Validity and test–retest reliability of the Persian version of the Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale

Validity and test–retest reliability of the Persian version of the Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale

Mohammad Ahmadpanah,1 Meisam Sheikhbabaei,1 Mohammad Haghighi,1 Fatemeh Roham,1 Leila Jahangard,1 Amineh Akhondi,2 Dena Sadeghi Bahmani,3 Hafez Bajoghli,4 Edith Holsboer-Trachsler,3 Serge Brand3,5 1Behavioral Disorders and Substances Abuse Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Ha...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmadpanah M, Sheikhbabaei M, Haghighi M, Roham F, Jahangard L, Akhondi A, Sadeghi Bahmani D, Bajoghli H, Holsboer-Trachsler E, Br, S
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
major depressive disorders
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale
validation
reliability
Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
RC346-429
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/15d5c28e910b4bbd8cdd6de3ffadb5d3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:15d5c28e910b4bbd8cdd6de3ffadb5d3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:15d5c28e910b4bbd8cdd6de3ffadb5d32021-12-02T00:56:02ZValidity and test–retest reliability of the Persian version of the Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale1178-2021https://doaj.org/article/15d5c28e910b4bbd8cdd6de3ffadb5d32016-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/validity-and-testndashretest-reliability-of-the-persian-version-of-the-peer-reviewed-article-NDThttps://doaj.org/toc/1178-2021Mohammad Ahmadpanah,1 Meisam Sheikhbabaei,1 Mohammad Haghighi,1 Fatemeh Roham,1 Leila Jahangard,1 Amineh Akhondi,2 Dena Sadeghi Bahmani,3 Hafez Bajoghli,4 Edith Holsboer-Trachsler,3 Serge Brand3,5 1Behavioral Disorders and Substances Abuse Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran; 2Hamadan Educational Organization, Ministry of Education, Hamadan, Iran; 3Center for Affective, Stress, and Sleep Disorders, Psychiatric Clinics of the University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; 4Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies (INCAS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; 5Department of Sport, Exercise and Health Science, Sport Science Section, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland Background and aims: The Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is an expert’s rating tool to assess the severity and symptoms of depression. The aim of the present two studies was to validate the Persian version of the MADRS and determine its test–retest reliability in patients diagnosed with major depressive disorders (MDD). Methods: In study 1, the translated MADRS and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) were applied to 210 patients diagnosed with MDD and 100 healthy adults. In study 2,200 patients diagnosed with MDD were assessed with the MADRS in face-to-face interviews. Thereafter, 100 patients were assessed 3–14 days later, again via face-to-face-interviews, while the other 100 patients were assessed 3–14 days later via a telephone interview. Results: Study 1: The MADRS and HDRS scores between patients with MDD and healthy controls differed significantly. Agreement between scoring of the MADRS and HDRS was high (r=0.95). Study 2: The intraclass correlation coefficient (test–retest reliability) was r=0.944 for the face-to-face interviews, and r=0.959 for the telephone interviews. Conclusion: The present data suggest that the Persian MADRS has high validity and excellent test–retest reliability over a time interval of 3–14 days, irrespective of whether the second assessment was carried out face-to-face or via a telephone interview. Keywords: major depressive disorders, Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale, validation, reliability Ahmadpanah MSheikhbabaei MHaghighi MRoham FJahangard LAkhondi ASadeghi Bahmani DBajoghli HHolsboer-Trachsler EBrSDove Medical Pressarticlemajor depressive disordersMontgomery-Asberg Depression Rating ScalevalidationreliabilityNeurosciences. Biological psychiatry. NeuropsychiatryRC321-571Neurology. Diseases of the nervous systemRC346-429ENNeuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, Vol 2016, Iss Issue 1, Pp 603-607 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic major depressive disorders
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale
validation
reliability
Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
RC346-429
spellingShingle major depressive disorders
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale
validation
reliability
Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
RC346-429
Ahmadpanah M
Sheikhbabaei M
Haghighi M
Roham F
Jahangard L
Akhondi A
Sadeghi Bahmani D
Bajoghli H
Holsboer-Trachsler E
Br
S
Validity and test–retest reliability of the Persian version of the Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale
description Mohammad Ahmadpanah,1 Meisam Sheikhbabaei,1 Mohammad Haghighi,1 Fatemeh Roham,1 Leila Jahangard,1 Amineh Akhondi,2 Dena Sadeghi Bahmani,3 Hafez Bajoghli,4 Edith Holsboer-Trachsler,3 Serge Brand3,5 1Behavioral Disorders and Substances Abuse Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran; 2Hamadan Educational Organization, Ministry of Education, Hamadan, Iran; 3Center for Affective, Stress, and Sleep Disorders, Psychiatric Clinics of the University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; 4Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies (INCAS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; 5Department of Sport, Exercise and Health Science, Sport Science Section, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland Background and aims: The Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is an expert’s rating tool to assess the severity and symptoms of depression. The aim of the present two studies was to validate the Persian version of the MADRS and determine its test–retest reliability in patients diagnosed with major depressive disorders (MDD). Methods: In study 1, the translated MADRS and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) were applied to 210 patients diagnosed with MDD and 100 healthy adults. In study 2,200 patients diagnosed with MDD were assessed with the MADRS in face-to-face interviews. Thereafter, 100 patients were assessed 3–14 days later, again via face-to-face-interviews, while the other 100 patients were assessed 3–14 days later via a telephone interview. Results: Study 1: The MADRS and HDRS scores between patients with MDD and healthy controls differed significantly. Agreement between scoring of the MADRS and HDRS was high (r=0.95). Study 2: The intraclass correlation coefficient (test–retest reliability) was r=0.944 for the face-to-face interviews, and r=0.959 for the telephone interviews. Conclusion: The present data suggest that the Persian MADRS has high validity and excellent test–retest reliability over a time interval of 3–14 days, irrespective of whether the second assessment was carried out face-to-face or via a telephone interview. Keywords: major depressive disorders, Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale, validation, reliability 
format article
author Ahmadpanah M
Sheikhbabaei M
Haghighi M
Roham F
Jahangard L
Akhondi A
Sadeghi Bahmani D
Bajoghli H
Holsboer-Trachsler E
Br
S
author_facet Ahmadpanah M
Sheikhbabaei M
Haghighi M
Roham F
Jahangard L
Akhondi A
Sadeghi Bahmani D
Bajoghli H
Holsboer-Trachsler E
Br
S
author_sort Ahmadpanah M
title Validity and test–retest reliability of the Persian version of the Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale
title_short Validity and test–retest reliability of the Persian version of the Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale
title_full Validity and test–retest reliability of the Persian version of the Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale
title_fullStr Validity and test–retest reliability of the Persian version of the Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale
title_full_unstemmed Validity and test–retest reliability of the Persian version of the Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale
title_sort validity and test–retest reliability of the persian version of the montgomery–asberg depression rating scale
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/15d5c28e910b4bbd8cdd6de3ffadb5d3
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadpanahm validityandtestndashretestreliabilityofthepersianversionofthemontgomeryndashasbergdepressionratingscale
AT sheikhbabaeim validityandtestndashretestreliabilityofthepersianversionofthemontgomeryndashasbergdepressionratingscale
AT haghighim validityandtestndashretestreliabilityofthepersianversionofthemontgomeryndashasbergdepressionratingscale
AT rohamf validityandtestndashretestreliabilityofthepersianversionofthemontgomeryndashasbergdepressionratingscale
AT jahangardl validityandtestndashretestreliabilityofthepersianversionofthemontgomeryndashasbergdepressionratingscale
AT akhondia validityandtestndashretestreliabilityofthepersianversionofthemontgomeryndashasbergdepressionratingscale
AT sadeghibahmanid validityandtestndashretestreliabilityofthepersianversionofthemontgomeryndashasbergdepressionratingscale
AT bajoghlih validityandtestndashretestreliabilityofthepersianversionofthemontgomeryndashasbergdepressionratingscale
AT holsboertrachslere validityandtestndashretestreliabilityofthepersianversionofthemontgomeryndashasbergdepressionratingscale
AT br validityandtestndashretestreliabilityofthepersianversionofthemontgomeryndashasbergdepressionratingscale
AT s validityandtestndashretestreliabilityofthepersianversionofthemontgomeryndashasbergdepressionratingscale
_version_ 1718403364409049088

Ejemplares similares