ming Li Effects of velocity based training vs. traditional 1RM percentage-based training on improving strength, jump, linear sprint and change of direction speed performance: A Systematic review with meta-analysis.
description	<h4>Background</h4>There has been a surge of interest on velocity-based training (VBT) in recent years. However, it remains unclear whether VBT is more effective in improving strength, jump, linear sprint and change of direction speed (CODs) than the traditional 1RM percentage-based training (PBT).<h4>Objectives</h4>To compare the training effects in VBT vs. PBT upon strength, jump, linear sprint and CODs performance.<h4>Data sources</h4>Web of science, PubMed and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI).<h4>Study eligibility criteria</h4>The qualified studies for inclusion in the meta-analysis must have included a resistance training intervention that compared the effects of VBT and PBT on at least one measure of strength, jump, linear sprint and CODs with participants aged ≥16 yrs. and be written in English or Chinese.<h4>Methods</h4>The modified Pedro Scale was used to assess the risk of bias. Random-effects model was used to calculate the effects via the mean change and pre-SD (standard deviation). Mean difference (MD) or Standardized mean difference (SMD) was presented correspondently with 95% confidence interval (CI).<h4>Results</h4>Six studies met the inclusion criteria including a total of 124 participants aged 16 to 30 yrs. The differences of training effects between VBT and PBT were not significant in back squat 1RM (MD = 3.03kg; 95%CI: -3.55, 9.61; I2 = 0%) and load velocity 60%1RM (MD = 0.02m/s; 95%CI: -0.01,0.06; I2 = 0%), jump (SMD = 0.27; 95%CI: -0.15,0.7; I2 = 0%), linear sprint (MD = 0.01s; 95%CI: -0.06, 0.07; I2 = 0%), and CODs (SMD = 0.49; 95%CI: -0.14, 1.07; I2 = 0%).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Both VBT and PBT can enhance strength, jump, linear sprint and CODs performance effectively without significant group difference.
format	article
author	Kai-Fang Liao Xin-Xin Wang Meng-Yuan Han Lin-Long Li George P Nassis Yong-Ming Li
author_facet	Kai-Fang Liao Xin-Xin Wang Meng-Yuan Han Lin-Long Li George P Nassis Yong-Ming Li
author_sort	Kai-Fang Liao
title	Effects of velocity based training vs. traditional 1RM percentage-based training on improving strength, jump, linear sprint and change of direction speed performance: A Systematic review with meta-analysis.
title_short	Effects of velocity based training vs. traditional 1RM percentage-based training on improving strength, jump, linear sprint and change of direction speed performance: A Systematic review with meta-analysis.
title_full	Effects of velocity based training vs. traditional 1RM percentage-based training on improving strength, jump, linear sprint and change of direction speed performance: A Systematic review with meta-analysis.
title_fullStr	Effects of velocity based training vs. traditional 1RM percentage-based training on improving strength, jump, linear sprint and change of direction speed performance: A Systematic review with meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed	Effects of velocity based training vs. traditional 1RM percentage-based training on improving strength, jump, linear sprint and change of direction speed performance: A Systematic review with meta-analysis.
title_sort	effects of velocity based training vs. traditional 1rm percentage-based training on improving strength, jump, linear sprint and change of direction speed performance: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
publisher	Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/157aeb5bbe994a60a4e092a25d5d7e66
work_keys_str_mv	AT kaifangliao effectsofvelocitybasedtrainingvstraditional1rmpercentagebasedtrainingonimprovingstrengthjumplinearsprintandchangeofdirectionspeedperformanceasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT xinxinwang effectsofvelocitybasedtrainingvstraditional1rmpercentagebasedtrainingonimprovingstrengthjumplinearsprintandchangeofdirectionspeedperformanceasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT mengyuanhan effectsofvelocitybasedtrainingvstraditional1rmpercentagebasedtrainingonimprovingstrengthjumplinearsprintandchangeofdirectionspeedperformanceasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT linlongli effectsofvelocitybasedtrainingvstraditional1rmpercentagebasedtrainingonimprovingstrengthjumplinearsprintandchangeofdirectionspeedperformanceasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT georgepnassis effectsofvelocitybasedtrainingvstraditional1rmpercentagebasedtrainingonimprovingstrengthjumplinearsprintandchangeofdirectionspeedperformanceasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT yongmingli effectsofvelocitybasedtrainingvstraditional1rmpercentagebasedtrainingonimprovingstrengthjumplinearsprintandchangeofdirectionspeedperformanceasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
_version_	1718374807621337088

Effects of velocity based training vs. traditional 1RM percentage-based training on improving strength, jump, linear sprint and change of direction speed performance: A Systematic review with meta-analysis.

Ejemplares similares