Prediction of response of methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using serum lipidomics
Abstract Methotrexate (MTX) is a common first-line treatment for new-onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, MTX is ineffective for 30–40% of patients and there is no way to know which patients might benefit. Here, we built statistical models based on serum lipid levels measured at two time-points...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/15aaa01033fa4c62b85b8be3ce377903 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:15aaa01033fa4c62b85b8be3ce377903 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:15aaa01033fa4c62b85b8be3ce3779032021-12-02T13:26:58ZPrediction of response of methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using serum lipidomics10.1038/s41598-021-86729-72045-2322https://doaj.org/article/15aaa01033fa4c62b85b8be3ce3779032021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86729-7https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Methotrexate (MTX) is a common first-line treatment for new-onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, MTX is ineffective for 30–40% of patients and there is no way to know which patients might benefit. Here, we built statistical models based on serum lipid levels measured at two time-points (pre-treatment and following 4 weeks on-drug) to investigate if MTX response (by 6 months) could be predicted. Patients about to commence MTX treatment for the first time were selected from the Rheumatoid Arthritis Medication Study (RAMS). Patients were categorised as good or non-responders following 6 months on-drug using EULAR response criteria. Serum lipids were measured using ultra‐performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry and supervised machine learning methods (including regularized regression, support vector machine and random forest) were used to predict EULAR response. Models including lipid levels were compared to models including clinical covariates alone. The best performing classifier including lipid levels (assessed at 4 weeks) was constructed using regularized regression (ROC AUC 0.61 ± 0.02). However, the clinical covariate based model outperformed the classifier including lipid levels when either pre- or on-treatment time-points were investigated (ROC AUC 0.68 ± 0.02). Pre- or early-treatment serum lipid profiles are unlikely to inform classification of MTX response by 6 months with performance adequate for use in RA clinical management.Mateusz MaciejewskiCaroline SandsNisha NairStephanie LingSuzanne VerstappenKimme HyrichAnne BartonDaniel ZiemekMatthew R. LewisDarren PlantNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-6 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Mateusz Maciejewski Caroline Sands Nisha Nair Stephanie Ling Suzanne Verstappen Kimme Hyrich Anne Barton Daniel Ziemek Matthew R. Lewis Darren Plant Prediction of response of methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using serum lipidomics |
description |
Abstract Methotrexate (MTX) is a common first-line treatment for new-onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, MTX is ineffective for 30–40% of patients and there is no way to know which patients might benefit. Here, we built statistical models based on serum lipid levels measured at two time-points (pre-treatment and following 4 weeks on-drug) to investigate if MTX response (by 6 months) could be predicted. Patients about to commence MTX treatment for the first time were selected from the Rheumatoid Arthritis Medication Study (RAMS). Patients were categorised as good or non-responders following 6 months on-drug using EULAR response criteria. Serum lipids were measured using ultra‐performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry and supervised machine learning methods (including regularized regression, support vector machine and random forest) were used to predict EULAR response. Models including lipid levels were compared to models including clinical covariates alone. The best performing classifier including lipid levels (assessed at 4 weeks) was constructed using regularized regression (ROC AUC 0.61 ± 0.02). However, the clinical covariate based model outperformed the classifier including lipid levels when either pre- or on-treatment time-points were investigated (ROC AUC 0.68 ± 0.02). Pre- or early-treatment serum lipid profiles are unlikely to inform classification of MTX response by 6 months with performance adequate for use in RA clinical management. |
format |
article |
author |
Mateusz Maciejewski Caroline Sands Nisha Nair Stephanie Ling Suzanne Verstappen Kimme Hyrich Anne Barton Daniel Ziemek Matthew R. Lewis Darren Plant |
author_facet |
Mateusz Maciejewski Caroline Sands Nisha Nair Stephanie Ling Suzanne Verstappen Kimme Hyrich Anne Barton Daniel Ziemek Matthew R. Lewis Darren Plant |
author_sort |
Mateusz Maciejewski |
title |
Prediction of response of methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using serum lipidomics |
title_short |
Prediction of response of methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using serum lipidomics |
title_full |
Prediction of response of methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using serum lipidomics |
title_fullStr |
Prediction of response of methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using serum lipidomics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prediction of response of methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using serum lipidomics |
title_sort |
prediction of response of methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using serum lipidomics |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/15aaa01033fa4c62b85b8be3ce377903 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mateuszmaciejewski predictionofresponseofmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisusingserumlipidomics AT carolinesands predictionofresponseofmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisusingserumlipidomics AT nishanair predictionofresponseofmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisusingserumlipidomics AT stephanieling predictionofresponseofmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisusingserumlipidomics AT suzanneverstappen predictionofresponseofmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisusingserumlipidomics AT kimmehyrich predictionofresponseofmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisusingserumlipidomics AT annebarton predictionofresponseofmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisusingserumlipidomics AT danielziemek predictionofresponseofmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisusingserumlipidomics AT matthewrlewis predictionofresponseofmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisusingserumlipidomics AT darrenplant predictionofresponseofmethotrexateinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisusingserumlipidomics |
_version_ |
1718393016086953984 |